Health Care in Federal Systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fierlbeck, Katherine
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706
Resumo: How do multilevel health care systems evolve? Do they develop in a similar manner, or are their respective paths of evolution more sui generis? The aim of this article is to compare the way in which Canada and the European Union have attempted to coordinate health policy between their component multilevel jurisdictions over time. This article argues that the EU—despite its limited authority over health care—has been better able than Canada to develop a greater capacity for addressing health policy at a supranational level, notwithstanding Canada’s greater federal involvement in financing health care. While the experience of the EU supports the theoretical premises of neofunctionalism (that a certain level of integration will induce even greater integration in other areas, especially in response to crisis), the experience of Canadian health care federalism does not fit that theoretical paradigm. This suggests a limited applicability for neofunctionalist theory across multilevel systems more widely.
id RCAP_de22faecafd2da0af689bce85861dbc4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6706
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Health Care in Federal SystemsCanada; Covid‐19; European Union; federalism; health care; health policy; neofunctionalismHow do multilevel health care systems evolve? Do they develop in a similar manner, or are their respective paths of evolution more sui generis? The aim of this article is to compare the way in which Canada and the European Union have attempted to coordinate health policy between their component multilevel jurisdictions over time. This article argues that the EU—despite its limited authority over health care—has been better able than Canada to develop a greater capacity for addressing health policy at a supranational level, notwithstanding Canada’s greater federal involvement in financing health care. While the experience of the EU supports the theoretical premises of neofunctionalism (that a certain level of integration will induce even greater integration in other areas, especially in response to crisis), the experience of Canadian health care federalism does not fit that theoretical paradigm. This suggests a limited applicability for neofunctionalist theory across multilevel systems more widely.Cogitatio Press2023-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 289-2992183-246310.17645/pag.i360reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6706https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6706/3269Copyright (c) 2023 Katherine Fierlbeckinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFierlbeck, Katherine2023-11-23T15:15:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6706Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:38.388478Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health Care in Federal Systems
title Health Care in Federal Systems
spellingShingle Health Care in Federal Systems
Fierlbeck, Katherine
Canada; Covid‐19; European Union; federalism; health care; health policy; neofunctionalism
title_short Health Care in Federal Systems
title_full Health Care in Federal Systems
title_fullStr Health Care in Federal Systems
title_full_unstemmed Health Care in Federal Systems
title_sort Health Care in Federal Systems
author Fierlbeck, Katherine
author_facet Fierlbeck, Katherine
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fierlbeck, Katherine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Canada; Covid‐19; European Union; federalism; health care; health policy; neofunctionalism
topic Canada; Covid‐19; European Union; federalism; health care; health policy; neofunctionalism
description How do multilevel health care systems evolve? Do they develop in a similar manner, or are their respective paths of evolution more sui generis? The aim of this article is to compare the way in which Canada and the European Union have attempted to coordinate health policy between their component multilevel jurisdictions over time. This article argues that the EU—despite its limited authority over health care—has been better able than Canada to develop a greater capacity for addressing health policy at a supranational level, notwithstanding Canada’s greater federal involvement in financing health care. While the experience of the EU supports the theoretical premises of neofunctionalism (that a certain level of integration will induce even greater integration in other areas, especially in response to crisis), the experience of Canadian health care federalism does not fit that theoretical paradigm. This suggests a limited applicability for neofunctionalist theory across multilevel systems more widely.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6706
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6706
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6706/3269
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Katherine Fierlbeck
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Katherine Fierlbeck
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies; 289-299
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i360
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133584103047168