Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Disterheft, Antje
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Azeiteiro, Ulisses, Leal Filho, Walter, Caeiro, Sandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/11137
Resumo: Purpose – This paper aims to connect participatory sustainability implementation with sustainability assessment, exploring learning theories, the principles of Higher Education for Sustainable Development (HESD) and respective indicators applied in the university context. Even though participation is partly considered in existing assessment practices, it is still unclear what and how to measure participatory processes that envision implementing sustainability principles in higher education institutions. Holistic approaches are often proclaimed, but reductionist assessment methods are frequently followed. Design/methodology/approach – The study followed a qualitative approach, inspired by the Delphi method, and includes semi-structured expert interviews (N 15) and two focus group discussions (N 23), with participants coming from a total of 17 different countries. Data were analysed and compared according to qualitative content analysis and systemized according to the underlying theoretical strands. Findings – The findings suggest that participatory processes can be better assessed from a social learning and organisational learning perspective, emphasizing non-linear criteria for the quality of the process in terms of depth and meaningfulness as well as criteria for the quality of the outcome in terms of knowledge generation and innovation. The findings also point implicitly to the need of considering double- and triple-loop learning, if a culture of participation towards sustainability is to be pursued, and underline the high impact of institutional governance. Originality/value – Although a great volume of literature about sustainability implementation in higher education exists, studies focusing on participatory processes in this context are rather scarce. This research pays attention to sustainability experts working in universities rarely heard in a more systemic manner and also applies a reflective participatory approach itself by using qualitative methods.
id RCAP_df8f39992716b71239a64461e60170da
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/11137
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?Qualitative analysisAssessment criteriaHigher education for sustainable development (HESD)Learning theoriesParticipatory processesODS::04:Educação de QualidadeODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades SustentáveisODS::12:Produção e Consumo SustentáveisODS::17:Parcerias para a Implementação dos ObjetivosPurpose – This paper aims to connect participatory sustainability implementation with sustainability assessment, exploring learning theories, the principles of Higher Education for Sustainable Development (HESD) and respective indicators applied in the university context. Even though participation is partly considered in existing assessment practices, it is still unclear what and how to measure participatory processes that envision implementing sustainability principles in higher education institutions. Holistic approaches are often proclaimed, but reductionist assessment methods are frequently followed. Design/methodology/approach – The study followed a qualitative approach, inspired by the Delphi method, and includes semi-structured expert interviews (N 15) and two focus group discussions (N 23), with participants coming from a total of 17 different countries. Data were analysed and compared according to qualitative content analysis and systemized according to the underlying theoretical strands. Findings – The findings suggest that participatory processes can be better assessed from a social learning and organisational learning perspective, emphasizing non-linear criteria for the quality of the process in terms of depth and meaningfulness as well as criteria for the quality of the outcome in terms of knowledge generation and innovation. The findings also point implicitly to the need of considering double- and triple-loop learning, if a culture of participation towards sustainability is to be pursued, and underline the high impact of institutional governance. Originality/value – Although a great volume of literature about sustainability implementation in higher education exists, studies focusing on participatory processes in this context are rather scarce. This research pays attention to sustainability experts working in universities rarely heard in a more systemic manner and also applies a reflective participatory approach itself by using qualitative methods.Repositório AbertoDisterheft, AntjeAzeiteiro, UlissesLeal Filho, WalterCaeiro, Sandra2021-09-29T08:02:58Z2015-09-072021-09-20T09:18:55Z2015-09-07T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/11137eng1467-6370cv-prod-187525210.1108/ijshe-05-2014-0079info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T15:37:59Zoai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/11137Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:50:36.439544Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
title Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
spellingShingle Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
Disterheft, Antje
Qualitative analysis
Assessment criteria
Higher education for sustainable development (HESD)
Learning theories
Participatory processes
ODS::04:Educação de Qualidade
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::12:Produção e Consumo Sustentáveis
ODS::17:Parcerias para a Implementação dos Objetivos
title_short Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
title_full Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
title_fullStr Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
title_full_unstemmed Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
title_sort Participatory processes in sustainable universities: what to assess?
author Disterheft, Antje
author_facet Disterheft, Antje
Azeiteiro, Ulisses
Leal Filho, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
author_role author
author2 Azeiteiro, Ulisses
Leal Filho, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Aberto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Disterheft, Antje
Azeiteiro, Ulisses
Leal Filho, Walter
Caeiro, Sandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Qualitative analysis
Assessment criteria
Higher education for sustainable development (HESD)
Learning theories
Participatory processes
ODS::04:Educação de Qualidade
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::12:Produção e Consumo Sustentáveis
ODS::17:Parcerias para a Implementação dos Objetivos
topic Qualitative analysis
Assessment criteria
Higher education for sustainable development (HESD)
Learning theories
Participatory processes
ODS::04:Educação de Qualidade
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::12:Produção e Consumo Sustentáveis
ODS::17:Parcerias para a Implementação dos Objetivos
description Purpose – This paper aims to connect participatory sustainability implementation with sustainability assessment, exploring learning theories, the principles of Higher Education for Sustainable Development (HESD) and respective indicators applied in the university context. Even though participation is partly considered in existing assessment practices, it is still unclear what and how to measure participatory processes that envision implementing sustainability principles in higher education institutions. Holistic approaches are often proclaimed, but reductionist assessment methods are frequently followed. Design/methodology/approach – The study followed a qualitative approach, inspired by the Delphi method, and includes semi-structured expert interviews (N 15) and two focus group discussions (N 23), with participants coming from a total of 17 different countries. Data were analysed and compared according to qualitative content analysis and systemized according to the underlying theoretical strands. Findings – The findings suggest that participatory processes can be better assessed from a social learning and organisational learning perspective, emphasizing non-linear criteria for the quality of the process in terms of depth and meaningfulness as well as criteria for the quality of the outcome in terms of knowledge generation and innovation. The findings also point implicitly to the need of considering double- and triple-loop learning, if a culture of participation towards sustainability is to be pursued, and underline the high impact of institutional governance. Originality/value – Although a great volume of literature about sustainability implementation in higher education exists, studies focusing on participatory processes in this context are rather scarce. This research pays attention to sustainability experts working in universities rarely heard in a more systemic manner and also applies a reflective participatory approach itself by using qualitative methods.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-07
2015-09-07T00:00:00Z
2021-09-29T08:02:58Z
2021-09-20T09:18:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/11137
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/11137
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1467-6370
cv-prod-1875252
10.1108/ijshe-05-2014-0079
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135094403760128