Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Susana
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pinto, Lígia M. Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936
Resumo: Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.
id RCAP_d32a2f69cc08efc9dbd29db8c3d0dfff
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/2936
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da AmorosaEnvironmental valuationChoice experimentsGMNLPreference heterogeneityCoastal erosion managementCoastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.2022-12-05T11:09:50Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212022-11-22T11:36:02Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936eng1387-585X10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0Oliveira, SusanaPinto, Lígia M. Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-21T14:40:54Zoai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/2936Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:44:14.195552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
title Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
spellingShingle Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
Oliveira, Susana
Environmental valuation
Choice experiments
GMNL
Preference heterogeneity
Coastal erosion management
title_short Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
title_full Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
title_fullStr Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
title_full_unstemmed Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
title_sort Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
author Oliveira, Susana
author_facet Oliveira, Susana
Pinto, Lígia M. Costa
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Lígia M. Costa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Susana
Pinto, Lígia M. Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental valuation
Choice experiments
GMNL
Preference heterogeneity
Coastal erosion management
topic Environmental valuation
Choice experiments
GMNL
Preference heterogeneity
Coastal erosion management
description Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2022-12-05T11:09:50Z
2022-11-22T11:36:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1387-585X
10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131528033206272