Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air®
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832 https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12062 |
Resumo: | Background: MASK‐air® is an app that supports allergic rhinitis patients in disease control. Users register daily allergy symptoms and their impact on activities using visual analog scales (VASs). We aimed to assess the concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these daily VASs. Methods: Daily monitoring VAS data were assessed in MASK‐air® users with allergic rhinitis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating daily VAS values with those of the EuroQol‐5 Dimensions (EQ‐5D) VAS, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) score, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Allergic Specific (WPAI‐AS) Questionnaire (work and activity impairment scores). Intra‐rater reliability was assessed in users providing multiple daily VASs within the same day. Test–retest reliability was tested in clinically stable users, as defined by the EQ‐5D VAS, CARAT, or “VAS Work” (i.e., VAS assessing the impact of allergy on work). Responsiveness was determined in users with two consecutive measurements of EQ‐5D‐VAS or “VAS Work” indicating clinical change. Results: A total of 17,780 MASK‐air® users, with 317,176 VAS days, were assessed. Concurrent validity was moderate–high (Spearman correlation coefficient range: 0.437–0.716). Intra‐rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged between 0.870 (VAS assessing global allergy symptoms) and 0.937 (VAS assessing allergy symptoms on sleep). Test–retest reliability ICCs ranged between 0.604 and 0.878—“VAS Work” and “VAS asthma” presented the highest ICCs. Moderate/large responsiveness effect sizes were observed—the sleep VAS was associated with lower responsiveness, while the global allergy symptoms VAS demonstrated higher responsiveness. Conclusion: In MASK‐air®, daily monitoring VASs have high intra‐rater reliability and moderate–high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads. |
id |
RCAP_e1b7af885dc0376f545ce447041dd937 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103832 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air®allergic rhinitismobile healthreliabilityresponsivenessvisual analog scalesBackground: MASK‐air® is an app that supports allergic rhinitis patients in disease control. Users register daily allergy symptoms and their impact on activities using visual analog scales (VASs). We aimed to assess the concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these daily VASs. Methods: Daily monitoring VAS data were assessed in MASK‐air® users with allergic rhinitis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating daily VAS values with those of the EuroQol‐5 Dimensions (EQ‐5D) VAS, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) score, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Allergic Specific (WPAI‐AS) Questionnaire (work and activity impairment scores). Intra‐rater reliability was assessed in users providing multiple daily VASs within the same day. Test–retest reliability was tested in clinically stable users, as defined by the EQ‐5D VAS, CARAT, or “VAS Work” (i.e., VAS assessing the impact of allergy on work). Responsiveness was determined in users with two consecutive measurements of EQ‐5D‐VAS or “VAS Work” indicating clinical change. Results: A total of 17,780 MASK‐air® users, with 317,176 VAS days, were assessed. Concurrent validity was moderate–high (Spearman correlation coefficient range: 0.437–0.716). Intra‐rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged between 0.870 (VAS assessing global allergy symptoms) and 0.937 (VAS assessing allergy symptoms on sleep). Test–retest reliability ICCs ranged between 0.604 and 0.878—“VAS Work” and “VAS asthma” presented the highest ICCs. Moderate/large responsiveness effect sizes were observed—the sleep VAS was associated with lower responsiveness, while the global allergy symptoms VAS demonstrated higher responsiveness. Conclusion: In MASK‐air®, daily monitoring VASs have high intra‐rater reliability and moderate–high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads.Wiley-Blackwell2021-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12062eng2045-7022Sousa-Pinto, BernardoEklund, PatrikPfaar, OliverKlimek, LudgerZuberbier, TorstenCzarlewski, WienczyslawaBédard, AnnabelleBindslev-Jensen, CarstenBedbrook, AnnaBosnic-Anticevich, SinthiaBrussino, LuisaCardona, VictoriaCruz, Alvaro Ade Vries, GovertDevillier, PhilippeFokkens, Wytske JFuentes-Pérez, José MiguelGemicioğlu, BilunHaahtela, TariHuerta-Villalobos, Yunen RocíoIvancevich, Juan CarlosKull, IngerKuna, PiotrKvedariene, VioletaLarenas Linnemann, Désirée ELaune, DanielMakris, MichaelMelén, ErikMorais-Almeida, MárioMösges, RalphMullol, JoaquimO'Hehir, Robyn EPapadopoulos, Nikolaos GPereira, Ana MargaridaProkopakis, Emmanuel PPsarros, FotisRegateiro, Frederico S.Reitsma, SietzeSamolinski, BoleslawScichilone, Nicolada Silva, JaneStellato, CristianaTodo-Bom, AnaTomazic, Peter ValentinSalmi, Sanna ToppilaValero, AntonioValiulis, ArunasValovirta, Erkkavan Eerd, MichielVentura, Maria TeresaYorgancioglu, ArzuBasagaña, XavierAntó, Josep MBousquet, JeanFonseca, João Almeidainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-11-30T21:38:36Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103832Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:36.231128Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
title |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
spellingShingle |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo allergic rhinitis mobile health reliability responsiveness visual analog scales |
title_short |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
title_full |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
title_fullStr |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
title_sort |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air® |
author |
