Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487 |
Resumo: | In the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies. |
id |
RCAP_d2b593d16703a662f06bfc9e97ccc7b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30487 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine warSecuritização -- SecuritizationMigrationRussia-Ukraine warThe GuardianMigraçãoGuerra entre Rússia-UcrâniaIn the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies.Nas últimas décadas, a migração tem vindo a ser cada vez mais considerada como uma potencial ameaça à segurança pela União Europeia e, como resultado, foram implementadas várias iniciativas com a intenção de reforçar as fronteiras europeias. No entanto, o conflito entre a Rússia e a Ucrânia pode ter aberto a porta à re-securitização dos requerentes de asilo, uma vez que o afluxo maciço de refugiados passou a ser entendido como uma questão de segurança humana, assistência internacional e direitos humanos fundamentais, em vez de uma ameaça à segurança interna e à estabilidade social. Neste contexto, esta dissertação investiga como é que a crise dos refugiados ucranianos resultante da invasão russa da Ucrânia foi enquadrada pelo The Guardian? Estas representações reificam a ideia dos refugiados como potenciais fontes de insegurança nacional e social, ou centram-se predominantemente nas condições de insegurança vividas pelos refugiados? Com base no enquadramento da teoria da securitização e operacionalizado através do método de análise de conteúdo, este estudo analisa cinquenta e dois artigos publicados pelo The Guardian durante o primeiro ano de conflito entre a Rússia e a Ucrânia. A tese apresenta duas conclusões principais. Em primeiro lugar, mostra que o enquadramento dos refugiados ucranianos ultrapassou a camada humana da insegurança e contribuiu para re-securitizar múltiplos referentes a proteger e ameaças a assegurar. Em segundo lugar, e contra a formulação original da teoria da securitização, argumenta que o enquadramento de alguns grupos como sendo sistematicamente inseguros pode efetivamente contribuir para garantir os seus direitos humanos e facilitar a sua integração nas sociedades de acolhimento.2024-01-22T10:21:40Z2023-12-14T00:00:00Z2023-12-142023-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487TID:203458737engMartins, Ana Isabel Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-28T01:20:15Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30487Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:18.541742Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
title |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
spellingShingle |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira Securitização -- Securitization Migration Russia-Ukraine war The Guardian Migração Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia |
title_short |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
title_full |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
title_fullStr |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
title_full_unstemmed |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
title_sort |
Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war |
author |
Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira |
author_facet |
Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Securitização -- Securitization Migration Russia-Ukraine war The Guardian Migração Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia |
topic |
Securitização -- Securitization Migration Russia-Ukraine war The Guardian Migração Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia |
description |
In the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-14T00:00:00Z 2023-12-14 2023-10 2024-01-22T10:21:40Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487 TID:203458737 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:203458737 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137067853152256 |