Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119364
Resumo: To be "sustainable" is not a post-modern attitude. Architecture relies, more than ever, in the relearning of the Modern Era critical spirit and the revisiting of the past, to proof that an architectural work does not depend on a key concept. Instead, it depends on "being born", paraphrasing Távora, "from the people and from the land", in accordance with conditioning factors established by the surroundings. In the 60s, a new posture, linking conscience and responsability, was born to assure the return of dwelling quality, the respect for nature and the central position of Men, promoting the focus on the features of places, for a "present" architecture free of a negative impact on the future. "Sustainability" was presented as a rescue against the International Modern Architecture, known for its destruction habilities towards all forms of architeture based on identity, on the place, on the people and the sensitivity regarding Regional Architecture, born of the symbiosis between necessity and rationalism. It seemed a rational stance, were it not for the possibility of modern architecture to prove that such features can be felt in a touching variety of languages and interventions left to posterity by the revered masters of the 20th century architects, and that "sustainability" concerns as always proven to exist in the works of Architects both in the World, such as Le Corbusier, Frank Lloyd Wright, Mies van der Rohe, Alvar Aalto, and in Portugal, Raul Lino, Fernando Távora, Alfredo Viana de Lima or Álvaro Siza Vieira. In opposition to the internacional post-war movement and the reflexion (achieved at the epicenter of modernism - CIAM - as in Portugal, specially from the I Congress of Nacional Architecture, in 48) that architecture must hear the echoes of the "Heart of the City" and learn from the historical past and the history of places, in appreciation of the conection between erudition and popular knowledge. Through a renewed look at the steps taken in the architecture of the first International and Portuguese modernity of the 20th century, we intend to prove the timelessness of the so-called "sustainable" arguments.
id RCAP_e28855c6fbc6859bf81740a92d32659f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/119364
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Olhar o passado em defesa do futuroArtesArtsTo be "sustainable" is not a post-modern attitude. Architecture relies, more than ever, in the relearning of the Modern Era critical spirit and the revisiting of the past, to proof that an architectural work does not depend on a key concept. Instead, it depends on "being born", paraphrasing Távora, "from the people and from the land", in accordance with conditioning factors established by the surroundings. In the 60s, a new posture, linking conscience and responsability, was born to assure the return of dwelling quality, the respect for nature and the central position of Men, promoting the focus on the features of places, for a "present" architecture free of a negative impact on the future. "Sustainability" was presented as a rescue against the International Modern Architecture, known for its destruction habilities towards all forms of architeture based on identity, on the place, on the people and the sensitivity regarding Regional Architecture, born of the symbiosis between necessity and rationalism. It seemed a rational stance, were it not for the possibility of modern architecture to prove that such features can be felt in a touching variety of languages and interventions left to posterity by the revered masters of the 20th century architects, and that "sustainability" concerns as always proven to exist in the works of Architects both in the World, such as Le Corbusier, Frank Lloyd Wright, Mies van der Rohe, Alvar Aalto, and in Portugal, Raul Lino, Fernando Távora, Alfredo Viana de Lima or Álvaro Siza Vieira. In opposition to the internacional post-war movement and the reflexion (achieved at the epicenter of modernism - CIAM - as in Portugal, specially from the I Congress of Nacional Architecture, in 48) that architecture must hear the echoes of the "Heart of the City" and learn from the historical past and the history of places, in appreciation of the conection between erudition and popular knowledge. Through a renewed look at the steps taken in the architecture of the first International and Portuguese modernity of the 20th century, we intend to prove the timelessness of the so-called "sustainable" arguments.2018-11-062018-11-06T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/119364TID:202376419porBruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T12:42:15Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/119364Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:25:06.355544Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
title Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
spellingShingle Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
Bruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunes
Artes
Arts
title_short Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
title_full Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
title_fullStr Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
title_full_unstemmed Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
title_sort Olhar o passado em defesa do futuro
author Bruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunes
author_facet Bruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruna Filipa Ribeiro Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artes
Arts
topic Artes
Arts
description To be "sustainable" is not a post-modern attitude. Architecture relies, more than ever, in the relearning of the Modern Era critical spirit and the revisiting of the past, to proof that an architectural work does not depend on a key concept. Instead, it depends on "being born", paraphrasing Távora, "from the people and from the land", in accordance with conditioning factors established by the surroundings. In the 60s, a new posture, linking conscience and responsability, was born to assure the return of dwelling quality, the respect for nature and the central position of Men, promoting the focus on the features of places, for a "present" architecture free of a negative impact on the future. "Sustainability" was presented as a rescue against the International Modern Architecture, known for its destruction habilities towards all forms of architeture based on identity, on the place, on the people and the sensitivity regarding Regional Architecture, born of the symbiosis between necessity and rationalism. It seemed a rational stance, were it not for the possibility of modern architecture to prove that such features can be felt in a touching variety of languages and interventions left to posterity by the revered masters of the 20th century architects, and that "sustainability" concerns as always proven to exist in the works of Architects both in the World, such as Le Corbusier, Frank Lloyd Wright, Mies van der Rohe, Alvar Aalto, and in Portugal, Raul Lino, Fernando Távora, Alfredo Viana de Lima or Álvaro Siza Vieira. In opposition to the internacional post-war movement and the reflexion (achieved at the epicenter of modernism - CIAM - as in Portugal, specially from the I Congress of Nacional Architecture, in 48) that architecture must hear the echoes of the "Heart of the City" and learn from the historical past and the history of places, in appreciation of the conection between erudition and popular knowledge. Through a renewed look at the steps taken in the architecture of the first International and Portuguese modernity of the 20th century, we intend to prove the timelessness of the so-called "sustainable" arguments.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-06
2018-11-06T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119364
TID:202376419
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119364
identifier_str_mv TID:202376419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135555969089536