Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boas, Ingrid
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Schapendonk, Joris, Blondin, Suzy, Pas, Annemiek
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326
Resumo: As mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants?
id RCAP_d63dbcbeef92049db6cfe3a96a1b71c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologiesmobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representationAs mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants?Cogitatio2020-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Method as Border: Articulating ‘Inclusion/Exclusion’ as an Academic Concern in Migration and Border Research in Europe; 163-1462183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326/3326https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3326/1265Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoas, IngridSchapendonk, JorisBlondin, SuzyPas, Annemiek2022-12-20T11:00:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:49.043395Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
title Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
spellingShingle Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
Boas, Ingrid
mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation
title_short Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
title_full Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
title_fullStr Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
title_sort Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
author Boas, Ingrid
author_facet Boas, Ingrid
Schapendonk, Joris
Blondin, Suzy
Pas, Annemiek
author_role author
author2 Schapendonk, Joris
Blondin, Suzy
Pas, Annemiek
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boas, Ingrid
Schapendonk, Joris
Blondin, Suzy
Pas, Annemiek
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation
topic mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation
description As mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants?
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-19
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326/3326
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3326/1265
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Method as Border: Articulating ‘Inclusion/Exclusion’ as an Academic Concern in Migration and Border Research in Europe; 163-146
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817552693935210496