Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Spoormans, Lidwine
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Jonge, Wessel de, Czischke, Darinka, Pereira Roders, Ana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998
Resumo: Much of the building stock subjected to the upcoming European Renovation Wave is neither listed as heritage nor considered valuable architecture. This also applies to Dutch housing built between 1965 and 1985, more than 30% of the Dutch housing stock, for which there is no consensus on their cultural significance. Their successful renovation process requires broad support. What attributes do citizens consider significant in their neighbourhood? How do we include a multitude of stakeholders? And can digital methods help collect and process responses? This article reveals significant attributes of residential neighbourhoods from 1965 to 1985, assessed by various stakeholders with a digital tool based on case studies in Amsterdam and Almere. A mobile application allowed individuals to identify significant attributes at various scales while visiting the neighbourhood. By qualitative data analysis of survey and interview results, groups of tangible and intangible attributes were deduced. Results show that identifying attributes by current stakeholders broadens existing expert-led assessments on 1965–1985 neighbourhoods by including, for example, generic attributes not originally intended by the designers. Asking open-ended questions is considered essential to identify undiscovered attributes by alternative stakeholders, although dealing with large numbers of responses is recognised as a challenge to cluster and classify. Lastly, the mobile application appears to be a useful digital tool, but integrating scientific consistency and usability is recommended for further development. Engaging multiple stakeholders with such mobile applications allows for collecting opinions, anticipating conflicts, or shared interests between stakeholders and integration into renovation designs. It can empower citizens to preserve the neighbourhood attributes that are most significant to them.
id RCAP_db224eed208f09a6d7444d59ac94643d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6998
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Toolcultural significance; heritage attributes; housing neighbourhoods; post-Second World War architecture; participationMuch of the building stock subjected to the upcoming European Renovation Wave is neither listed as heritage nor considered valuable architecture. This also applies to Dutch housing built between 1965 and 1985, more than 30% of the Dutch housing stock, for which there is no consensus on their cultural significance. Their successful renovation process requires broad support. What attributes do citizens consider significant in their neighbourhood? How do we include a multitude of stakeholders? And can digital methods help collect and process responses? This article reveals significant attributes of residential neighbourhoods from 1965 to 1985, assessed by various stakeholders with a digital tool based on case studies in Amsterdam and Almere. A mobile application allowed individuals to identify significant attributes at various scales while visiting the neighbourhood. By qualitative data analysis of survey and interview results, groups of tangible and intangible attributes were deduced. Results show that identifying attributes by current stakeholders broadens existing expert-led assessments on 1965–1985 neighbourhoods by including, for example, generic attributes not originally intended by the designers. Asking open-ended questions is considered essential to identify undiscovered attributes by alternative stakeholders, although dealing with large numbers of responses is recognised as a challenge to cluster and classify. Lastly, the mobile application appears to be a useful digital tool, but integrating scientific consistency and usability is recommended for further development. Engaging multiple stakeholders with such mobile applications allows for collecting opinions, anticipating conflicts, or shared interests between stakeholders and integration into renovation designs. It can empower citizens to preserve the neighbourhood attributes that are most significant to them.Cogitatio Press2024-01-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998https://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998Urban Planning; Vol 9 (2024): Citizen Participation, Digital Agency, and Urban Development2183-763510.17645/up.i327reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6998https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6998/3475Copyright (c) 2024 Lidwine Spoormans, Wessel de Jonge, Darinka Czischke, Ana Pereira Rodersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSpoormans, LidwineJonge, Wessel deCzischke, DarinkaPereira Roders, Ana2024-01-18T21:15:19Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6998Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:52:03.368260Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
title Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
spellingShingle Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
Spoormans, Lidwine
cultural significance; heritage attributes; housing neighbourhoods; post-Second World War architecture; participation
title_short Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
title_full Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
title_fullStr Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
title_full_unstemmed Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
title_sort Discovering the Significance of Housing Neighbourhoods by Assessing Their Attributes With a Digital Tool
author Spoormans, Lidwine
author_facet Spoormans, Lidwine
Jonge, Wessel de
Czischke, Darinka
Pereira Roders, Ana
author_role author
author2 Jonge, Wessel de
Czischke, Darinka
Pereira Roders, Ana
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Spoormans, Lidwine
Jonge, Wessel de
Czischke, Darinka
Pereira Roders, Ana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cultural significance; heritage attributes; housing neighbourhoods; post-Second World War architecture; participation
topic cultural significance; heritage attributes; housing neighbourhoods; post-Second World War architecture; participation
description Much of the building stock subjected to the upcoming European Renovation Wave is neither listed as heritage nor considered valuable architecture. This also applies to Dutch housing built between 1965 and 1985, more than 30% of the Dutch housing stock, for which there is no consensus on their cultural significance. Their successful renovation process requires broad support. What attributes do citizens consider significant in their neighbourhood? How do we include a multitude of stakeholders? And can digital methods help collect and process responses? This article reveals significant attributes of residential neighbourhoods from 1965 to 1985, assessed by various stakeholders with a digital tool based on case studies in Amsterdam and Almere. A mobile application allowed individuals to identify significant attributes at various scales while visiting the neighbourhood. By qualitative data analysis of survey and interview results, groups of tangible and intangible attributes were deduced. Results show that identifying attributes by current stakeholders broadens existing expert-led assessments on 1965–1985 neighbourhoods by including, for example, generic attributes not originally intended by the designers. Asking open-ended questions is considered essential to identify undiscovered attributes by alternative stakeholders, although dealing with large numbers of responses is recognised as a challenge to cluster and classify. Lastly, the mobile application appears to be a useful digital tool, but integrating scientific consistency and usability is recommended for further development. Engaging multiple stakeholders with such mobile applications allows for collecting opinions, anticipating conflicts, or shared interests between stakeholders and integration into renovation designs. It can empower citizens to preserve the neighbourhood attributes that are most significant to them.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.6998
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6998
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6998/3475
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Lidwine Spoormans, Wessel de Jonge, Darinka Czischke, Ana Pereira Roders
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Lidwine Spoormans, Wessel de Jonge, Darinka Czischke, Ana Pereira Roders
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 9 (2024): Citizen Participation, Digital Agency, and Urban Development
2183-7635
10.17645/up.i327
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137010851512320