The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573 |
Resumo: | In the context of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the debate on whether climate change should be included and how has been ongoing since 2007. This article contributes to existing research on this problem by expounding a three-fold analysis. First, it assesses the conceptual approach to the climate-security nexus from the joint statement of 10 UNSC member states in 2020. Second, it critically exposes the confusion of different climate-security conceptions and uncovers shared assumptions of the UNSC-member states in 2020 by comparing their different positions, which makes a soon-to-come agreement likely. Third, it critically evaluates whether the proposal to include climate change into the UNSC will lead to a transformative change of the institution, of the meaning of security, and on how this would correspond to the existential threats outlined in the Anthropocene context. The theoretical framework of analysis draws on critical security studies. It takes as its empirical basis the primary sources of the UNSC debate of 2020 and is also informed by the secondary literature on climate and security and the Earth System Sciences descriptions of the state of the planet. |
id |
RCAP_e4c908a11b7e0839c44aaa12c2198ad1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4573 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, IgnoranceAnthropocene; climate change; climate-security nexus; existential threat; United Nations Security CouncilIn the context of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the debate on whether climate change should be included and how has been ongoing since 2007. This article contributes to existing research on this problem by expounding a three-fold analysis. First, it assesses the conceptual approach to the climate-security nexus from the joint statement of 10 UNSC member states in 2020. Second, it critically exposes the confusion of different climate-security conceptions and uncovers shared assumptions of the UNSC-member states in 2020 by comparing their different positions, which makes a soon-to-come agreement likely. Third, it critically evaluates whether the proposal to include climate change into the UNSC will lead to a transformative change of the institution, of the meaning of security, and on how this would correspond to the existential threats outlined in the Anthropocene context. The theoretical framework of analysis draws on critical security studies. It takes as its empirical basis the primary sources of the UNSC debate of 2020 and is also informed by the secondary literature on climate and security and the Earth System Sciences descriptions of the state of the planet.Cogitatio2021-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4573Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Climate Change and Security; 5-152183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4573https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4573/4573Copyright (c) 2021 Judith Nora Hardthttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHardt, Judith Nora2022-12-22T15:15:36Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4573Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:10.695485Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
title |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
spellingShingle |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance Hardt, Judith Nora Anthropocene; climate change; climate-security nexus; existential threat; United Nations Security Council |
title_short |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
title_full |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
title_fullStr |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
title_full_unstemmed |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
title_sort |
The United Nations Security Council at the Forefront of (Climate) Change? Confusion, Stalemate, Ignorance |
author |
Hardt, Judith Nora |
author_facet |
Hardt, Judith Nora |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hardt, Judith Nora |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anthropocene; climate change; climate-security nexus; existential threat; United Nations Security Council |
topic |
Anthropocene; climate change; climate-security nexus; existential threat; United Nations Security Council |
description |
In the context of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the debate on whether climate change should be included and how has been ongoing since 2007. This article contributes to existing research on this problem by expounding a three-fold analysis. First, it assesses the conceptual approach to the climate-security nexus from the joint statement of 10 UNSC member states in 2020. Second, it critically exposes the confusion of different climate-security conceptions and uncovers shared assumptions of the UNSC-member states in 2020 by comparing their different positions, which makes a soon-to-come agreement likely. Third, it critically evaluates whether the proposal to include climate change into the UNSC will lead to a transformative change of the institution, of the meaning of security, and on how this would correspond to the existential threats outlined in the Anthropocene context. The theoretical framework of analysis draws on critical security studies. It takes as its empirical basis the primary sources of the UNSC debate of 2020 and is also informed by the secondary literature on climate and security and the Earth System Sciences descriptions of the state of the planet. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-22 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4573 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4573 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4573 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4573/4573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Judith Nora Hardt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Judith Nora Hardt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Climate Change and Security; 5-15 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817552985191874560 |