Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54 |
Resumo: | In Michel Pêcheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one. |
id |
RCAP_dd7362a7cdb02e773e7da5f79951f2c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/28 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debateAnálise de discurso aplicada a investigação qualitativa: Perspectiva metodológica em debateDiscourse Analysis; Michel Pêcheux; Research Methodology; Qualitative ResearchAnálise de Discurso; Michel Pêcheux; Metodologia de Investigação; Investigação QualitativaIn Michel Pêcheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one.Na análise de discurso de inspiração pecheutiana não existe um procedimento metodológico preestabelecido, o que pode gerar uma incerteza quanto à sua aplicação. Neste tipo de investigação, são os pressupostos teóricos que determinam os procedimentos metodológicos, ficando a cargo do analista traçar o seu próprio percurso. Porém, nem sempre esse processo é visualizado na investigação. Ao refletir sobre este aspecto, o presente trabalho tem o objetivo de problematizar a existência explícita ou não de uma metodologia de investigação na AD e de identificar os principais elementos metodológicos que são apontados por analistas do discurso. Trata-se de uma investigação bibliográfica de cunho qualitativo, cujo método investigativo é apoiado no materialismo histórico, e o corpus, por seu turno, constituído por seis artigos científicos. O procedimento de análise incluiu a realização de um mapeamento buscando as regularidades e singularidades no material analisado. Os resultados apontam para dois tipos de interpretação metodológica: um de forma genérica, que não explicita o procedimento empregado; e o outro que dá visibilidade ao método. O artigo conclui que é possível descrever um procedimento metodológico de análise, não como aplicação de uma técnica, mas como um processo de investigação em que o dispositivo teórico é indissociável do analítico.Ludomedia2020-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 40-54New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 40-54New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 40-542184-777010.36367/ntqr.4.2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/28https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/28/23Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha DuroPaula, Marlubia CorreaHirai, Wanda Griepinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-13T09:11:59Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/28Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:47:53.836697Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate Análise de discurso aplicada a investigação qualitativa: Perspectiva metodológica em debate |
title |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
spellingShingle |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha Duro Discourse Analysis; Michel Pêcheux; Research Methodology; Qualitative Research Análise de Discurso; Michel Pêcheux; Metodologia de Investigação; Investigação Qualitativa |
title_short |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
title_full |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
title_fullStr |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
title_sort |
Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate |
author |
Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha Duro |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha Duro Paula, Marlubia Correa Hirai, Wanda Griep |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paula, Marlubia Correa Hirai, Wanda Griep |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha Duro Paula, Marlubia Correa Hirai, Wanda Griep |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discourse Analysis; Michel Pêcheux; Research Methodology; Qualitative Research Análise de Discurso; Michel Pêcheux; Metodologia de Investigação; Investigação Qualitativa |
topic |
Discourse Analysis; Michel Pêcheux; Research Methodology; Qualitative Research Análise de Discurso; Michel Pêcheux; Metodologia de Investigação; Investigação Qualitativa |
description |
In Michel Pêcheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54 https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/28 https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/28/23 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludomedia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges; 40-54 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales: avances y desafíos; 40-54 New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 4 (2020): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios; 40-54 2184-7770 10.36367/ntqr.4.2020 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130346250305536 |