Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22387 |
Resumo: | Although, review manipulation has shown to have a significant adverse impact on consumer welfare, there is yet little understanding of which economic incentives drive this behavior as most of the current research has focused on the characteristics that define a fake review. The present study investigates these incentives using the innovative approach of examining one-time contributor user reviews as an alternative measure of review manipulation. With a sample comprising 450 hotels, registered on TripAdvisor, from the cities of Amsterdam and Brussels two type of studies were developed encompassing both cross-sectional and panel data analyses. The empirical results obtained show that review manipulation is sufficiently economically important since agents with different economic incentives will indulge in review fraud in a dissimilar extent. These incentives were found to include: the type of organizational structure; the total number of reviews; and the attributed user bubble rating. |
id |
RCAP_d40207e53d1338793204aa53014e498c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/22387 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributorsFake reviewsReview manipulationReview fraudEWOMOnline consumer reviewsReview helpfulnessMachine learningDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoAlthough, review manipulation has shown to have a significant adverse impact on consumer welfare, there is yet little understanding of which economic incentives drive this behavior as most of the current research has focused on the characteristics that define a fake review. The present study investigates these incentives using the innovative approach of examining one-time contributor user reviews as an alternative measure of review manipulation. With a sample comprising 450 hotels, registered on TripAdvisor, from the cities of Amsterdam and Brussels two type of studies were developed encompassing both cross-sectional and panel data analyses. The empirical results obtained show that review manipulation is sufficiently economically important since agents with different economic incentives will indulge in review fraud in a dissimilar extent. These incentives were found to include: the type of organizational structure; the total number of reviews; and the attributed user bubble rating.Letterie, WilkoBernardo, DavidRUNDiaz, Daniel dos Santos2017-08-02T08:15:11Z2017-01-202017-01-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/22387TID:201714183enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T17:26:58Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/22387Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-22T17:26:58Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
title |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
spellingShingle |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors Diaz, Daniel dos Santos Fake reviews Review manipulation Review fraud EWOM Online consumer reviews Review helpfulness Machine learning Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
title_short |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
title_full |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
title_fullStr |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
title_sort |
Review manipolation in the hotel industry: the case of one- time contributors |
author |
Diaz, Daniel dos Santos |
author_facet |
Diaz, Daniel dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Letterie, Wilko Bernardo, David RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diaz, Daniel dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fake reviews Review manipulation Review fraud EWOM Online consumer reviews Review helpfulness Machine learning Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
topic |
Fake reviews Review manipulation Review fraud EWOM Online consumer reviews Review helpfulness Machine learning Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
description |
Although, review manipulation has shown to have a significant adverse impact on consumer welfare, there is yet little understanding of which economic incentives drive this behavior as most of the current research has focused on the characteristics that define a fake review. The present study investigates these incentives using the innovative approach of examining one-time contributor user reviews as an alternative measure of review manipulation. With a sample comprising 450 hotels, registered on TripAdvisor, from the cities of Amsterdam and Brussels two type of studies were developed encompassing both cross-sectional and panel data analyses. The empirical results obtained show that review manipulation is sufficiently economically important since agents with different economic incentives will indulge in review fraud in a dissimilar extent. These incentives were found to include: the type of organizational structure; the total number of reviews; and the attributed user bubble rating. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-02T08:15:11Z 2017-01-20 2017-01-20T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22387 TID:201714183 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/22387 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:201714183 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817545596689448960 |