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo |
author_facet |
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Eklund, Patrik Pfaar, Oliver Klimek, Ludger Zuberbier, Torsten Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa Bédard, Annabelle Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten Bedbrook, Anna Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia Brussino, Luisa Cardona, Victoria Cruz, Alvaro A de Vries, Govert Devillier, Philippe Fokkens, Wytske J Fuentes-Pérez, José Miguel Gemicioğlu, Bilun Haahtela, Tari Huerta-Villalobos, Yunen Rocío Ivancevich, Juan Carlos Kull, Inger Kuna, Piotr Kvedariene, Violeta Larenas Linnemann, Désirée E Laune, Daniel Makris, Michael Melén, Erik Morais-Almeida, Mário Mösges, Ralph Mullol, Joaquim O'Hehir, Robyn E Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G Pereira, Ana Margarida Prokopakis, Emmanuel P Psarros, Fotis Regateiro, Frederico S. Reitsma, Sietze Samolinski, Boleslaw Scichilone, Nicola da Silva, Jane Stellato, Cristiana Todo-Bom, Ana Tomazic, Peter Valentin Salmi, Sanna Toppila Valero, Antonio Valiulis, Arunas Valovirta, Erkka van Eerd, Michiel Ventura, Maria Teresa Yorgancioglu, Arzu Basagaña, Xavier Antó, Josep M Bousquet, Jean Fonseca, João Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Eklund, Patrik Pfaar, Oliver Klimek, Ludger Zuberbier, Torsten Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa Bédard, Annabelle Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten Bedbrook, Anna Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia Brussino, Luisa Cardona, Victoria Cruz, Alvaro A de Vries, Govert Devillier, Philippe Fokkens, Wytske J Fuentes-Pérez, José Miguel Gemicioğlu, Bilun Haahtela, Tari Huerta-Villalobos, Yunen Rocío Ivancevich, Juan Carlos Kull, Inger Kuna, Piotr Kvedariene, Violeta Larenas Linnemann, Désirée E Laune, Daniel Makris, Michael Melén, Erik Morais-Almeida, Mário Mösges, Ralph Mullol, Joaquim O'Hehir, Robyn E Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G Pereira, Ana Margarida Prokopakis, Emmanuel P Psarros, Fotis Regateiro, Frederico S. Reitsma, Sietze Samolinski, Boleslaw Scichilone, Nicola da Silva, Jane Stellato, Cristiana Todo-Bom, Ana Tomazic, Peter Valentin Salmi, Sanna Toppila Valero, Antonio Valiulis, Arunas Valovirta, Erkka van Eerd, Michiel Ventura, Maria Teresa Yorgancioglu, Arzu Basagaña, Xavier Antó, Josep M Bousquet, Jean Fonseca, João Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Eklund, Patrik Pfaar, Oliver Klimek, Ludger Zuberbier, Torsten Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa Bédard, Annabelle Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten Bedbrook, Anna Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia Brussino, Luisa Cardona, Victoria Cruz, Alvaro A de Vries, Govert Devillier, Philippe Fokkens, Wytske J Fuentes-Pérez, José Miguel Gemicioğlu, Bilun Haahtela, Tari Huerta-Villalobos, Yunen Rocío Ivancevich, Juan Carlos Kull, Inger Kuna, Piotr Kvedariene, Violeta Larenas Linnemann, Désirée E Laune, Daniel Makris, Michael Melén, Erik Morais-Almeida, Mário Mösges, Ralph Mullol, Joaquim O'Hehir, Robyn E Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G Pereira, Ana Margarida Prokopakis, Emmanuel P Psarros, Fotis Regateiro, Frederico S. Reitsma, Sietze Samolinski, Boleslaw Scichilone, Nicola da Silva, Jane Stellato, Cristiana Todo-Bom, Ana Tomazic, Peter Valentin Salmi, Sanna Toppila Valero, Antonio Valiulis, Arunas Valovirta, Erkka van Eerd, Michiel Ventura, Maria Teresa Yorgancioglu, Arzu Basagaña, Xavier Antó, Josep M Bousquet, Jean Fonseca, João Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
allergic rhinitis mobile health reliability responsiveness visual analog scales |
topic |
allergic rhinitis mobile health reliability responsiveness visual analog scales |
description |
Background: MASK‐air® is an app that supports allergic rhinitis patients in disease control. Users register daily allergy symptoms and their impact on activities using visual analog scales (VASs). We aimed to assess the concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these daily VASs. Methods: Daily monitoring VAS data were assessed in MASK‐air® users with allergic rhinitis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating daily VAS values with those of the EuroQol‐5 Dimensions (EQ‐5D) VAS, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) score, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Allergic Specific (WPAI‐AS) Questionnaire (work and activity impairment scores). Intra‐rater reliability was assessed in users providing multiple daily VASs within the same day. Test–retest reliability was tested in clinically stable users, as defined by the EQ‐5D VAS, CARAT, or “VAS Work” (i.e., VAS assessing the impact of allergy on work). Responsiveness was determined in users with two consecutive measurements of EQ‐5D‐VAS or “VAS Work” indicating clinical change. Results: A total of 17,780 MASK‐air® users, with 317,176 VAS days, were assessed. Concurrent validity was moderate–high (Spearman correlation coefficient range: 0.437–0.716). Intra‐rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged between 0.870 (VAS assessing global allergy symptoms) and 0.937 (VAS assessing allergy symptoms on sleep). Test–retest reliability ICCs ranged between 0.604 and 0.878—“VAS Work” and “VAS asthma” presented the highest ICCs. Moderate/large responsiveness effect sizes were observed—the sleep VAS was associated with lower responsiveness, while the global allergy symptoms VAS demonstrated higher responsiveness. Conclusion: In MASK‐air®, daily monitoring VASs have high intra‐rater reliability and moderate–high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832 https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12062 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103832 https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12062 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2045-7022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134098379243520 |