Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leolini, Luisa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Costafreda-Aumedes, Sergi, Santos, J. A., Menz, Christoph, Fraga, Helder, Molitor, Daniel, Merante, Paolo, Junk, Jürgen, Kartschall, Thomas, Destrac-Irvine, Agnès, van Leeuwen, Cornelis, C. Malheiro, Aureliano, Eiras-Dias, José, Silvestre, José, Dibari, Camilla, Bindi, Marco, Moriondo, Marco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10914
Resumo: Budbreak date in grapevine is strictly dependent on temperature, and the correct simulation of its occurrence is of great interest since it may have major consequences on the final yield and quality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability for budbreak simulation of two modeling approaches, the chilling-forcing (CF), which describes the entire dormancy period (endo- and eco-dormancy) and the forcing approach (F), which only describes the eco-dormancy. For this, we selected six phenological models that apply CF and F in different ways, which were tested on budbreak simulation of eight grapevine varieties cultivated at different latitudes in Europe. Although none of the compared models showed a clear supremacy over the others, models based on CF showed a generally higher estimation accuracy than F where fixed starting dates were adopted. In the latter models, the accurate simulation of budbreak was dependent on the selection of the starting date for forcing accumulation that changes according to the latitude, whereas CF models were independent. Indeed, distinct thermal requirements were found for the grapevine varieties cultivated in Northern and Southern Europe. This implies the need to improve modeling of the dormancy period to avoid under- or over-estimations of budbreak date under different environmental conditions.
id RCAP_de6fd86a9dfa51dd2b7fdd75810da78d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10914
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europechilling-forcing modelsdormancyBudbreak date in grapevine is strictly dependent on temperature, and the correct simulation of its occurrence is of great interest since it may have major consequences on the final yield and quality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability for budbreak simulation of two modeling approaches, the chilling-forcing (CF), which describes the entire dormancy period (endo- and eco-dormancy) and the forcing approach (F), which only describes the eco-dormancy. For this, we selected six phenological models that apply CF and F in different ways, which were tested on budbreak simulation of eight grapevine varieties cultivated at different latitudes in Europe. Although none of the compared models showed a clear supremacy over the others, models based on CF showed a generally higher estimation accuracy than F where fixed starting dates were adopted. In the latter models, the accurate simulation of budbreak was dependent on the selection of the starting date for forcing accumulation that changes according to the latitude, whereas CF models were independent. Indeed, distinct thermal requirements were found for the grapevine varieties cultivated in Northern and Southern Europe. This implies the need to improve modeling of the dormancy period to avoid under- or over-estimations of budbreak date under different environmental conditions.2021-12-21T14:52:56Z2020-01-01T00:00:00Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10348/10914eng2076-3417Leolini, LuisaCostafreda-Aumedes, SergiSantos, J. A.Menz, ChristophFraga, HelderMolitor, DanielMerante, PaoloJunk, JürgenKartschall, ThomasDestrac-Irvine, Agnèsvan Leeuwen, CornelisC. Malheiro, AurelianoEiras-Dias, JoséSilvestre, JoséDibari, CamillaBindi, MarcoMoriondo, Marcoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-02T12:59:18Zoai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10914Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:06:58.231802Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
title Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
spellingShingle Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
Leolini, Luisa
chilling-forcing models
dormancy
title_short Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
title_full Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
title_fullStr Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
title_sort Phenological Model Intercomparison for Estimating Grapevine Budbreak Date (Vitis vinifera L.) in Europe
author Leolini, Luisa
author_facet Leolini, Luisa
Costafreda-Aumedes, Sergi
Santos, J. A.
Menz, Christoph
Fraga, Helder
Molitor, Daniel
Merante, Paolo
Junk, Jürgen
Kartschall, Thomas
Destrac-Irvine, Agnès
van Leeuwen, Cornelis
C. Malheiro, Aureliano
Eiras-Dias, José
Silvestre, José
Dibari, Camilla
Bindi, Marco
Moriondo, Marco
author_role author
author2 Costafreda-Aumedes, Sergi
Santos, J. A.
Menz, Christoph
Fraga, Helder
Molitor, Daniel
Merante, Paolo
Junk, Jürgen
Kartschall, Thomas
Destrac-Irvine, Agnès
van Leeuwen, Cornelis
C. Malheiro, Aureliano
Eiras-Dias, José
Silvestre, José
Dibari, Camilla
Bindi, Marco
Moriondo, Marco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leolini, Luisa
Costafreda-Aumedes, Sergi
Santos, J. A.
Menz, Christoph
Fraga, Helder
Molitor, Daniel
Merante, Paolo
Junk, Jürgen
Kartschall, Thomas
Destrac-Irvine, Agnès
van Leeuwen, Cornelis
C. Malheiro, Aureliano
Eiras-Dias, José
Silvestre, José
Dibari, Camilla
Bindi, Marco
Moriondo, Marco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv chilling-forcing models
dormancy
topic chilling-forcing models
dormancy
description Budbreak date in grapevine is strictly dependent on temperature, and the correct simulation of its occurrence is of great interest since it may have major consequences on the final yield and quality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability for budbreak simulation of two modeling approaches, the chilling-forcing (CF), which describes the entire dormancy period (endo- and eco-dormancy) and the forcing approach (F), which only describes the eco-dormancy. For this, we selected six phenological models that apply CF and F in different ways, which were tested on budbreak simulation of eight grapevine varieties cultivated at different latitudes in Europe. Although none of the compared models showed a clear supremacy over the others, models based on CF showed a generally higher estimation accuracy than F where fixed starting dates were adopted. In the latter models, the accurate simulation of budbreak was dependent on the selection of the starting date for forcing accumulation that changes according to the latitude, whereas CF models were independent. Indeed, distinct thermal requirements were found for the grapevine varieties cultivated in Northern and Southern Europe. This implies the need to improve modeling of the dormancy period to avoid under- or over-estimations of budbreak date under different environmental conditions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020
2021-12-21T14:52:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10914
url http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10914
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2076-3417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137157932122112