Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20298 |
Resumo: | Review |
id |
RCAP_d4716d7f784abaab625bd42fa3bacf66 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/20298 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europeforest biodiversity indicatorsforest compositionforest structureforest ecosystem functionadaptive forest managementadaptive capacityresponse diversitypractical indicatorsReviewIncluding biodiversity assessments in forest management planning is becoming increasingly important due to the importance of biodiversity for forest ecosystem resilience provision and sustainable functioning. Here we investigated the potential to include biodiversity indicators into forest management planning in Europe. In particular, we aimed to (i) identify biodiversity indicators and data collection methods for biodiversity assessments at the stand and landscape levels, and (ii) evaluate the practicality of those indicators for forest management planning. We performed a literature review in which we screened 188 research studies published between 1990 and 2020. We selected 94 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and examined in more detail. We considered three aspects of biodiversity: structure, composition, and function, and four forest management categories: unmanaged, managed, plantation, and silvopastoral. We used three criteria to evaluate the practicality of forest biodiversity indicators: cost-e ectiveness, ease of application, and time-e ectiveness. We identified di erences in the practicality of biodiversity indicators for their incorporation into management plans. Stand-level indicators are more practical than landscape-level indicators. Moreover, structural biodiversity indicators (e.g., large trees, canopy openness, and old forest stands) are more useful in management plans than compositional indicators, as these are easily observable by non-professionals and can be obtained by forest inventories. Compositional indicators such are vascular plants, fungi, bryophyte, lichens, and invertebrate species are hard to identify by non-professionals and thus are impractical. Functional indicators (e.g., nutrient cycling) are not su ciently addressed in the literature. Using recently updated existing databases (e.g., national forest inventories and bird atlases) is very time and cost-e cient. Remote sensing and other technology (e.g., smartphone applications) are promising for e cient data collection in the future. However, more research is needed to make these tools more accurate and applicable to a variety of ecological conditions and scales. Until then, forest stand structural variables derived from inventories can help improve management plans to prepare European forests towards an uncertain futureMDPIRepositório da Universidade de LisboaCosovic, MarijaBugalho, Miguel N.Thom, DominikBorges, Jose G.2020-09-15T11:36:52Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20298engForests 2020, 11, 34310.3390/f11030343info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:49:44Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/20298Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:05:04.466519Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
title |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
spellingShingle |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe Cosovic, Marija forest biodiversity indicators forest composition forest structure forest ecosystem function adaptive forest management adaptive capacity response diversity practical indicators |
title_short |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
title_full |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
title_fullStr |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
title_sort |
Stand structural characteristics are the most practical biodiversity indicators for forest management planning in Europe |
author |
Cosovic, Marija |
author_facet |
Cosovic, Marija Bugalho, Miguel N. Thom, Dominik Borges, Jose G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bugalho, Miguel N. Thom, Dominik Borges, Jose G. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cosovic, Marija Bugalho, Miguel N. Thom, Dominik Borges, Jose G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
forest biodiversity indicators forest composition forest structure forest ecosystem function adaptive forest management adaptive capacity response diversity practical indicators |
topic |
forest biodiversity indicators forest composition forest structure forest ecosystem function adaptive forest management adaptive capacity response diversity practical indicators |
description |
Review |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-15T11:36:52Z 2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20298 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20298 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Forests 2020, 11, 343 10.3390/f11030343 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131143169114112 |