Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso,Rita Matos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Jardim,Joana Godinho, Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016
Resumo: Abstrac Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the surface treatment and adhesive system on the shear bond strength and the failure mode of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate surfaces. Methods: Ninety metal brackets (n=15) were bonded to aged discs of polymethylmethacrylate SR Ivocron subjected to three surface conditions (no treatment; sandblasting with 50-μm aluminum oxide; roughening with a tungsten bur), using two combinations of adhesives (methylmethacrylate monomer + Transbond XT Primer; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) followed by the composite Transbond XT. In the control group, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to 15 human mandibular incisors. The specimens were thermocycled, stored in distilled water (37oC, 7 days), and tested in shear, using an Instron universal machine. Failure mode was classified according to the adhesive remnant index using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with an analysis of variance and posthoc tests (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between the bracket bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate with different surface treatments (p<0.001). Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was superior to tungsten bur roughening. The adhesive system did not significantly influence the shear bond strength nor the failure mode (p=0.8415). All experimental groups showed lower bond strengths than the control group (p=0.1566). Conclusions: Mechanical surface treatment significantly influenced the bracket’s bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was the most effective mechanical treatment. The weakest adhesive link was found at the acrylic-adhesive interface. Orthodontic bonding to polymethylmethacrylate was weaker than bonding to enamel, regardless of the surface treatment and the adhesive used.
id RCAP_dff66ae4c7395fb6666270d6148e2d60
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-28902021000100016
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive systemAdhesionAdhesive remnant indexAdhesivesBracketsOrthodonticsPolymethylmethacrylateShear strengthSurface treatmentAbstrac Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the surface treatment and adhesive system on the shear bond strength and the failure mode of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate surfaces. Methods: Ninety metal brackets (n=15) were bonded to aged discs of polymethylmethacrylate SR Ivocron subjected to three surface conditions (no treatment; sandblasting with 50-μm aluminum oxide; roughening with a tungsten bur), using two combinations of adhesives (methylmethacrylate monomer + Transbond XT Primer; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) followed by the composite Transbond XT. In the control group, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to 15 human mandibular incisors. The specimens were thermocycled, stored in distilled water (37oC, 7 days), and tested in shear, using an Instron universal machine. Failure mode was classified according to the adhesive remnant index using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with an analysis of variance and posthoc tests (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between the bracket bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate with different surface treatments (p<0.001). Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was superior to tungsten bur roughening. The adhesive system did not significantly influence the shear bond strength nor the failure mode (p=0.8415). All experimental groups showed lower bond strengths than the control group (p=0.1566). Conclusions: Mechanical surface treatment significantly influenced the bracket’s bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was the most effective mechanical treatment. The weakest adhesive link was found at the acrylic-adhesive interface. Orthodontic bonding to polymethylmethacrylate was weaker than bonding to enamel, regardless of the surface treatment and the adhesive used.Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial v.62 n.1 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016Cardoso,Rita MatosJardim,Joana Godinho, Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:21:08Zoai:scielo:S1646-28902021000100016Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:28:15.750508Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
title Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
spellingShingle Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
Cardoso,Rita Matos
Adhesion
Adhesive remnant index
Adhesives
Brackets
Orthodontics
Polymethylmethacrylate
Shear strength
Surface treatment
title_short Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
title_full Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
title_fullStr Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
title_sort Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system
author Cardoso,Rita Matos
author_facet Cardoso,Rita Matos
Jardim,Joana Godinho, Luís
author_role author
author2 Jardim,Joana Godinho, Luís
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso,Rita Matos
Jardim,Joana Godinho, Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesion
Adhesive remnant index
Adhesives
Brackets
Orthodontics
Polymethylmethacrylate
Shear strength
Surface treatment
topic Adhesion
Adhesive remnant index
Adhesives
Brackets
Orthodontics
Polymethylmethacrylate
Shear strength
Surface treatment
description Abstrac Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the surface treatment and adhesive system on the shear bond strength and the failure mode of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate surfaces. Methods: Ninety metal brackets (n=15) were bonded to aged discs of polymethylmethacrylate SR Ivocron subjected to three surface conditions (no treatment; sandblasting with 50-μm aluminum oxide; roughening with a tungsten bur), using two combinations of adhesives (methylmethacrylate monomer + Transbond XT Primer; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) followed by the composite Transbond XT. In the control group, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to 15 human mandibular incisors. The specimens were thermocycled, stored in distilled water (37oC, 7 days), and tested in shear, using an Instron universal machine. Failure mode was classified according to the adhesive remnant index using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with an analysis of variance and posthoc tests (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences were found between the bracket bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate with different surface treatments (p<0.001). Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was superior to tungsten bur roughening. The adhesive system did not significantly influence the shear bond strength nor the failure mode (p=0.8415). All experimental groups showed lower bond strengths than the control group (p=0.1566). Conclusions: Mechanical surface treatment significantly influenced the bracket’s bond strength to polymethylmethacrylate. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide was the most effective mechanical treatment. The weakest adhesive link was found at the acrylic-adhesive interface. Orthodontic bonding to polymethylmethacrylate was weaker than bonding to enamel, regardless of the surface treatment and the adhesive used.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial v.62 n.1 2021
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137352938946560