Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369 |
Resumo: | With the exponential growth of international travel over the last decades, the question of travellers’ health has taken on a crucial importance. International tourism, occupational travel and migratory fluxes have all contributed to this phenomenon which has drawn the attention of international organizations and national authorities on the risks associated with the spread of infectious diseases. The increasing concerns over emerging and re-emerging diseases has raised the global profile of travel medicine, urging the setting of quality standards in clinical practice and service delivery to travellers. The present study aimed to obtain a broad consensus on quality assessment criteria for pre-travel advice among practitioners in Portugal and Brazil based upon the Delphi method, using international criteria and standards and scientific studies as benchmarks. Our proposed model which integrates the consensual criteria obtained in our study, identified differences in quality criteria between the two expert groups. Nevertheless, they did highlight the importance attributed to qualified human resources, the quality of information for travelers and health professionals, and timely diagnosis, amongst others. The cases of Portugal and Brazil discussed here, underscore the need for more studies on the quality of pre- and post-travel consultations at national and transnational level. |
id |
RCAP_e14d23366044775b204decb8b3baea3e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.anaisihmt.com:article/369 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensusCritérios de qualidade nas consultas pré-viagem: um consenso DelphiWith the exponential growth of international travel over the last decades, the question of travellers’ health has taken on a crucial importance. International tourism, occupational travel and migratory fluxes have all contributed to this phenomenon which has drawn the attention of international organizations and national authorities on the risks associated with the spread of infectious diseases. The increasing concerns over emerging and re-emerging diseases has raised the global profile of travel medicine, urging the setting of quality standards in clinical practice and service delivery to travellers. The present study aimed to obtain a broad consensus on quality assessment criteria for pre-travel advice among practitioners in Portugal and Brazil based upon the Delphi method, using international criteria and standards and scientific studies as benchmarks. Our proposed model which integrates the consensual criteria obtained in our study, identified differences in quality criteria between the two expert groups. Nevertheless, they did highlight the importance attributed to qualified human resources, the quality of information for travelers and health professionals, and timely diagnosis, amongst others. The cases of Portugal and Brazil discussed here, underscore the need for more studies on the quality of pre- and post-travel consultations at national and transnational level. Com o crescimento exponencial de viagens ao nível global durante as últimas décadas, a saúde do viajante tornou-se uma questão premente. O turismo internacional, as deslocações profissionais e os fluxos migratórios contribuíram para este fenómeno, que centrou as atenções de organizações internacionais e autoridades nacionais nos riscos associados à propagação de doenças infeciosas. As preocupações crescentes acerca da transmissão de doenças emergentes e reemergentes, conferiu uma visibilidade global à medicina do viajante e impõem a definição de padrões de qualidade na atenção à saúde deste grupo de indivíduos O presente estudo visou obter um consenso alargado sobre os critérios de avaliação de qualidade para o aconselhamento de pré-viagem entre médicos em Portugal e Brasil baseado no método Delphi, utilizando critérios internacionais e estudos científicos como referência. Integrando os critérios consensuais obtidos no estudo, o nosso modelo identifica diferenças nos critérios de qualidade entre os dois grupos de peritos. Contudo, estes destacaram a importância dada a recursos humanos qualificados, a qualidade de informação para viajantes e profissionais de saúde, procedimentos estandardizados e ao diagnóstico em tempo útil. Os casos de Portugal e Brasil demonstram a importância de realizar mais estudos sobre a qualidade de consultas pré- e pós-viagem ao nível nacional e transnacional. Universidade Nova de Lisboa2021-03-31T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369oai:ojs.anaisihmt.com:article/369Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; Vol 20 (2021): Saúde digital e desenvolvimento internacional: avanços e desafios; 16-25Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; v. 20 (2021): Saúde digital e desenvolvimento internacional: avanços e desafios; 16-252184-23100303-7762reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://anaisihmt.com/index.php/ihmt/article/view/369https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369http://anaisihmt.com/index.php/ihmt/article/view/369/306http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWakimoto, Mayumi DuarteHavik, Philip J.Hartz, Zulmira M. A.Teodósio, Rosa2022-09-23T15:30:29Zoai:ojs.anaisihmt.com:article/369Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:04:03.391661Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus Critérios de qualidade nas consultas pré-viagem: um consenso Delphi |
title |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
spellingShingle |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus Wakimoto, Mayumi Duarte |
title_short |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
title_full |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
title_fullStr |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
title_sort |
Pre-travel consultations quality criteria: a Delphi consensus |
author |
Wakimoto, Mayumi Duarte |
author_facet |
Wakimoto, Mayumi Duarte Havik, Philip J. Hartz, Zulmira M. A. Teodósio, Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Havik, Philip J. Hartz, Zulmira M. A. Teodósio, Rosa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wakimoto, Mayumi Duarte Havik, Philip J. Hartz, Zulmira M. A. Teodósio, Rosa |
description |
With the exponential growth of international travel over the last decades, the question of travellers’ health has taken on a crucial importance. International tourism, occupational travel and migratory fluxes have all contributed to this phenomenon which has drawn the attention of international organizations and national authorities on the risks associated with the spread of infectious diseases. The increasing concerns over emerging and re-emerging diseases has raised the global profile of travel medicine, urging the setting of quality standards in clinical practice and service delivery to travellers. The present study aimed to obtain a broad consensus on quality assessment criteria for pre-travel advice among practitioners in Portugal and Brazil based upon the Delphi method, using international criteria and standards and scientific studies as benchmarks. Our proposed model which integrates the consensual criteria obtained in our study, identified differences in quality criteria between the two expert groups. Nevertheless, they did highlight the importance attributed to qualified human resources, the quality of information for travelers and health professionals, and timely diagnosis, amongst others. The cases of Portugal and Brazil discussed here, underscore the need for more studies on the quality of pre- and post-travel consultations at national and transnational level. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-31T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369 oai:ojs.anaisihmt.com:article/369 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.anaisihmt.com:article/369 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://anaisihmt.com/index.php/ihmt/article/view/369 https://doi.org/10.25761/anaisihmt.369 http://anaisihmt.com/index.php/ihmt/article/view/369/306 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; Vol 20 (2021): Saúde digital e desenvolvimento internacional: avanços e desafios; 16-25 Anais do Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; v. 20 (2021): Saúde digital e desenvolvimento internacional: avanços e desafios; 16-25 2184-2310 0303-7762 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817550839731978240 |