Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024 |
Resumo: | The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards. |
id |
RCAP_d2694aa8f0dfd0a357100bbffd65c7ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.parc.ipp.pt:article/1024 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and AuditingCognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and AuditingTrue and fair viewComplex conceptsCognitive Load TheoryAcademicsStudentsSurveyTrue and fair viewComplex conceptsCognitive Load TheoryAcademicsStudentsSurveyThe objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto2017-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024Journal of Business and Legal Sciences / Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas; No. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; Núm. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; N.º 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-281646-102910.26537/rcej.v0i28reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024/480Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarvey, Anne M.Gonzalo-Angulo, José AntonioParte, Laura2024-02-07T10:04:22Zoai:oai.parc.ipp.pt:article/1024Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:57:03.098863Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
title |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
spellingShingle |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing Garvey, Anne M. True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey |
title_short |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
title_full |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
title_fullStr |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
title_sort |
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing |
author |
Garvey, Anne M. |
author_facet |
Garvey, Anne M. Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio Parte, Laura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio Parte, Laura |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garvey, Anne M. Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio Parte, Laura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey |
topic |
True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey True and fair view Complex concepts Cognitive Load Theory Academics Students Survey |
description |
The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024 https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024 https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024/480 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Business and Legal Sciences / Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas; No. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28 Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; Núm. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28 Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; N.º 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28 1646-1029 10.26537/rcej.v0i28 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130438753583104 |