Camilo and the Construction of the Novel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marinho, Maria de Fátima
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/115536
Resumo: - From his very first novels, CamiloCasteloBranco sought to establish secure codes which,though appearing to subvert implicit rules, were in fact meant to safeguard the legitimacy of hisnarrative discourse while at the same time giving the impression of engaging readers in lightconversation. Thus, the opposition at play between what is true and what appears to be true, as wellas between the forced linearity of reading and discursive transgression take on a relevant role in thework of the author from Seide. This tension promotes the construction of novels that constantly seemto question the validity of the diegetic level when compared to the principles revealed in para texts orwithin the plot. Camilian discourse is thus ironically structured around a continuous ambiguitybetween saying and doing, while its ingredients unequivocally direct the reader towards the interestsof the narrative. Aníbal Pinto de Castro (1976: 47) had already stressed that this process ofmanipulation and the consequent excess of justification are indeed common inCamiloCasteloBrancos narrative and they create an ironic overtone which is hard to ignore. WhenCamilo makes explicit reference to narrative construction processes, he is implicitly alluding tocultural codes that readers are supposed to know and which they will easily identify. Readers arethus in a position to better understand the game they are being invited to play and which works intwo ways: while seemingly legitimizing narrative freedom, it actually reveals observance of the canon.
id RCAP_d87e1a51ab8e17657ff556126f649b3b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/115536
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Camilo and the Construction of the NovelHumanidadesHumanities- From his very first novels, CamiloCasteloBranco sought to establish secure codes which,though appearing to subvert implicit rules, were in fact meant to safeguard the legitimacy of hisnarrative discourse while at the same time giving the impression of engaging readers in lightconversation. Thus, the opposition at play between what is true and what appears to be true, as wellas between the forced linearity of reading and discursive transgression take on a relevant role in thework of the author from Seide. This tension promotes the construction of novels that constantly seemto question the validity of the diegetic level when compared to the principles revealed in para texts orwithin the plot. Camilian discourse is thus ironically structured around a continuous ambiguitybetween saying and doing, while its ingredients unequivocally direct the reader towards the interestsof the narrative. Aníbal Pinto de Castro (1976: 47) had already stressed that this process ofmanipulation and the consequent excess of justification are indeed common inCamiloCasteloBrancos narrative and they create an ironic overtone which is hard to ignore. WhenCamilo makes explicit reference to narrative construction processes, he is implicitly alluding tocultural codes that readers are supposed to know and which they will easily identify. Readers arethus in a position to better understand the game they are being invited to play and which works intwo ways: while seemingly legitimizing narrative freedom, it actually reveals observance of the canon.20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/115536eng0975-4350Marinho, Maria de Fátimainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:02:15Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/115536Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:32:17.675324Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
title Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
spellingShingle Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
Marinho, Maria de Fátima
Humanidades
Humanities
title_short Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
title_full Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
title_fullStr Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
title_full_unstemmed Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
title_sort Camilo and the Construction of the Novel
author Marinho, Maria de Fátima
author_facet Marinho, Maria de Fátima
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marinho, Maria de Fátima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Humanidades
Humanities
topic Humanidades
Humanities
description - From his very first novels, CamiloCasteloBranco sought to establish secure codes which,though appearing to subvert implicit rules, were in fact meant to safeguard the legitimacy of hisnarrative discourse while at the same time giving the impression of engaging readers in lightconversation. Thus, the opposition at play between what is true and what appears to be true, as wellas between the forced linearity of reading and discursive transgression take on a relevant role in thework of the author from Seide. This tension promotes the construction of novels that constantly seemto question the validity of the diegetic level when compared to the principles revealed in para texts orwithin the plot. Camilian discourse is thus ironically structured around a continuous ambiguitybetween saying and doing, while its ingredients unequivocally direct the reader towards the interestsof the narrative. Aníbal Pinto de Castro (1976: 47) had already stressed that this process ofmanipulation and the consequent excess of justification are indeed common inCamiloCasteloBrancos narrative and they create an ironic overtone which is hard to ignore. WhenCamilo makes explicit reference to narrative construction processes, he is implicitly alluding tocultural codes that readers are supposed to know and which they will easily identify. Readers arethus in a position to better understand the game they are being invited to play and which works intwo ways: while seemingly legitimizing narrative freedom, it actually reveals observance of the canon.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/115536
url https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/115536
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0975-4350
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135633023696896