Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Poor, Nathaniel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163
Resumo: The questions we can ask currently, building on decades of research, call for advanced methods and understanding. We now have large, complex data sets that require more than complex statistical analysis to yield human answers. Yet as some researchers have pointed out, we also have challenges, especially in computational social science. In a recent project I faced several such challenges and eventually realized that the relevant issues were familiar to users of free and open-source software. I needed a team with diverse skills and knowledge to tackle methods, theories, and topics. We needed to iterate over the entire project: from the initial theories to the data to the methods to the results. We had to understand how to work when some data was freely available but other data that might benefit the research was not. More broadly, computational social scientists may need creative solutions to slippery problems, such as restrictions imposed by terms of service for sites from which we wish to gather data. Are these terms legal, are they enforced, or do our institutional review boards care? Lastly—perhaps most importantly and dauntingly—we may need to challenge laws relating to digital data and access, although so far this conflict has been rare. Can we succeed as open-source advocates have?
id RCAP_d6677fa700fcd3ab508b315eb8ebae15
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3163
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysiscomputational social science; fandom; games; online community; open source; RedditThe questions we can ask currently, building on decades of research, call for advanced methods and understanding. We now have large, complex data sets that require more than complex statistical analysis to yield human answers. Yet as some researchers have pointed out, we also have challenges, especially in computational social science. In a recent project I faced several such challenges and eventually realized that the relevant issues were familiar to users of free and open-source software. I needed a team with diverse skills and knowledge to tackle methods, theories, and topics. We needed to iterate over the entire project: from the initial theories to the data to the methods to the results. We had to understand how to work when some data was freely available but other data that might benefit the research was not. More broadly, computational social scientists may need creative solutions to slippery problems, such as restrictions imposed by terms of service for sites from which we wish to gather data. Are these terms legal, are they enforced, or do our institutional review boards care? Lastly—perhaps most importantly and dauntingly—we may need to challenge laws relating to digital data and access, although so far this conflict has been rare. Can we succeed as open-source advocates have?Cogitatio2020-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3163Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Computational Approaches to Media Entertainment Research; 231-2382183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3163https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3163/3163Copyright (c) 2020 Nathaniel Poorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoor, Nathaniel2022-12-20T10:58:44Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3163Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:07.162671Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
title Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
spellingShingle Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
Poor, Nathaniel
computational social science; fandom; games; online community; open source; Reddit
title_short Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
title_full Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
title_fullStr Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
title_sort Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis
author Poor, Nathaniel
author_facet Poor, Nathaniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Poor, Nathaniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv computational social science; fandom; games; online community; open source; Reddit
topic computational social science; fandom; games; online community; open source; Reddit
description The questions we can ask currently, building on decades of research, call for advanced methods and understanding. We now have large, complex data sets that require more than complex statistical analysis to yield human answers. Yet as some researchers have pointed out, we also have challenges, especially in computational social science. In a recent project I faced several such challenges and eventually realized that the relevant issues were familiar to users of free and open-source software. I needed a team with diverse skills and knowledge to tackle methods, theories, and topics. We needed to iterate over the entire project: from the initial theories to the data to the methods to the results. We had to understand how to work when some data was freely available but other data that might benefit the research was not. More broadly, computational social scientists may need creative solutions to slippery problems, such as restrictions imposed by terms of service for sites from which we wish to gather data. Are these terms legal, are they enforced, or do our institutional review boards care? Lastly—perhaps most importantly and dauntingly—we may need to challenge laws relating to digital data and access, although so far this conflict has been rare. Can we succeed as open-source advocates have?
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3163
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3163
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3163
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3163
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3163/3163
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nathaniel Poor
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nathaniel Poor
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): Computational Approaches to Media Entertainment Research; 231-238
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130658105196544