Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204 |
Resumo: | Hydatidosis, also known as hydatid cyst, is caused by the larval stages of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus. Its diagnostic relies mainly on clinical findings, epidemiology, and imaging techniques supported by serological tests. Surgery is the commonest treatment; it is important to have a definitive diagnosis of hydatidosis before surgery, to avoid the spread of the cysts during the procedure. In this study, two immunoserologic tests for the diagnostic of hydatidosis are compared: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G; and Fluoro-Enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA) for immunoglobulin E. Of the 55 patients included in this study are in a pre-surgery stage, 31% have a calcified hydatic cyst, 54,5% a not calcified cyst and 14.5% have no hydatic cyst. Both tests had the same specificity (87.5%), and the sensitivity of the ELISA IgG was lower (63.8%) than the FEIA IgE (76.6%). The correlation observed between both tests was good (r = 0.726, p < 0.05). |
id |
RCAP_e2f6f4205be407e21edd2a3f4c862a3a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.ipl.pt:article/753 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosisAvaliação de dois métodos laboratoriais para diagnóstico de hidatidoseEchinococcus granulosusHidatidoseELISAFEIAEchinococcus granulosusHydatidosisELISAFEIAHydatidosis, also known as hydatid cyst, is caused by the larval stages of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus. Its diagnostic relies mainly on clinical findings, epidemiology, and imaging techniques supported by serological tests. Surgery is the commonest treatment; it is important to have a definitive diagnosis of hydatidosis before surgery, to avoid the spread of the cysts during the procedure. In this study, two immunoserologic tests for the diagnostic of hydatidosis are compared: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G; and Fluoro-Enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA) for immunoglobulin E. Of the 55 patients included in this study are in a pre-surgery stage, 31% have a calcified hydatic cyst, 54,5% a not calcified cyst and 14.5% have no hydatic cyst. Both tests had the same specificity (87.5%), and the sensitivity of the ELISA IgG was lower (63.8%) than the FEIA IgE (76.6%). The correlation observed between both tests was good (r = 0.726, p < 0.05).A hidatidose, vulgarmente conhecida por quisto hidático, é causada pelos estados larvares do parasita Echinococcus granulosus. O seu diagnóstico baseia-se na clínica, na epidemiologia e nas técnicas imagiológicas, sendo suportado por testes serológicos. O tratamento mais comum é o cirúrgico, sendo importante o diagnóstico definitivo da doença antes da cirurgia, para se prevenir a disseminação dos quistos que pode ocorrer durante a mesma. Neste trabalho comparam-se dois métodos imunoserológicos para odiagnóstico da hidatidose: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) para pesquisa de Imunoglobulina G; e Fluoro-enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA) para pesquisa de Imunoglobulina E. Dos 55 indivíduos incluídos no estudo, todos em fase pré-operatória, 31% possuíam quisto hidático calcificado, 54,5% quisto hidático não calcificado e 14,5% não possuíam hidatidose, mas quistos simples. Os testes apresentaram a mesma especificidade (87,5%), sendo a sensibilidade do ELISA IgG mais baixa (63,8%) do que a do FEIA IgE (76,6%). Foi demonstrada uma boa correlação entre os dois métodos (r = 0,726, p < 0,05). Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa)2009-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25758/set.204https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204Saúde e Tecnologia; No. 03 (2009): Maio 2009; 15-18Saúde & Tecnologia; N.º 03 (2009): Maio 2009; 15-181646-9704reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/753https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/753/642Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Saúde & Tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatista, GenerosaMagalhães, ZúzecaAbreu, RenatoCaria, ElisaAlmeida, Ana2023-05-12T08:30:24Zoai:journals.ipl.pt:article/753Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:45.846067Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis Avaliação de dois métodos laboratoriais para diagnóstico de hidatidose |
title |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis Batista, Generosa Echinococcus granulosus Hidatidose ELISA FEIA Echinococcus granulosus Hydatidosis ELISA FEIA |
title_short |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
title_full |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
title_sort |
Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis |
author |
Batista, Generosa |
author_facet |
Batista, Generosa Magalhães, Zúzeca Abreu, Renato Caria, Elisa Almeida, Ana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magalhães, Zúzeca Abreu, Renato Caria, Elisa Almeida, Ana |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Batista, Generosa Magalhães, Zúzeca Abreu, Renato Caria, Elisa Almeida, Ana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Echinococcus granulosus Hidatidose ELISA FEIA Echinococcus granulosus Hydatidosis ELISA FEIA |
topic |
Echinococcus granulosus Hidatidose ELISA FEIA Echinococcus granulosus Hydatidosis ELISA FEIA |
description |
Hydatidosis, also known as hydatid cyst, is caused by the larval stages of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus. Its diagnostic relies mainly on clinical findings, epidemiology, and imaging techniques supported by serological tests. Surgery is the commonest treatment; it is important to have a definitive diagnosis of hydatidosis before surgery, to avoid the spread of the cysts during the procedure. In this study, two immunoserologic tests for the diagnostic of hydatidosis are compared: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G; and Fluoro-Enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA) for immunoglobulin E. Of the 55 patients included in this study are in a pre-surgery stage, 31% have a calcified hydatic cyst, 54,5% a not calcified cyst and 14.5% have no hydatic cyst. Both tests had the same specificity (87.5%), and the sensitivity of the ELISA IgG was lower (63.8%) than the FEIA IgE (76.6%). The correlation observed between both tests was good (r = 0.726, p < 0.05). |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-05-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204 https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/753 https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/753/642 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Saúde & Tecnologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Saúde & Tecnologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde e Tecnologia; No. 03 (2009): Maio 2009; 15-18 Saúde & Tecnologia; N.º 03 (2009): Maio 2009; 15-18 1646-9704 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131513959219200 |