Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267 |
Resumo: | This article analyses European Union (EU) negotiations on the European Climate Law and the 2030 Climate Target Plan in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic. Adopting Ansell and Trondal’s (2018) conceptualisation of turbulence, it argues that the pandemic intensified the environmental turbulence within which European policy makers had been operating following Brexit, the rule of law dispute with Poland and Hungary, and the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Organisational turbulence within EU institutions also affected the negotiations, particularly due to the reliance of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on the political support of East-Central European governments that are sceptical of ambitious climate action. Moreover, the Commission, the European Council and the Parliament have taken different positions on the 2030 climate target and on the governance to pursue subsequent targets. Turbulence of scale—reflecting the nature of the EU as a multi-level actor—became relevant too, as the EU found it difficult to agree on its 2030 climate target due to disputes between member states and European institutions. European decision makers responded to turbulence through major policy initiatives, such as the EU Recovery Plan, the Green Deal agenda, and making funds conditional to the respect of the rule of law. They also pursued intra-EU compromises that accommodated different positions—for instance, on the Climate Law. Nonetheless, turbulence continues to pose a formidable challenge to the progress of the EU’s climate agenda. |
id |
RCAP_e2cc95cf1e378729544ddbf40215b8e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4267 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets2030 climate and energy framework; climate; European Climate Law; European Green Deal; European Union; turbulenceThis article analyses European Union (EU) negotiations on the European Climate Law and the 2030 Climate Target Plan in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic. Adopting Ansell and Trondal’s (2018) conceptualisation of turbulence, it argues that the pandemic intensified the environmental turbulence within which European policy makers had been operating following Brexit, the rule of law dispute with Poland and Hungary, and the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Organisational turbulence within EU institutions also affected the negotiations, particularly due to the reliance of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on the political support of East-Central European governments that are sceptical of ambitious climate action. Moreover, the Commission, the European Council and the Parliament have taken different positions on the 2030 climate target and on the governance to pursue subsequent targets. Turbulence of scale—reflecting the nature of the EU as a multi-level actor—became relevant too, as the EU found it difficult to agree on its 2030 climate target due to disputes between member states and European institutions. European decision makers responded to turbulence through major policy initiatives, such as the EU Recovery Plan, the Green Deal agenda, and making funds conditional to the respect of the rule of law. They also pursued intra-EU compromises that accommodated different positions—for instance, on the Climate Law. Nonetheless, turbulence continues to pose a formidable challenge to the progress of the EU’s climate agenda.Cogitatio2021-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4267Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 3 (2021): Climate Governance and the European Green Deal in Turbulent Times; 327-3362183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4267https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4267/4267Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Siddihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSiddi, Marco2022-12-22T15:16:57Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4267Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:33.096710Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
title |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
spellingShingle |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets Siddi, Marco 2030 climate and energy framework; climate; European Climate Law; European Green Deal; European Union; turbulence |
title_short |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
title_full |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
title_fullStr |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
title_sort |
Coping With Turbulence: EU Negotiations on the 2030 and 2050 Climate Targets |
author |
Siddi, Marco |
author_facet |
Siddi, Marco |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siddi, Marco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
2030 climate and energy framework; climate; European Climate Law; European Green Deal; European Union; turbulence |
topic |
2030 climate and energy framework; climate; European Climate Law; European Green Deal; European Union; turbulence |
description |
This article analyses European Union (EU) negotiations on the European Climate Law and the 2030 Climate Target Plan in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic. Adopting Ansell and Trondal’s (2018) conceptualisation of turbulence, it argues that the pandemic intensified the environmental turbulence within which European policy makers had been operating following Brexit, the rule of law dispute with Poland and Hungary, and the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Organisational turbulence within EU institutions also affected the negotiations, particularly due to the reliance of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on the political support of East-Central European governments that are sceptical of ambitious climate action. Moreover, the Commission, the European Council and the Parliament have taken different positions on the 2030 climate target and on the governance to pursue subsequent targets. Turbulence of scale—reflecting the nature of the EU as a multi-level actor—became relevant too, as the EU found it difficult to agree on its 2030 climate target due to disputes between member states and European institutions. European decision makers responded to turbulence through major policy initiatives, such as the EU Recovery Plan, the Green Deal agenda, and making funds conditional to the respect of the rule of law. They also pursued intra-EU compromises that accommodated different positions—for instance, on the Climate Law. Nonetheless, turbulence continues to pose a formidable challenge to the progress of the EU’s climate agenda. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4267 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4267 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4267 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4267 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4267/4267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Siddi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Siddi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 3 (2021): Climate Governance and the European Green Deal in Turbulent Times; 327-336 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130671134801920 |