Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326 |
Resumo: | As mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants? |
id |
RCAP_d63dbcbeef92049db6cfe3a96a1b71c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologiesmobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representationAs mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants?Cogitatio2020-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Method as Border: Articulating ‘Inclusion/Exclusion’ as an Academic Concern in Migration and Border Research in Europe; 163-1462183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326/3326https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3326/1265Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoas, IngridSchapendonk, JorisBlondin, SuzyPas, Annemiek2022-12-20T11:00:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:49.043395Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
title |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
spellingShingle |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies Boas, Ingrid mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation |
title_short |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
title_full |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
title_fullStr |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
title_sort |
Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies |
author |
Boas, Ingrid |
author_facet |
Boas, Ingrid Schapendonk, Joris Blondin, Suzy Pas, Annemiek |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schapendonk, Joris Blondin, Suzy Pas, Annemiek |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Boas, Ingrid Schapendonk, Joris Blondin, Suzy Pas, Annemiek |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation |
topic |
mobile methodologies; mobility; positionality; reflexivity; representation |
description |
As mobilities studies became a well-respected field in social science, discussions on mobile research designs followed. Usually, these discussions are part of empirical papers and reveal specific methodological choices of individual researchers, or groups of researchers sharing the same objectives and questions. This article starts with a different approach. It is based on continuous discussions between four researchers who developed their own version of mobility-driven projects, starting from different disciplinary backgrounds and using different research techniques. By sharing and contrasting personal fieldwork experiences, we reflect on the doings of mobile methodologies. We engage with the mistakes, dilemmas, and (dis)comforts that emerge from our own mobile research practices, and discuss what this implies for relations of power between the researcher and the research participants, and to what extent mobile research can represent the mobility that we seek to study. Specifically, the article addresses three questions: 1) To what extent do we produce different knowledge with our mobile methodologies? 2) How do our smooth writings about methodology relate to the ‘messy’ realities in the field? 3) How do our practices articulate and transcend difference between researchers and research participants? |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-19 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3326 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3326 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3326/3326 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/downloadSuppFile/3326/1265 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ingrid Boas, Joris Schapendonk, Suzy Blondin, Annemiek Pas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Method as Border: Articulating ‘Inclusion/Exclusion’ as an Academic Concern in Migration and Border Research in Europe; 163-146 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817552693935210496 |