Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, R.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Malheiro, J., Tafulo, S., Santos, C., Almeida, M., Pedroso, S., Martins, L., Dias, L., Castro-Henriques, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
Resumo: Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.
id RCAP_d59f637f89e8fc8eb2a988844fcb011e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/1931
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survivalImpacto da sensibilização anti -MICA pré -transplante na rejeição e sobrevida do enxertoHLAkidneyMICArejectionsurvivaltransplantrejeiçãorimsobrevidatransplanteBackground: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.Introdução: O efeito deletério dos anticorpos para antigénios MICA (major histocompatibility class I chain-related A) na incidência de rejeição aguda e sobrevida do enxerto ainda não está consensualmente estabelecido. Metódos: Estudo retrospetivo de 554 transplantados renais. A análise comparativa entre doentes positivos e negativos para anticorpos anti-MICA pré-formados foi realizada para avaliar eventos sensibilizadores. A incidência de rejeição aguda no primeiro ano pós transplante renal e a sobrevida do enxerto renal foram determinadas consoante o resultado da citometria de fluxo pré-transplante para anticorpos anti-MICA e/ou anti- HLA (anti-human leukocyte antigen). Aplicou-se um modelo de análise multivariada para identificação de preditores independentes para rejeição aguda. Resultados: Foram identificados 41 doentes (7.4%) com anticorpos anti-MICA pré formados. A sensibilização para HLA, as transfusões sanguíneas e gestações prévias foram mais frequentes nos doentes MICA + mas apenas a presença de anticorpos anti-HLA classe I apresentou uma associação independente (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparativamente ao grupo MICA-/HLA–, o grupo MICA-/HLA+ apresentou menor sobrevida livre de rejeição ao 1º ano (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), maioritariamente ocorrida nos primeiros seis meses, enquanto que nenhuma diferença foi encontrada com o grupo MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). Apenas o status MICA-/HLA+ teve impacto independente na incidência de rejeição (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), ao contrário do status MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). O grupo MICA-/HLA+ apresentou menor sobrevida do enxerto censurada para a morte aos 4 anos (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03), não se verificando diferenças no grupo MICA+/HLA- (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusão: Os nossos resultados não suportam um efeito deletério dos anticorpos pré-formados para MICA, independente da sensibilização HLA, na incidência de rejeição aguda no 1º ano pós transplante e na sobrevida do enxerto.Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioCosta, R.Malheiro, J.Tafulo, S.Santos, C.Almeida, M.Pedroso, S.Martins, L.Dias, L.Castro-Henriques, A.2016-04-26T16:15:36Z20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931engPort J Nephrol Hypert 2015; 29(2): 130-1382183-1289info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-20T10:58:13Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/1931Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:38:14.664082Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
Impacto da sensibilização anti -MICA pré -transplante na rejeição e sobrevida do enxerto
title Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
spellingShingle Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
Costa, R.
HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
title_short Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_fullStr Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
title_sort Impact of pre-transplant anti-MICA sensitization in graft rejection and survival
author Costa, R.
author_facet Costa, R.
Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
author_role author
author2 Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, R.
Malheiro, J.
Tafulo, S.
Santos, C.
Almeida, M.
Pedroso, S.
Martins, L.
Dias, L.
Castro-Henriques, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
topic HLA
kidney
MICA
rejection
survival
transplant
rejeição
rim
sobrevida
transplante
description Background: Evidence supporting deleterious effect of preformed major histocompatibility class I chain-related A (MICA) antibodies in rejection incidence and graft survival is still unclear. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 554 kidney transplanted patients. Comparison between positive or negative for MICA antibodies patients was performed to characterize sensitizing triggers. Further classification according to pre-transplant flow cytometry-recorded anti–MICA and/or anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was made to determine first year rejection incidence and graft survival. Multivariate analysis was applied to determine predictors for acute rejection. Results: Pre-formed anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 41 patients (7.4%). HLA sensitization, blood transfusions and pregnancies were frequently found in anti-MICA+ patients but only pre-formed anti-HLA class I antibodies showed independent association (OR 2.67, p= 0.02). Comparing to MICA-/HLA–, MICA-/HLA+ group presented significantly lower first year rejection-free survival (78.6% vs. 89.3%, p< 0.01), mostly occurred in the first six months, while no difference was found in MICA+/HLA– (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p= ns). MICA-/HLA+ showed independent impact in rejection (OR 2.09, p= 0.03), while no evidence was found in MICA+/HLA- (OR 1.08, p= ns). At 4 years, MICA-/HLA+ group presented lower graft survival (85.8% vs. 95.3%, p= 0.03). Again, no difference was found in MICA+/HLA- group (95.1% vs. 95.3%, p= ns). Conclusion: Our results do not support HLA-independent deleterious pathogenic role of pre-formed MICA antibodies on first year rejection incidence and graft survival.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016-04-26T16:15:36Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/1931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Port J Nephrol Hypert 2015; 29(2): 130-138
2183-1289
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133644075302912