The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Tânia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Marques, João Amaral, Garcia-Marques, Leonel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6198
Resumo: Implicit memory reflects itself on situations in which previously acquired information is expressed, without awareness or intention. The study of implicit memory has had a profound impact on how researchers have investigated the human memory. In this paper, we review the main studies which have revealed dissociations between direct and indirect tests of memory, and address the two main theoretical approaches used to explain these dissociations: the processing view and the multiple systems view. We then describe recent neuroscience studies and discuss its contributions to help clarify the debate about the mechanisms involved in explicit and implicit memory. Finally, we critically analyze some questions and controversies surrounding this literature, such as (a) the transparency assumption and the contamination issue; and (b) the theoretical utility of the dissociations. We emphasize that the biggest challenge for future research is to develop comprehensive theories that integrate behavioral and neuroscience findings.
id RCAP_d12c288eae7cc64222fc77c432bec651
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/6198
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memoryInexistenteImplicit memory reflects itself on situations in which previously acquired information is expressed, without awareness or intention. The study of implicit memory has had a profound impact on how researchers have investigated the human memory. In this paper, we review the main studies which have revealed dissociations between direct and indirect tests of memory, and address the two main theoretical approaches used to explain these dissociations: the processing view and the multiple systems view. We then describe recent neuroscience studies and discuss its contributions to help clarify the debate about the mechanisms involved in explicit and implicit memory. Finally, we critically analyze some questions and controversies surrounding this literature, such as (a) the transparency assumption and the contamination issue; and (b) the theoretical utility of the dissociations. We emphasize that the biggest challenge for future research is to develop comprehensive theories that integrate behavioral and neuroscience findings.Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)Universidad de Valencia. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del ComportamientoRepositório do ISPARamos, TâniaMarques, João AmaralGarcia-Marques, Leonel2018-02-15T13:47:16Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6198engPsicológica, 38, 365-393.0211-2159info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:41:56Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/6198Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:24:02.046079Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
title The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
spellingShingle The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
Ramos, Tânia
Inexistente
title_short The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
title_full The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
title_fullStr The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
title_full_unstemmed The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
title_sort The memory of what we do not recall: Dissociations and theoretical debates in the study of implicit memory
author Ramos, Tânia
author_facet Ramos, Tânia
Marques, João Amaral
Garcia-Marques, Leonel
author_role author
author2 Marques, João Amaral
Garcia-Marques, Leonel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Tânia
Marques, João Amaral
Garcia-Marques, Leonel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inexistente
topic Inexistente
description Implicit memory reflects itself on situations in which previously acquired information is expressed, without awareness or intention. The study of implicit memory has had a profound impact on how researchers have investigated the human memory. In this paper, we review the main studies which have revealed dissociations between direct and indirect tests of memory, and address the two main theoretical approaches used to explain these dissociations: the processing view and the multiple systems view. We then describe recent neuroscience studies and discuss its contributions to help clarify the debate about the mechanisms involved in explicit and implicit memory. Finally, we critically analyze some questions and controversies surrounding this literature, such as (a) the transparency assumption and the contamination issue; and (b) the theoretical utility of the dissociations. We emphasize that the biggest challenge for future research is to develop comprehensive theories that integrate behavioral and neuroscience findings.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-02-15T13:47:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6198
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Psicológica, 38, 365-393.
0211-2159
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Valencia. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Valencia. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130101045002240

Registros relacionados