Relatório de estágio curricular no Juízo Central Cível do Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa Norte

• Autor(a) principal: Madalena de Matos Fagundes Fino, Bernardino
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/162126
• topic: Princípio do contraditório; Providência autelar; Restituição provisória da posse; Esbulho; Adversarial principle; Precautionary measure; Provisional return of possession; Dispossession; Direito

This report was produced as part of a four-month traineeship at the Central Civil Court of the North Lisbon Judicial District. Based on a preliminary injunction procedure of provisional restitution of possession with which we have been in contact, this work seeks to analyse critically the moment of the adversarial procedure in the scope of the specified preliminary injunction procedure. The analysis is based on Constitutional Court Ruling no. 598/99, which ruled on the constitutionality of Articles 1279 of the Civil Code and Articles 393 and 394 of the 1939 Code of Civil Procedure, in the wording introduced in the 1961 procedural reform (Articles 377 and 378 of the current CPC), which prevent the prior hearing of the evictor, in the light of the adversarial principle and the right to housing enshrined in Article 65 of the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic. As jurisprudence admits the sacrifice of the contradictory prior to the preliminary injunction in cases where the existence of violent eviction is proven, we sought to clarify this concept, analysing the doctrinaire and jurisprudential divergences on this matter. In short, this work seeks to ascertain whether the ex parte nature of this preliminary injunction procedure is an adequate and necessary solution to preserve the effectiveness of the restitution of possession and, furthermore, of the right that it aims to protect.