Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936 |
Resumo: | Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. |
id |
RCAP_d32a2f69cc08efc9dbd29db8c3d0dfff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/2936 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da AmorosaEnvironmental valuationChoice experimentsGMNLPreference heterogeneityCoastal erosion managementCoastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required.2022-12-05T11:09:50Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212022-11-22T11:36:02Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936eng1387-585X10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0Oliveira, SusanaPinto, Lígia M. Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-21T14:40:54Zoai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/2936Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:44:14.195552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
title |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
spellingShingle |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa Oliveira, Susana Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management |
title_short |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
title_full |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
title_fullStr |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
title_sort |
Choice experiments to elicit the users preferences for coastal erosion management : the case of Praia da Amorosa |
author |
Oliveira, Susana |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Susana Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Susana Pinto, Lígia M. Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management |
topic |
Environmental valuation Choice experiments GMNL Preference heterogeneity Coastal erosion management |
description |
Coastal erosion is a complex and increasingly important problem, largely due to its efects and management strategies. The current context of climate change, together with centuries of human occupation of shorelines, adds pressure for the development of sustainable coastal management policies, the success of which crucially depends on the consideration of all stakeholders’ perspectives. This research investigates users’ preferences over alternative options of coastal erosion management. Through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment, respondents’ preferences regarding management alternatives are elicited, and their willingness to pay for alternatives’ attributes is estimated. The results show that respondents prefer some interventions to mitigate the problem rather than no action, and prefer lighter intervention (palisades, gangways) to heavy infrastructures (rockflls, seawalls, groynes). Moreover, the results show the presence of preference heterogeneity and thus the need to use more fexible and complex models. Based on the results obtained, it is possible to drive some policy implications. First, the do-nothing option is not viable from the population’s standpoint; second, although some type of coastal erosion protection is demanded by the general population, the preferred approach is for light forms, contrary to the policy adopted in the last century, and still overwhelmingly present in the territory. Lastly, given the considerable heterogeneity in respondents’ preferences, careful consideration of the welfare impact of coastal interventions by population segments is required. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2022-12-05T11:09:50Z 2022-11-22T11:36:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2936 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1387-585X 10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131528033206272 |