Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garvey, Anne M.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio, Parte, Laura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024
Resumo: The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.
id RCAP_d2694aa8f0dfd0a357100bbffd65c7ca
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.parc.ipp.pt:article/1024
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and AuditingCognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and AuditingTrue and fair viewComplex conceptsCognitive Load TheoryAcademicsStudentsSurveyTrue and fair viewComplex conceptsCognitive Load TheoryAcademicsStudentsSurveyThe objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto2017-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024Journal of Business and Legal Sciences / Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas; No. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; Núm. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; N.º 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-281646-102910.26537/rcej.v0i28reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024/480Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarvey, Anne M.Gonzalo-Angulo, José AntonioParte, Laura2024-02-07T10:04:22Zoai:oai.parc.ipp.pt:article/1024Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:57:03.098863Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
title Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
spellingShingle Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
Garvey, Anne M.
True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
title_short Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
title_full Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
title_fullStr Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
title_sort Cognitive Load Theory: Limiting the GAP between Academics and Students in Accounting and Auditing
author Garvey, Anne M.
author_facet Garvey, Anne M.
Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio
Parte, Laura
author_role author
author2 Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio
Parte, Laura
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garvey, Anne M.
Gonzalo-Angulo, José Antonio
Parte, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
topic True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
True and fair view
Complex concepts
Cognitive Load Theory
Academics
Students
Survey
description The objective of this paper is to investigate if academics and students share similar cognitive structures in relation to the True and Fair View (TFV) concept, a complex accounting principle, which has no official definition and is open to interpretation and professional judgement. A survey method was used to obtain data for this study. The survey allows us to explore academics and students cognitive structures in order to discover differences and the reasons for the variances if any.Our results show that academics and students do not share similar cognitive structures in three areas of interest: i) compliance with accounting rules and the fulfilment of True and Fair View, ii) the need to provide a written definition of True and Fair View, and iii) the interpretation of True and Fair View. The evidence can be interpreted due to the fact that academics and students tend to use different cognitive schemes in problem solving at least in complex concepts such as TFV. The evidence is supported by the cognitive load theory (CLT).We believe that useful financial information can be improved by understanding these differences and by subsequently implementing criteria in order to reduce the gap between academics and students in the area of information comprehension and presentation with the use of schemes, improvement in educational material and other assistance in the application and interpretation of written standards.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024
https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024
url https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i28.1024
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024
https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/rebules/article/view/1024/480
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Review of Business and Legal Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CEOS.PP / School of Accounting and Administration of Porto, Polytechnic of Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Business and Legal Sciences / Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas; No. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28
Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; Núm. 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28
Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Journal of Business and Legal Sciences; N.º 28 (2017): Revista de Ciências Empresariais e Jurídicas / Review of Business and Legal Sciences; 5-28
1646-1029
10.26537/rcej.v0i28
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130438753583104