Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28665 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms. |
id |
RCAP_d19e6e162e7967760399113f7c2433a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/28665 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agentSequencingCritical movesValues of argumentationMunāẓaraArgumentative virtues and vicesThe aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms.University of Windsor2023-05-23T15:42:20Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z20232023-05-23T16:42:42Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/28665eng2293-734X10.22329/il.v43i1.7073Oruç, R.Uzelgun, M.Sadek, K.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:40:04Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/28665Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:18:30.803540Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
title |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
spellingShingle |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent Oruç, R. Sequencing Critical moves Values of argumentation Munāẓara Argumentative virtues and vices |
title_short |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
title_full |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
title_fullStr |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
title_sort |
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent |
author |
Oruç, R. |
author_facet |
Oruç, R. Uzelgun, M. Sadek, K. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Uzelgun, M. Sadek, K. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oruç, R. Uzelgun, M. Sadek, K. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sequencing Critical moves Values of argumentation Munāẓara Argumentative virtues and vices |
topic |
Sequencing Critical moves Values of argumentation Munāẓara Argumentative virtues and vices |
description |
The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-23T15:42:20Z 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023 2023-05-23T16:42:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28665 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28665 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2293-734X 10.22329/il.v43i1.7073 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Windsor |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Windsor |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134744011603968 |