Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4131 |
Resumo: | The Eurocode 8 included three ductility classes: ductility class high (DC H), ductility class medium (DC M) and ductility class low (DC L). The aim of the present work is to give a full analysis of the implication during the design stage of the ductility class for the reinforced concrete frame structures regarding the Eurocode 8. To carry out the proposed study, a regular RC frame building has been designed in different hazard seismic zones for the three ductility classes according to the seismic design rules mentioned in Eurocode 8. In the end, nonlinear pushover analysis was used to assess the design of the frames. The results show that DC M has a high performance close to DC H, even in the high hazard seismic zones, and the cost of DC M frame is close to the costs of DC H frame, which could be less, if the workmanship is included, because DC H will cost more for the workmanship according to its complexity of the detailing. |
id |
RCAP_d62ccb93321d1406c0b431792fb20091 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/4131 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8Eurocode 8Reinforced concreteDuctilitySeismic designThe Eurocode 8 included three ductility classes: ductility class high (DC H), ductility class medium (DC M) and ductility class low (DC L). The aim of the present work is to give a full analysis of the implication during the design stage of the ductility class for the reinforced concrete frame structures regarding the Eurocode 8. To carry out the proposed study, a regular RC frame building has been designed in different hazard seismic zones for the three ductility classes according to the seismic design rules mentioned in Eurocode 8. In the end, nonlinear pushover analysis was used to assess the design of the frames. The results show that DC M has a high performance close to DC H, even in the high hazard seismic zones, and the cost of DC M frame is close to the costs of DC H frame, which could be less, if the workmanship is included, because DC H will cost more for the workmanship according to its complexity of the detailing.SpringerIC-OnlineRodrigues, HugoElawady, Mahmoud H.2019-09-27T13:29:54Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4131eng10.1007/s41062-018-0192-xmetadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T15:48:40Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/4131Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:48:04.811348Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
title |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
spellingShingle |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 Rodrigues, Hugo Eurocode 8 Reinforced concrete Ductility Seismic design |
title_short |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
title_full |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
title_fullStr |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
title_sort |
Ductility considerations in seismic design of reinforced concrete frame buildings according to the Eurocode 8 |
author |
Rodrigues, Hugo |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Hugo Elawady, Mahmoud H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Elawady, Mahmoud H. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
IC-Online |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Hugo Elawady, Mahmoud H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Eurocode 8 Reinforced concrete Ductility Seismic design |
topic |
Eurocode 8 Reinforced concrete Ductility Seismic design |
description |
The Eurocode 8 included three ductility classes: ductility class high (DC H), ductility class medium (DC M) and ductility class low (DC L). The aim of the present work is to give a full analysis of the implication during the design stage of the ductility class for the reinforced concrete frame structures regarding the Eurocode 8. To carry out the proposed study, a regular RC frame building has been designed in different hazard seismic zones for the three ductility classes according to the seismic design rules mentioned in Eurocode 8. In the end, nonlinear pushover analysis was used to assess the design of the frames. The results show that DC M has a high performance close to DC H, even in the high hazard seismic zones, and the cost of DC M frame is close to the costs of DC H frame, which could be less, if the workmanship is included, because DC H will cost more for the workmanship according to its complexity of the detailing. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-27T13:29:54Z 2019 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4131 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/4131 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1007/s41062-018-0192-x |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136974241529856 |