Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves,Andreia Soares
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pestana-Santos,Márcia, McCourt,Christine, Prata,Ana Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Midwifery models of care are sustainable, cost-effective, safe, and effective models of care that have long been regarded as adequate and recommended for the care of women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The implementation of such models has, however, been very slow in countries where a medicalized culture towards pregnancy and birth prevails. Since there is no systematized evidence that examines the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwifery models of care. Objective: Identify and synthesize the literature on barriers and facilitators perceived by stakeholders to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model in a healthcare system. Methods: The review will consider qualitative, and mixed methods studies. For the mix-methods studies only the qualitative component will be included in the review. No date limits will be applied. Studies written in English, Spanish and Portuguese will be included. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science (EBSCO). Sources of grey literature include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and relevant organizational websites. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. The synthesized findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in findings. Discussion: We anticipate that our systematic review will provide guidance for the implementation of midwifery-led care models in any healthcare setting. Conclusion: This protocol sets out the planning and documents the methodology the researchers will employ in this systematic review.
id RCAP_e1d48c5de1166197ded20331a225a9c1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0873-30152023000300201
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocolmidwiferymodels of carepregnancyimplementationnursingAbstract Introduction: Midwifery models of care are sustainable, cost-effective, safe, and effective models of care that have long been regarded as adequate and recommended for the care of women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The implementation of such models has, however, been very slow in countries where a medicalized culture towards pregnancy and birth prevails. Since there is no systematized evidence that examines the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwifery models of care. Objective: Identify and synthesize the literature on barriers and facilitators perceived by stakeholders to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model in a healthcare system. Methods: The review will consider qualitative, and mixed methods studies. For the mix-methods studies only the qualitative component will be included in the review. No date limits will be applied. Studies written in English, Spanish and Portuguese will be included. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science (EBSCO). Sources of grey literature include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and relevant organizational websites. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. The synthesized findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in findings. Discussion: We anticipate that our systematic review will provide guidance for the implementation of midwifery-led care models in any healthcare setting. Conclusion: This protocol sets out the planning and documents the methodology the researchers will employ in this systematic review.Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)2023-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health n.22 2023reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201Gonçalves,Andreia SoaresPestana-Santos,MárciaMcCourt,ChristinePrata,Ana Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:10:23Zoai:scielo:S0873-30152023000300201Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:21:56.940379Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
title Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
spellingShingle Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Gonçalves,Andreia Soares
midwifery
models of care
pregnancy
implementation
nursing
title_short Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
title_full Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
title_sort Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model: a qualitative systematic review protocol
author Gonçalves,Andreia Soares
author_facet Gonçalves,Andreia Soares
Pestana-Santos,Márcia
McCourt,Christine
Prata,Ana Paula
author_role author
author2 Pestana-Santos,Márcia
McCourt,Christine
Prata,Ana Paula
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves,Andreia Soares
Pestana-Santos,Márcia
McCourt,Christine
Prata,Ana Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv midwifery
models of care
pregnancy
implementation
nursing
topic midwifery
models of care
pregnancy
implementation
nursing
description Abstract Introduction: Midwifery models of care are sustainable, cost-effective, safe, and effective models of care that have long been regarded as adequate and recommended for the care of women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The implementation of such models has, however, been very slow in countries where a medicalized culture towards pregnancy and birth prevails. Since there is no systematized evidence that examines the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwifery models of care. Objective: Identify and synthesize the literature on barriers and facilitators perceived by stakeholders to the implementation of a midwifery-led-care model in a healthcare system. Methods: The review will consider qualitative, and mixed methods studies. For the mix-methods studies only the qualitative component will be included in the review. No date limits will be applied. Studies written in English, Spanish and Portuguese will be included. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science (EBSCO). Sources of grey literature include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and relevant organizational websites. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. The synthesized findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in findings. Discussion: We anticipate that our systematic review will provide guidance for the implementation of midwifery-led care models in any healthcare setting. Conclusion: This protocol sets out the planning and documents the methodology the researchers will employ in this systematic review.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health n.22 2023
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137304212668416