Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759 https://doi.org/Magalhães, A., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Multi‐source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review. Business and Society Review. 00:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to undertake a systematic literature review (SLR) of empirical research that uses multi‐source methods for collecting data about Ethical Leadership (EL). Research on this sensitive subject benefits from the inclusion of data from more than one source, in order to be better supported, and thus contribute to a deeper understanding of leadership and business ethics issues. The search strategy retrieved a total of 50 multi‐source empirical studies on the topic of EL, published until December 2017. This SLR shows that (a) research on EL has focused mostly on the perceptions of followers, possibly because they are the most accessible target of its outcomes, thus restricting the scope of this body of research; (b) EL is studied mainly through consideration of its consequences, a restriction that hinders explanation of the causal processes involved in ethical leadership, which remains a research arena in need of development. The systematic inclusion of other stakeholders in multi‐source methods is advanced as a way to further develop the field. |
id |
RCAP_d67388780cfa3cdbf5146357fc0acfb6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25759 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature reviewEthical leadershipLiterature reviewMulti-source research designThe aim of this article is to undertake a systematic literature review (SLR) of empirical research that uses multi‐source methods for collecting data about Ethical Leadership (EL). Research on this sensitive subject benefits from the inclusion of data from more than one source, in order to be better supported, and thus contribute to a deeper understanding of leadership and business ethics issues. The search strategy retrieved a total of 50 multi‐source empirical studies on the topic of EL, published until December 2017. This SLR shows that (a) research on EL has focused mostly on the perceptions of followers, possibly because they are the most accessible target of its outcomes, thus restricting the scope of this body of research; (b) EL is studied mainly through consideration of its consequences, a restriction that hinders explanation of the causal processes involved in ethical leadership, which remains a research arena in need of development. The systematic inclusion of other stakeholders in multi‐source methods is advanced as a way to further develop the field.Wiley2019-08-13T09:59:08Z2019-08-132019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759https://doi.org/Magalhães, A., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Multi‐source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review. Business and Society Review. 00:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179engCEFAGEndnrs@uevora.pteonorpais@fpce.uc.pt680Magalhães, Anabelados Santos, Nuno RebeloPais, Leonorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:19:54Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25759Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:16:09.911425Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
title |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
spellingShingle |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review Magalhães, Anabela Ethical leadership Literature review Multi-source research design |
title_short |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
title_full |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
title_fullStr |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
title_sort |
Multi-source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review |
author |
Magalhães, Anabela |
author_facet |
Magalhães, Anabela dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Magalhães, Anabela dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ethical leadership Literature review Multi-source research design |
topic |
Ethical leadership Literature review Multi-source research design |
description |
The aim of this article is to undertake a systematic literature review (SLR) of empirical research that uses multi‐source methods for collecting data about Ethical Leadership (EL). Research on this sensitive subject benefits from the inclusion of data from more than one source, in order to be better supported, and thus contribute to a deeper understanding of leadership and business ethics issues. The search strategy retrieved a total of 50 multi‐source empirical studies on the topic of EL, published until December 2017. This SLR shows that (a) research on EL has focused mostly on the perceptions of followers, possibly because they are the most accessible target of its outcomes, thus restricting the scope of this body of research; (b) EL is studied mainly through consideration of its consequences, a restriction that hinders explanation of the causal processes involved in ethical leadership, which remains a research arena in need of development. The systematic inclusion of other stakeholders in multi‐source methods is advanced as a way to further develop the field. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-13T09:59:08Z 2019-08-13 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759 https://doi.org/Magalhães, A., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Multi‐source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review. Business and Society Review. 00:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759 https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25759 https://doi.org/Magalhães, A., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Multi‐source research designs on ethical leadership: A literature review. Business and Society Review. 00:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
CEFAGE nd nrs@uevora.pt eonorpais@fpce.uc.pt 680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136643476619264 |