Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840 https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0014 |
Resumo: | Multiple runs of a river basin model produced information about water allocation under different users’ priorities, creating a set of allocation scenarios as possible decision alternatives. To identify the most desired scenario that will, expectedly, be more readily accepted and implemented, involvement of stakeholders and reaching the consensus among them in evaluating scenarios are essential. This article describes methodology for integrating multi-criteria optimization as an efficient tool for the evaluation of scenarios in a group context, with river basin simulation-optimization models. Methodology was developed within the scope of the bilateral project Serbia–Portugal, and it consisted of five phases: defining the preference schemes of allocation, running the ACQUANET model, evaluating the criteria and strategies with analytic hierarchy process, aggregation and initial search for consensus in subgroups, and obtaining the final consensus converged result (best management strategy). The approach was tested on the water allocation problem in the Nadela watershed in Vojvodina Province in Serbia, with participation of 23 stakeholders. Promising results recommended the approach for the testing in different conditions in the area near Bragança in northeast Portugal (Sabor watershed). |
id |
RCAP_d1839dcba12d7f06cb3e7a9bec28d986 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106840 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scaleKonflikte und Lösungen beim Management der Wasserzuteilung auf der Ebene des Wassereinzugsgebietesriver basin modelallocation scenariosstakeholdersmulti-criteria optimizationconsensusFlußgebietsmodellZuteilungsszenarienInteressengruppenMulti-Kriterien-OptimierungKonsensMultiple runs of a river basin model produced information about water allocation under different users’ priorities, creating a set of allocation scenarios as possible decision alternatives. To identify the most desired scenario that will, expectedly, be more readily accepted and implemented, involvement of stakeholders and reaching the consensus among them in evaluating scenarios are essential. This article describes methodology for integrating multi-criteria optimization as an efficient tool for the evaluation of scenarios in a group context, with river basin simulation-optimization models. Methodology was developed within the scope of the bilateral project Serbia–Portugal, and it consisted of five phases: defining the preference schemes of allocation, running the ACQUANET model, evaluating the criteria and strategies with analytic hierarchy process, aggregation and initial search for consensus in subgroups, and obtaining the final consensus converged result (best management strategy). The approach was tested on the water allocation problem in the Nadela watershed in Vojvodina Province in Serbia, with participation of 23 stakeholders. Promising results recommended the approach for the testing in different conditions in the area near Bragança in northeast Portugal (Sabor watershed).Mehrere Durchläufe eines Flußbeckenmodels generierten Informationen über die Wasserzuteilung bei verschiedenen Nutzerprioritäten, dabei wurde ein Satz an Zuteilungsszenarien für mögliche Entscheidungsalternativen erstellt. Um das am meisten erwünschte Szenario zu identifizieren, das erwartungsgemäß leichter akzeptiert und umgesetzt wird, ist die Einbeziehung von Stakeholdern und das Erreichen eines Konsenses zwischen ihnen bei der Bewertung von Szenarien essenziell. Der Artikel beschreibt die Methodik zur Integration der Mehrkriterienoptimierung als effizientes Werkzeug zur Bewertung von Szenarien im Gruppenkontext mit Simulationsoptimierungsmodellen für Flußbecken. Die Methodik wurde im Rahmen des bilateralen Projekts zwischen Serbien und Portugal entwickelt und bestand aus fünf Phasen: Festlegung der bevorzugten Zuteilungsschemata, Laufenlassen des ACQUANET-Modells, Bewertung von Kriterien und Strategien mit analytischem Hierarchieprozess, Aggregation und anfängliche Suche nach Konsens in Untergruppen und Erzielung des endgültigen konsenskonvergenten Ergebnisses (beste Managementstrategie). Der Ansatz wurde in Bezug auf das Wasserverteilungsproblem im Wassereinzugsgebiet Nadela in der Provinz Vojvodina in Serbien getestet, unter Beteiligung von 23 Stakeholdern. Vielversprechende Ergebnisse empfehlen den Ansatz für die Erprobung unter verschiedenen Bedingungen in der Nähe von Bragança im Nordosten Portugals (Wassereinzugsgebiet Sabor).Sciendo2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0014eng0006-5471Srdjevic, ZoricaSrdjevic, BojanMelo, PauloJorge, Luísainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-04-26T10:56:32Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106840Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:23:14.316816Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale Konflikte und Lösungen beim Management der Wasserzuteilung auf der Ebene des Wassereinzugsgebietes |
title |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
spellingShingle |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale Srdjevic, Zorica river basin model allocation scenarios stakeholders multi-criteria optimization consensus Flußgebietsmodell Zuteilungsszenarien Interessengruppen Multi-Kriterien-Optimierung Konsens |
title_short |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
title_full |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
title_fullStr |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
title_sort |
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale |
author |
Srdjevic, Zorica |
author_facet |
Srdjevic, Zorica Srdjevic, Bojan Melo, Paulo Jorge, Luísa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Srdjevic, Bojan Melo, Paulo Jorge, Luísa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Srdjevic, Zorica Srdjevic, Bojan Melo, Paulo Jorge, Luísa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
river basin model allocation scenarios stakeholders multi-criteria optimization consensus Flußgebietsmodell Zuteilungsszenarien Interessengruppen Multi-Kriterien-Optimierung Konsens |
topic |
river basin model allocation scenarios stakeholders multi-criteria optimization consensus Flußgebietsmodell Zuteilungsszenarien Interessengruppen Multi-Kriterien-Optimierung Konsens |
description |
Multiple runs of a river basin model produced information about water allocation under different users’ priorities, creating a set of allocation scenarios as possible decision alternatives. To identify the most desired scenario that will, expectedly, be more readily accepted and implemented, involvement of stakeholders and reaching the consensus among them in evaluating scenarios are essential. This article describes methodology for integrating multi-criteria optimization as an efficient tool for the evaluation of scenarios in a group context, with river basin simulation-optimization models. Methodology was developed within the scope of the bilateral project Serbia–Portugal, and it consisted of five phases: defining the preference schemes of allocation, running the ACQUANET model, evaluating the criteria and strategies with analytic hierarchy process, aggregation and initial search for consensus in subgroups, and obtaining the final consensus converged result (best management strategy). The approach was tested on the water allocation problem in the Nadela watershed in Vojvodina Province in Serbia, with participation of 23 stakeholders. Promising results recommended the approach for the testing in different conditions in the area near Bragança in northeast Portugal (Sabor watershed). |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840 https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106840 https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0006-5471 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sciendo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sciendo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134120143486976 |