Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487
Resumo: In the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies.
id RCAP_d2b593d16703a662f06bfc9e97ccc7b2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30487
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine warSecuritização -- SecuritizationMigrationRussia-Ukraine warThe GuardianMigraçãoGuerra entre Rússia-UcrâniaIn the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies.Nas últimas décadas, a migração tem vindo a ser cada vez mais considerada como uma potencial ameaça à segurança pela União Europeia e, como resultado, foram implementadas várias iniciativas com a intenção de reforçar as fronteiras europeias. No entanto, o conflito entre a Rússia e a Ucrânia pode ter aberto a porta à re-securitização dos requerentes de asilo, uma vez que o afluxo maciço de refugiados passou a ser entendido como uma questão de segurança humana, assistência internacional e direitos humanos fundamentais, em vez de uma ameaça à segurança interna e à estabilidade social. Neste contexto, esta dissertação investiga como é que a crise dos refugiados ucranianos resultante da invasão russa da Ucrânia foi enquadrada pelo The Guardian? Estas representações reificam a ideia dos refugiados como potenciais fontes de insegurança nacional e social, ou centram-se predominantemente nas condições de insegurança vividas pelos refugiados? Com base no enquadramento da teoria da securitização e operacionalizado através do método de análise de conteúdo, este estudo analisa cinquenta e dois artigos publicados pelo The Guardian durante o primeiro ano de conflito entre a Rússia e a Ucrânia. A tese apresenta duas conclusões principais. Em primeiro lugar, mostra que o enquadramento dos refugiados ucranianos ultrapassou a camada humana da insegurança e contribuiu para re-securitizar múltiplos referentes a proteger e ameaças a assegurar. Em segundo lugar, e contra a formulação original da teoria da securitização, argumenta que o enquadramento de alguns grupos como sendo sistematicamente inseguros pode efetivamente contribuir para garantir os seus direitos humanos e facilitar a sua integração nas sociedades de acolhimento.2024-01-22T10:21:40Z2023-12-14T00:00:00Z2023-12-142023-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487TID:203458737engMartins, Ana Isabel Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-28T01:20:15Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/30487Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:18.541742Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
title Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
spellingShingle Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira
Securitização -- Securitization
Migration
Russia-Ukraine war
The Guardian
Migração
Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia
title_short Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
title_full Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
title_fullStr Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
title_full_unstemmed Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
title_sort Securitizing, re-securitizing, or de-securitizing migration? The representation of Ukrainian asylum seekers in The Guardian during the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war
author Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira
author_facet Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Ana Isabel Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Securitização -- Securitization
Migration
Russia-Ukraine war
The Guardian
Migração
Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia
topic Securitização -- Securitization
Migration
Russia-Ukraine war
The Guardian
Migração
Guerra entre Rússia-Ucrânia
description In the last decades migration has become increasingly considered as a potential security threat by the European Union and, as a result, several initiatives were implemented with the intention to strengthen European borders. However, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine may have opened the door to the re-securitization of asylum seekers as the massive influx of refugees became understood as a matter of human security, international assistance, and fundamental human rights rather than a threat to domestic security and social stability. Against this backdrop, this dissertation investigates how has the Ukrainian refugee crisis resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine been framed by The Guardian? Do these representations reify the idea of refugees as potential sources of national and societal insecurity, or do they focus predominantly on the conditions of insecurity experienced by refugees? Grounded upon the framework of securitization theory, and operationalized through the method of content analysis, this study analysis fifty-two articles published by The Guardian during the first year of conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The thesis puts forward two main conclusions. First, it shows that the framing of Ukrainian refugees went beyond the human layer of insecurity and helped to re-securitized multiple referents to be protected and threats to be secured. Second, and against the original formulation of securitization theory, it argues that the framing of some groups as being systematically insecure can actually contribute to ensure their human rights and facilitate their integration into host societies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-14T00:00:00Z
2023-12-14
2023-10
2024-01-22T10:21:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487
TID:203458737
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/30487
identifier_str_mv TID:203458737
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137067853152256