Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10611 |
Resumo: | The goal of this study is to examine the argumentative functions of concessive yes, but… constructions. Based on (N?=?22) interview transcripts, we examine the ways environmental activists negotiate their agreements and disagreements over climate change through yes, but… constructions. Starting from conversational analyses of such concessive sequences, we develop an account grounded in argumentative discourse analysis, notably pragma-dialectics. The analysis focuses on how in conceding arguments speakers re-present others’ discourse, what types of criticism they exercise through particular sequential patterns and which argumentative techniques they saliently use. We show in particular that, in disputing the standpoints supported by the complex argumentation they encounter, speakers raise different types of criticism (sufficiency, relevance, acceptability). We discuss how examining not only the sequencing of agreements and disagreements, but also the argumentative relations that generate these, may extend our understanding of such concessive constructions. |
id |
RCAP_de4f577f6eccc1419f48f82b8e42ff60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10611 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysisAgreement prefacesArgumentation analysisClimate changeConcessionDisagreementDissociationPragma-dialecticsRelevanceSufficiencyThe goal of this study is to examine the argumentative functions of concessive yes, but… constructions. Based on (N?=?22) interview transcripts, we examine the ways environmental activists negotiate their agreements and disagreements over climate change through yes, but… constructions. Starting from conversational analyses of such concessive sequences, we develop an account grounded in argumentative discourse analysis, notably pragma-dialectics. The analysis focuses on how in conceding arguments speakers re-present others’ discourse, what types of criticism they exercise through particular sequential patterns and which argumentative techniques they saliently use. We show in particular that, in disputing the standpoints supported by the complex argumentation they encounter, speakers raise different types of criticism (sufficiency, relevance, acceptability). We discuss how examining not only the sequencing of agreements and disagreements, but also the argumentative relations that generate these, may extend our understanding of such concessive constructions.Sage Publications2016-01-13T12:47:30Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152019-05-10T11:23:28Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/10611eng1461-445610.1177/1461445615578965Uzelgun, M.Mohamed, D.Lewinski, M.Castro, P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:43:11Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10611Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:20:17.953194Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
title |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
spellingShingle |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis Uzelgun, M. Agreement prefaces Argumentation analysis Climate change Concession Disagreement Dissociation Pragma-dialectics Relevance Sufficiency |
title_short |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
title_full |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
title_fullStr |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
title_sort |
Managing disagreement through yes, but… constructions: an argumentative analysis |
author |
Uzelgun, M. |
author_facet |
Uzelgun, M. Mohamed, D. Lewinski, M. Castro, P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mohamed, D. Lewinski, M. Castro, P. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Uzelgun, M. Mohamed, D. Lewinski, M. Castro, P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agreement prefaces Argumentation analysis Climate change Concession Disagreement Dissociation Pragma-dialectics Relevance Sufficiency |
topic |
Agreement prefaces Argumentation analysis Climate change Concession Disagreement Dissociation Pragma-dialectics Relevance Sufficiency |
description |
The goal of this study is to examine the argumentative functions of concessive yes, but… constructions. Based on (N?=?22) interview transcripts, we examine the ways environmental activists negotiate their agreements and disagreements over climate change through yes, but… constructions. Starting from conversational analyses of such concessive sequences, we develop an account grounded in argumentative discourse analysis, notably pragma-dialectics. The analysis focuses on how in conceding arguments speakers re-present others’ discourse, what types of criticism they exercise through particular sequential patterns and which argumentative techniques they saliently use. We show in particular that, in disputing the standpoints supported by the complex argumentation they encounter, speakers raise different types of criticism (sufficiency, relevance, acceptability). We discuss how examining not only the sequencing of agreements and disagreements, but also the argumentative relations that generate these, may extend our understanding of such concessive constructions. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2015 2016-01-13T12:47:30Z 2019-05-10T11:23:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10611 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10611 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1461-4456 10.1177/1461445615578965 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134762920574976 |