Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nadia Steils
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31
Resumo: Abstract: This paper presents the qualitative experiment as an alternative methodological solution that combines an open qualitative approach, and a structured and controlled experiment. Using three studies, including both a qualitative experiment and a traditional in-depth interviews approach, we compare the findings of both approaches to identify the benefits and risks of qualitative experiments. Our findings contribute by presenting a methodological framework and technical recommendations based on three validity criteria (internal, external, and interpretivist validity). The results thereby contribute methodologically by empirically investigating the usefulness of qualitative experiments based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative validity criteria identified in the literature.
id RCAP_df5d7a7808355fc0f01a7e3966a4c3f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/274
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciencesqualitative experiments, validity criteria, methodology, qualitative researchAbstract: This paper presents the qualitative experiment as an alternative methodological solution that combines an open qualitative approach, and a structured and controlled experiment. Using three studies, including both a qualitative experiment and a traditional in-depth interviews approach, we compare the findings of both approaches to identify the benefits and risks of qualitative experiments. Our findings contribute by presenting a methodological framework and technical recommendations based on three validity criteria (internal, external, and interpretivist validity). The results thereby contribute methodologically by empirically investigating the usefulness of qualitative experiments based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative validity criteria identified in the literature.Ludomedia2021-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-31New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-31New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-312184-777010.36367/ntqr.6.2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/274https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/274/289Nadia Steilsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-13T09:12:46Zoai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/274Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:48:05.783439Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
title Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
spellingShingle Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
Nadia Steils
qualitative experiments, validity criteria, methodology, qualitative research
title_short Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
title_full Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
title_fullStr Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
title_sort Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences
author Nadia Steils
author_facet Nadia Steils
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nadia Steils
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv qualitative experiments, validity criteria, methodology, qualitative research
topic qualitative experiments, validity criteria, methodology, qualitative research
description Abstract: This paper presents the qualitative experiment as an alternative methodological solution that combines an open qualitative approach, and a structured and controlled experiment. Using three studies, including both a qualitative experiment and a traditional in-depth interviews approach, we compare the findings of both approaches to identify the benefits and risks of qualitative experiments. Our findings contribute by presenting a methodological framework and technical recommendations based on three validity criteria (internal, external, and interpretivist validity). The results thereby contribute methodologically by empirically investigating the usefulness of qualitative experiments based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative validity criteria identified in the literature.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-12
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31
url https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/274
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/274/289
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-31
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-31
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 6 (2021): Qualitative Research: Practices and Challenges; 24-31
2184-7770
10.36367/ntqr.6.2021
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130348055953408