Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Jordana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ivanova, Elena, Ruiz, Salvador, Andrews, Simon, Kelsey, Gavin, Coy, Pilar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576
https://doi.org/Lopes, J.S.; Ivanova, E.;Ruiz, S.; Andrews, S.; Kelsey, G.;Coy, P. Effect of SuperovulationTreatment on Oocyte’s DNAMethylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23,16158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
Resumo: Controlled ovarian stimulation is a necessary step in some assisted reproductive proce-dures allowing a higher collection of female gametes. However, consequences of this stimulationfor the gamete or the offspring have been shown in several mammals. Most studies used compari-sons between oocytes from different donors, which may contribute to different responses. In thiswork, we use the bovine model in which each animal serves as its own control. DNA methylationprofiles were obtained by single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of oocytes from pre-ovu-latory unstimulated follicles compared to oocytes from stimulated follicles. Results show that theglobal percentage of methylation was similar between groups, but the percentage of methylationwas lower for non-stimulated oocytes in the imprinted genes APEG3, MEG3, and MEG9 and higherin TSSC4 when compared to stimulated oocytes. Differences were also found in CGI of imprintedgenes: higher methylation was found among non-stimulated oocytes in MEST (PEG1), IGF2R,GNAS (SCG6), KvDMR1 ICR UMD, and IGF2. In another region around IGF2, the methylation per-centage was lower for non-stimulated oocytes when compared to stimulated oocytes. Data drawnfrom this study might help to understand the molecular reasons for the appearance of certain syn-dromes in assisted reproductive technologies-derived offspring.
id RCAP_daf4baf3d16b7dbb82de518b9edefac5
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/35576
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA MethylationoocyteDNA methylationARTepigeneticsControlled ovarian stimulation is a necessary step in some assisted reproductive proce-dures allowing a higher collection of female gametes. However, consequences of this stimulationfor the gamete or the offspring have been shown in several mammals. Most studies used compari-sons between oocytes from different donors, which may contribute to different responses. In thiswork, we use the bovine model in which each animal serves as its own control. DNA methylationprofiles were obtained by single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of oocytes from pre-ovu-latory unstimulated follicles compared to oocytes from stimulated follicles. Results show that theglobal percentage of methylation was similar between groups, but the percentage of methylationwas lower for non-stimulated oocytes in the imprinted genes APEG3, MEG3, and MEG9 and higherin TSSC4 when compared to stimulated oocytes. Differences were also found in CGI of imprintedgenes: higher methylation was found among non-stimulated oocytes in MEST (PEG1), IGF2R,GNAS (SCG6), KvDMR1 ICR UMD, and IGF2. In another region around IGF2, the methylation per-centage was lower for non-stimulated oocytes when compared to stimulated oocytes. Data drawnfrom this study might help to understand the molecular reasons for the appearance of certain syn-dromes in assisted reproductive technologies-derived offspring.MDPI2023-10-10T08:45:24Z2023-10-102022-12-18T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576https://doi.org/Lopes, J.S.; Ivanova, E.;Ruiz, S.; Andrews, S.; Kelsey, G.;Coy, P. Effect of SuperovulationTreatment on Oocyte’s DNAMethylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23,16158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158porjordana.lopes@uevora.ptndndndndnd206Lopes, JordanaIvanova, ElenaRuiz, SalvadorAndrews, SimonKelsey, GavinCoy, Pilarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:38:06Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/35576Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:23:29.032486Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
title Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
spellingShingle Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
Lopes, Jordana
oocyte
DNA methylation
ART
epigenetics
title_short Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
title_full Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
title_fullStr Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
title_sort Effect of Superovulation Treatment on Oocyte’s DNA Methylation
author Lopes, Jordana
author_facet Lopes, Jordana
Ivanova, Elena
Ruiz, Salvador
Andrews, Simon
Kelsey, Gavin
Coy, Pilar
author_role author
author2 Ivanova, Elena
Ruiz, Salvador
Andrews, Simon
Kelsey, Gavin
Coy, Pilar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Jordana
Ivanova, Elena
Ruiz, Salvador
Andrews, Simon
Kelsey, Gavin
Coy, Pilar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv oocyte
DNA methylation
ART
epigenetics
topic oocyte
DNA methylation
ART
epigenetics
description Controlled ovarian stimulation is a necessary step in some assisted reproductive proce-dures allowing a higher collection of female gametes. However, consequences of this stimulationfor the gamete or the offspring have been shown in several mammals. Most studies used compari-sons between oocytes from different donors, which may contribute to different responses. In thiswork, we use the bovine model in which each animal serves as its own control. DNA methylationprofiles were obtained by single-cell whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of oocytes from pre-ovu-latory unstimulated follicles compared to oocytes from stimulated follicles. Results show that theglobal percentage of methylation was similar between groups, but the percentage of methylationwas lower for non-stimulated oocytes in the imprinted genes APEG3, MEG3, and MEG9 and higherin TSSC4 when compared to stimulated oocytes. Differences were also found in CGI of imprintedgenes: higher methylation was found among non-stimulated oocytes in MEST (PEG1), IGF2R,GNAS (SCG6), KvDMR1 ICR UMD, and IGF2. In another region around IGF2, the methylation per-centage was lower for non-stimulated oocytes when compared to stimulated oocytes. Data drawnfrom this study might help to understand the molecular reasons for the appearance of certain syn-dromes in assisted reproductive technologies-derived offspring.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-18T00:00:00Z
2023-10-10T08:45:24Z
2023-10-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576
https://doi.org/Lopes, J.S.; Ivanova, E.;Ruiz, S.; Andrews, S.; Kelsey, G.;Coy, P. Effect of SuperovulationTreatment on Oocyte’s DNAMethylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23,16158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/35576
https://doi.org/Lopes, J.S.; Ivanova, E.;Ruiz, S.; Andrews, S.; Kelsey, G.;Coy, P. Effect of SuperovulationTreatment on Oocyte’s DNAMethylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23,16158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416158
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv jordana.lopes@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
206
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817550392494391296