Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mende, Janne
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Müller, Thomas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417
Resumo: In IR and beyond, there is considerable debate about the ways global governance, the transnationalisation of publics, and changes in communication technologies have affected the interplay between publics and global politics. This debate is characterised by disagreements about how to conceptualise publics in the global realm—and whether or not they exist in the first place. We seek to contribute to this debate by disentangling the various meanings associated with publics in order to get a better grasp of how publics shape and are shaped by global politics. We do so in two steps. First, we distinguish four different manifestations of publics: audiences, spheres, institutions, and public interests. Second, we identify four key dynamics that affect the evolution and interplay of these manifestations in global politics: the distinction between public and private, changes in communications technologies, the politics of transparency, and the need to legitimise global governance. These interrelated dynamics reshape the publicness of global politics while sustaining the plurality of the publics that partake in it.
id RCAP_e2714afb241c6cd49258d2028de5648d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7417
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Papercommon goods; communication technologies; global governance; global politics; institutions; public‐private divide; publics; transparencyIn IR and beyond, there is considerable debate about the ways global governance, the transnationalisation of publics, and changes in communication technologies have affected the interplay between publics and global politics. This debate is characterised by disagreements about how to conceptualise publics in the global realm—and whether or not they exist in the first place. We seek to contribute to this debate by disentangling the various meanings associated with publics in order to get a better grasp of how publics shape and are shaped by global politics. We do so in two steps. First, we distinguish four different manifestations of publics: audiences, spheres, institutions, and public interests. Second, we identify four key dynamics that affect the evolution and interplay of these manifestations in global politics: the distinction between public and private, changes in communications technologies, the politics of transparency, and the need to legitimise global governance. These interrelated dynamics reshape the publicness of global politics while sustaining the plurality of the publics that partake in it.Cogitatio Press2023-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): Publics in Global Politics; 91-972183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7417https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7417/7417Copyright (c) 2023 Janne Mende, Thomas Müllerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMende, JanneMüller, Thomas2023-08-31T15:15:23Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7417Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:27:55.624131Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
title Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
spellingShingle Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
Mende, Janne
common goods; communication technologies; global governance; global politics; institutions; public‐private divide; publics; transparency
title_short Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
title_full Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
title_fullStr Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
title_full_unstemmed Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
title_sort Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper
author Mende, Janne
author_facet Mende, Janne
Müller, Thomas
author_role author
author2 Müller, Thomas
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mende, Janne
Müller, Thomas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv common goods; communication technologies; global governance; global politics; institutions; public‐private divide; publics; transparency
topic common goods; communication technologies; global governance; global politics; institutions; public‐private divide; publics; transparency
description In IR and beyond, there is considerable debate about the ways global governance, the transnationalisation of publics, and changes in communication technologies have affected the interplay between publics and global politics. This debate is characterised by disagreements about how to conceptualise publics in the global realm—and whether or not they exist in the first place. We seek to contribute to this debate by disentangling the various meanings associated with publics in order to get a better grasp of how publics shape and are shaped by global politics. We do so in two steps. First, we distinguish four different manifestations of publics: audiences, spheres, institutions, and public interests. Second, we identify four key dynamics that affect the evolution and interplay of these manifestations in global politics: the distinction between public and private, changes in communications technologies, the politics of transparency, and the need to legitimise global governance. These interrelated dynamics reshape the publicness of global politics while sustaining the plurality of the publics that partake in it.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.7417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7417
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7417/7417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Janne Mende, Thomas Müller
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Janne Mende, Thomas Müller
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): Publics in Global Politics; 91-97
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133547293835264