Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tomas-Carus, Pablo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rosado, Hugo, Pereira, Catarina, Marmeleira, José, Veiga, Guida, Collado-Mateo, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927
https://doi.org/Tomas-Carus, P., Rosado, H., Pereira, C., Marmeleira, J., Veiga, G., Collado-Mateo, D. (2020) Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 91, 104216. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
Resumo: Introduction For dual-task paradigms, the timed up and go (TUG) test along with other cognitive or motor tasks has been used to evaluate and predict the risk of falling in older adults. However, the interference between motor-cognitive tasks can differ by the cognitive task. Objective To evaluate the performance of the TUG test under a single task condition and two dual-task conditions in older adults and to explore the effect of educational level on task performance. Methods A total of 418 older adults (328 females) voluntarily participated in this study. The TUG test was administered as a single task and a dual task with one secondary simultaneous task: counting aloud backward from 100 or naming animals. Comparisons were performed to determine the interference caused by each cognitive task on the motor task, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the role of educational level. Results The animal task led to a poorer TUG performance and a higher dual-task cost than did the counting task. Furthermore, the motor task led to a higher percentage of errors and cognitive stops in the animal task. Educational level plays a significant role in the interaction between tasks. Conclusions Between-task interference differs by the type of cognitive task performed and the educational level of the participants. The results of the present study should be considered when dual-task assessments are planned for older adults.
id RCAP_d2e7c17e09695716cd804f76d42fdb3b
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/29927
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.Introduction For dual-task paradigms, the timed up and go (TUG) test along with other cognitive or motor tasks has been used to evaluate and predict the risk of falling in older adults. However, the interference between motor-cognitive tasks can differ by the cognitive task. Objective To evaluate the performance of the TUG test under a single task condition and two dual-task conditions in older adults and to explore the effect of educational level on task performance. Methods A total of 418 older adults (328 females) voluntarily participated in this study. The TUG test was administered as a single task and a dual task with one secondary simultaneous task: counting aloud backward from 100 or naming animals. Comparisons were performed to determine the interference caused by each cognitive task on the motor task, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the role of educational level. Results The animal task led to a poorer TUG performance and a higher dual-task cost than did the counting task. Furthermore, the motor task led to a higher percentage of errors and cognitive stops in the animal task. Educational level plays a significant role in the interaction between tasks. Conclusions Between-task interference differs by the type of cognitive task performed and the educational level of the participants. The results of the present study should be considered when dual-task assessments are planned for older adults.Ageing Safely inAlentejo. Preventing Falls and Violence against the Elderly. Understanding for Action - (ESACA)”and was supported by the European Fund for regional development (FEDER) allocated byEuropean Union through the Horizon 2020 ProgramALT20-03-0145-FEDER-000007Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics2021-06-08T15:17:31Z2021-06-082020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927https://doi.org/Tomas-Carus, P., Rosado, H., Pereira, C., Marmeleira, J., Veiga, G., Collado-Mateo, D. (2020) Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 91, 104216. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216http://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216porptc@uevora.pthrosado@uevora.ptclnp@uevora.ptjmarmel@uevora.ptgveiga@uevora.ptnd239Tomas-Carus, PabloRosado, HugoPereira, CatarinaMarmeleira, JoséVeiga, GuidaCollado-Mateo, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:26:40Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/29927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:19:10.076429Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
title Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
spellingShingle Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
Tomas-Carus, Pablo
title_short Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
title_full Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
title_fullStr Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
title_full_unstemmed Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
title_sort Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults.
author Tomas-Carus, Pablo
author_facet Tomas-Carus, Pablo
Rosado, Hugo
Pereira, Catarina
Marmeleira, José
Veiga, Guida
Collado-Mateo, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Rosado, Hugo
Pereira, Catarina
Marmeleira, José
Veiga, Guida
Collado-Mateo, Daniel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tomas-Carus, Pablo
Rosado, Hugo
Pereira, Catarina
Marmeleira, José
Veiga, Guida
Collado-Mateo, Daniel
description Introduction For dual-task paradigms, the timed up and go (TUG) test along with other cognitive or motor tasks has been used to evaluate and predict the risk of falling in older adults. However, the interference between motor-cognitive tasks can differ by the cognitive task. Objective To evaluate the performance of the TUG test under a single task condition and two dual-task conditions in older adults and to explore the effect of educational level on task performance. Methods A total of 418 older adults (328 females) voluntarily participated in this study. The TUG test was administered as a single task and a dual task with one secondary simultaneous task: counting aloud backward from 100 or naming animals. Comparisons were performed to determine the interference caused by each cognitive task on the motor task, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the role of educational level. Results The animal task led to a poorer TUG performance and a higher dual-task cost than did the counting task. Furthermore, the motor task led to a higher percentage of errors and cognitive stops in the animal task. Educational level plays a significant role in the interaction between tasks. Conclusions Between-task interference differs by the type of cognitive task performed and the educational level of the participants. The results of the present study should be considered when dual-task assessments are planned for older adults.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021-06-08T15:17:31Z
2021-06-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927
https://doi.org/Tomas-Carus, P., Rosado, H., Pereira, C., Marmeleira, J., Veiga, G., Collado-Mateo, D. (2020) Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 91, 104216. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/29927
https://doi.org/Tomas-Carus, P., Rosado, H., Pereira, C., Marmeleira, J., Veiga, G., Collado-Mateo, D. (2020) Differences between two types of dual tasks according to the educational level in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 91, 104216. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104216
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv ptc@uevora.pt
hrosado@uevora.pt
clnp@uevora.pt
jmarmel@uevora.pt
gveiga@uevora.pt
nd
239
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136673105182720