Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Verbeek, Bart-Jaap
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333
Resumo: Much has been written about the ongoing legitimacy crisis of the global investment treaty regime and the system of investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS). In the European Union (EU), the proposed inclusion of investment protection provisions and ISDS in negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the United States triggered unprecedented levels of contestation. This article seeks to explain why EU responses to such contestation, in the form of an investment court system and a multilateral investment court, did not bring about a clear break away from the traditional ISDS model. Drawing on critical political economy perspectives, it regards the EU investment policy following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon as deeply embedded in a broader neoliberal project mediated by material, institutional, and ideological configurations. Several factors have inhibited possibilities for more fundamental changes. The European Commission construed the lack of legitimacy as stemming from ISDS’ procedural features rather than questioning its social purpose. There has been no shift in the underlying social power balance, and no comprehensive counter-project has been proposed. The European Commission enjoys relative autonomy vis-à-vis other parts within the EU institutional ensembles and wider societal interests, allowing it to block more radical solutions. Finally, there were no clear signs of a fundamental departure from the neoliberal path in terms of wider EU economic regulation.
id RCAP_d2077503d2f70efcd83485d78df6ec34
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5333
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment PolicyCETA; crisis; embedded neoliberalism; European Union; investment court system; investment protection; ISDS; legitimacy; multilateral investment court; TTIPMuch has been written about the ongoing legitimacy crisis of the global investment treaty regime and the system of investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS). In the European Union (EU), the proposed inclusion of investment protection provisions and ISDS in negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the United States triggered unprecedented levels of contestation. This article seeks to explain why EU responses to such contestation, in the form of an investment court system and a multilateral investment court, did not bring about a clear break away from the traditional ISDS model. Drawing on critical political economy perspectives, it regards the EU investment policy following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon as deeply embedded in a broader neoliberal project mediated by material, institutional, and ideological configurations. Several factors have inhibited possibilities for more fundamental changes. The European Commission construed the lack of legitimacy as stemming from ISDS’ procedural features rather than questioning its social purpose. There has been no shift in the underlying social power balance, and no comprehensive counter-project has been proposed. The European Commission enjoys relative autonomy vis-à-vis other parts within the EU institutional ensembles and wider societal interests, allowing it to block more radical solutions. Finally, there were no clear signs of a fundamental departure from the neoliberal path in terms of wider EU economic regulation.Cogitatio2022-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5333Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Legitimacy and Global Economic Ties; 110-1202183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5333https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5333/5333Copyright (c) 2022 Bart-Jaap Verbeekhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVerbeek, Bart-Jaap2022-10-21T16:03:51Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5333Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:47.473261Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
title Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
spellingShingle Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
Verbeek, Bart-Jaap
CETA; crisis; embedded neoliberalism; European Union; investment court system; investment protection; ISDS; legitimacy; multilateral investment court; TTIP
title_short Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
title_full Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
title_fullStr Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
title_full_unstemmed Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
title_sort Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy
author Verbeek, Bart-Jaap
author_facet Verbeek, Bart-Jaap
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Verbeek, Bart-Jaap
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CETA; crisis; embedded neoliberalism; European Union; investment court system; investment protection; ISDS; legitimacy; multilateral investment court; TTIP
topic CETA; crisis; embedded neoliberalism; European Union; investment court system; investment protection; ISDS; legitimacy; multilateral investment court; TTIP
description Much has been written about the ongoing legitimacy crisis of the global investment treaty regime and the system of investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS). In the European Union (EU), the proposed inclusion of investment protection provisions and ISDS in negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the United States triggered unprecedented levels of contestation. This article seeks to explain why EU responses to such contestation, in the form of an investment court system and a multilateral investment court, did not bring about a clear break away from the traditional ISDS model. Drawing on critical political economy perspectives, it regards the EU investment policy following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon as deeply embedded in a broader neoliberal project mediated by material, institutional, and ideological configurations. Several factors have inhibited possibilities for more fundamental changes. The European Commission construed the lack of legitimacy as stemming from ISDS’ procedural features rather than questioning its social purpose. There has been no shift in the underlying social power balance, and no comprehensive counter-project has been proposed. The European Commission enjoys relative autonomy vis-à-vis other parts within the EU institutional ensembles and wider societal interests, allowing it to block more radical solutions. Finally, there were no clear signs of a fundamental departure from the neoliberal path in terms of wider EU economic regulation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5333
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5333
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5333
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5333
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5333/5333
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Bart-Jaap Verbeek
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Bart-Jaap Verbeek
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Legitimacy and Global Economic Ties; 110-120
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130591257427968