Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Marta C.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Sónia C., Nicolet, Katia J., Côté, Isabelle M., Bshary, Redouan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2371
Resumo: Cooperation theory puts a strong emphasis on partner control mechanisms that have evolved to stabilize cooperation against the temptation of cheating. The marine cleaning mutualism between the Indo-Pacific bluestreack cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, and its reef fish ‘clients’ has been a model system to study partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies. These cleaners cooperate by eating ectoparasites; however, they can cheat by taking client mucus, which they prefer. Such a conflict may be the exception. For example, Caribbean cleaning gobies, Elacatinus spp., prefer to eat ectoparasites instead of mucus. While partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies seem to be absent in cleaning gobies, no study has directly compared cleaner wrasses and cleaning gobies by using the same methods. We examined systematic differences in cleaning interaction patterns and strategic behaviour exhibited by 12 closely related parrotfish species in the two systems. Parrotfish seeking cleaner wrasses visited them more often and spent more time with their cleaner than parrotfish seeking cleaning gobies. Moreover, the clients of cleaner wrasses returned more often to the same cleaner following a positive interaction, whereas the clients of cleaning gobies were less influenced by the outcome of previous interactions. We hypothesize that the higher frequency and repeated nature of interactions observed in the cleaner wrasse system, combined with the need to resolve conflicts, might have been prerequisites for the development of complex behavioural strategies.
id RCAP_dd955b3e97f14b4f9a27eed8647ac6ec
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/2371
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do notBehavioural strategyConflictCooperationElacatinus spp.Labroides dimidiatusMutualismParrotfishPartner choiceCooperation theory puts a strong emphasis on partner control mechanisms that have evolved to stabilize cooperation against the temptation of cheating. The marine cleaning mutualism between the Indo-Pacific bluestreack cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, and its reef fish ‘clients’ has been a model system to study partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies. These cleaners cooperate by eating ectoparasites; however, they can cheat by taking client mucus, which they prefer. Such a conflict may be the exception. For example, Caribbean cleaning gobies, Elacatinus spp., prefer to eat ectoparasites instead of mucus. While partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies seem to be absent in cleaning gobies, no study has directly compared cleaner wrasses and cleaning gobies by using the same methods. We examined systematic differences in cleaning interaction patterns and strategic behaviour exhibited by 12 closely related parrotfish species in the two systems. Parrotfish seeking cleaner wrasses visited them more often and spent more time with their cleaner than parrotfish seeking cleaning gobies. Moreover, the clients of cleaner wrasses returned more often to the same cleaner following a positive interaction, whereas the clients of cleaning gobies were less influenced by the outcome of previous interactions. We hypothesize that the higher frequency and repeated nature of interactions observed in the cleaner wrasse system, combined with the need to resolve conflicts, might have been prerequisites for the development of complex behavioural strategies.ElsevierRepositório do ISPASoares, Marta C.Cardoso, Sónia C.Nicolet, Katia J.Côté, Isabelle M.Bshary, Redouan2013-09-21T10:33:27Z2013-01-01T00:00:00Z2013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2371engAnimal Behaviour 86, 611-6150003-3472info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:38:17Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/2371Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:20:21.476016Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
title Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
spellingShingle Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
Soares, Marta C.
Behavioural strategy
Conflict
Cooperation
Elacatinus spp.
Labroides dimidiatus
Mutualism
Parrotfish
Partner choice
title_short Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
title_full Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
title_fullStr Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
title_full_unstemmed Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
title_sort Indo-Pacific parrotfish exert partner choice in interactions cleanerfish but Caribbean parrotfish do not
author Soares, Marta C.
author_facet Soares, Marta C.
Cardoso, Sónia C.
Nicolet, Katia J.
Côté, Isabelle M.
Bshary, Redouan
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Sónia C.
Nicolet, Katia J.
Côté, Isabelle M.
Bshary, Redouan
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Marta C.
Cardoso, Sónia C.
Nicolet, Katia J.
Côté, Isabelle M.
Bshary, Redouan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Behavioural strategy
Conflict
Cooperation
Elacatinus spp.
Labroides dimidiatus
Mutualism
Parrotfish
Partner choice
topic Behavioural strategy
Conflict
Cooperation
Elacatinus spp.
Labroides dimidiatus
Mutualism
Parrotfish
Partner choice
description Cooperation theory puts a strong emphasis on partner control mechanisms that have evolved to stabilize cooperation against the temptation of cheating. The marine cleaning mutualism between the Indo-Pacific bluestreack cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, and its reef fish ‘clients’ has been a model system to study partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies. These cleaners cooperate by eating ectoparasites; however, they can cheat by taking client mucus, which they prefer. Such a conflict may be the exception. For example, Caribbean cleaning gobies, Elacatinus spp., prefer to eat ectoparasites instead of mucus. While partner control mechanisms and counterstrategies seem to be absent in cleaning gobies, no study has directly compared cleaner wrasses and cleaning gobies by using the same methods. We examined systematic differences in cleaning interaction patterns and strategic behaviour exhibited by 12 closely related parrotfish species in the two systems. Parrotfish seeking cleaner wrasses visited them more often and spent more time with their cleaner than parrotfish seeking cleaning gobies. Moreover, the clients of cleaner wrasses returned more often to the same cleaner following a positive interaction, whereas the clients of cleaning gobies were less influenced by the outcome of previous interactions. We hypothesize that the higher frequency and repeated nature of interactions observed in the cleaner wrasse system, combined with the need to resolve conflicts, might have been prerequisites for the development of complex behavioural strategies.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-21T10:33:27Z
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2371
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2371
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Behaviour 86, 611-615
0003-3472
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130064599646208