Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3353 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement. |
id |
RCAP_e5adf8fc62c9f0e2515b8a71cb63d77d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3353 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two CohortsHDE ALERHSM PNEUAdolescentAdultAdministration, InhalationAsthma / drug therapyCohort StudiesFemaleMaleHumansMiddle AgedMedication Adherence / statistics & numerical dataYoung AdultPhysician-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesOBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.BMJ Publishing GroupRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEJácome, CPereira, AMAlmeida, RFerreira-Magalhaes, MCouto, MAraujo, LPereira, MAlves Correia, MChaves Loureiro, CCatarata, MJMaia Santos, LPereira, JRamos, BLopes, CMendes, ACidrais Rodrigues, JCOliveira, GAguiar, APAfonso, ICarvalho, JArrobas, ACoutinho Costa, JDias, JTodo Bom, AAzevedo, JRibeiro, CAlves, MLeiria Pinto, PNeuparth, NPalhinha, AGaspar Marques, JPinto, NMartins, PTodo Bom, FAlvarenga Santos, MGomes Costa, ASilva Neto, ASantalha, MLozoya, CSantos, NSilva, DVasconcelos, MJTaborda-Barata, LCarvalhal, CTeixeira, MFRodrigues Alves, RMoreira, ASSofia Pinto, CMorais Silva, PAlves, CCâmara, RCoelho, DBordalo, DFernandes, RFerreira, RMenezes, FGomes, RCalix, MJMarques, ACardoso, JEmiliano, MGerardo, RNunes, CCâmara, RFerreira, JACarvalho, AFreitas, PCorreia, RFonseca, J2019-11-12T15:26:15Z2019-11-072019-11-07T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3353engBMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e031732.10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031732info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:42:32Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3353Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:40.236507Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
title |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
spellingShingle |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts Jácome, C HDE ALER HSM PNEU Adolescent Adult Administration, Inhalation Asthma / drug therapy Cohort Studies Female Male Humans Middle Aged Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data Young Adult Physician-Patient Relations Prospective Studies |
title_short |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
title_full |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
title_fullStr |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
title_sort |
Patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Adherence to Inhaled Controller Medication: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Two Cohorts |
author |
Jácome, C |
author_facet |
Jácome, C Pereira, AM Almeida, R Ferreira-Magalhaes, M Couto, M Araujo, L Pereira, M Alves Correia, M Chaves Loureiro, C Catarata, MJ Maia Santos, L Pereira, J Ramos, B Lopes, C Mendes, A Cidrais Rodrigues, JC Oliveira, G Aguiar, AP Afonso, I Carvalho, J Arrobas, A Coutinho Costa, J Dias, J Todo Bom, A Azevedo, J Ribeiro, C Alves, M Leiria Pinto, P Neuparth, N Palhinha, A Gaspar Marques, J Pinto, N Martins, P Todo Bom, F Alvarenga Santos, M Gomes Costa, A Silva Neto, A Santalha, M Lozoya, C Santos, N Silva, D Vasconcelos, MJ Taborda-Barata, L Carvalhal, C Teixeira, MF Rodrigues Alves, R Moreira, AS Sofia Pinto, C Morais Silva, P Alves, C Câmara, R Coelho, D Bordalo, D Fernandes, R Ferreira, R Menezes, F Gomes, R Calix, MJ Marques, A Cardoso, J Emiliano, M Gerardo, R Nunes, C Ferreira, JA Carvalho, A Freitas, P Correia, R Fonseca, J |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, AM Almeida, R Ferreira-Magalhaes, M Couto, M Araujo, L Pereira, M Alves Correia, M Chaves Loureiro, C Catarata, MJ Maia Santos, L Pereira, J Ramos, B Lopes, C Mendes, A Cidrais Rodrigues, JC Oliveira, G Aguiar, AP Afonso, I Carvalho, J Arrobas, A Coutinho Costa, J Dias, J Todo Bom, A Azevedo, J Ribeiro, C Alves, M Leiria Pinto, P Neuparth, N Palhinha, A Gaspar Marques, J Pinto, N Martins, P Todo Bom, F Alvarenga Santos, M Gomes Costa, A Silva Neto, A Santalha, M Lozoya, C Santos, N Silva, D Vasconcelos, MJ Taborda-Barata, L Carvalhal, C Teixeira, MF Rodrigues Alves, R Moreira, AS Sofia Pinto, C Morais Silva, P Alves, C Câmara, R Coelho, D Bordalo, D Fernandes, R Ferreira, R Menezes, F Gomes, R Calix, MJ Marques, A Cardoso, J Emiliano, M Gerardo, R Nunes, C Ferreira, JA Carvalho, A Freitas, P Correia, R Fonseca, J |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jácome, C Pereira, AM Almeida, R Ferreira-Magalhaes, M Couto, M Araujo, L Pereira, M Alves Correia, M Chaves Loureiro, C Catarata, MJ Maia Santos, L Pereira, J Ramos, B Lopes, C Mendes, A Cidrais Rodrigues, JC Oliveira, G Aguiar, AP Afonso, I Carvalho, J Arrobas, A Coutinho Costa, J Dias, J Todo Bom, A Azevedo, J Ribeiro, C Alves, M Leiria Pinto, P Neuparth, N Palhinha, A Gaspar Marques, J Pinto, N Martins, P Todo Bom, F Alvarenga Santos, M Gomes Costa, A Silva Neto, A Santalha, M Lozoya, C Santos, N Silva, D Vasconcelos, MJ Taborda-Barata, L Carvalhal, C Teixeira, MF Rodrigues Alves, R Moreira, AS Sofia Pinto, C Morais Silva, P Alves, C Câmara, R Coelho, D Bordalo, D Fernandes, R Ferreira, R Menezes, F Gomes, R Calix, MJ Marques, A Cardoso, J Emiliano, M Gerardo, R Nunes, C Câmara, R Ferreira, JA Carvalho, A Freitas, P Correia, R Fonseca, J |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
HDE ALER HSM PNEU Adolescent Adult Administration, Inhalation Asthma / drug therapy Cohort Studies Female Male Humans Middle Aged Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data Young Adult Physician-Patient Relations Prospective Studies |
topic |
HDE ALER HSM PNEU Adolescent Adult Administration, Inhalation Asthma / drug therapy Cohort Studies Female Male Humans Middle Aged Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data Young Adult Physician-Patient Relations Prospective Studies |
description |
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance. DESIGN: Baseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies. SETTING: 29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and healthcare use were collected. Patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to inhaled controller medication during the previous week using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Discordance was defined as classification in distinct VAS categories (low 0-50; medium 51-80; high 81-100) or as an absolute difference in VAS scores ≥10 mm. Correlation between patients' and physicians' VAS scores/categories was explored. A multinomial logistic regression identified the predictors of physician overestimation and underestimation. RESULTS: High inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (rs=0.580; p<0.001). Discordance occurred in 56% of cases: in 28% physicians overestimated adherence and in 27% underestimated. Low adherence as assessed by the physician (OR=27.35 (9.85 to 75.95)), FEV1 ≥80% (OR=2.59 (1.08 to 6.20)) and a first appointment (OR=5.63 (1.24 to 25.56)) were predictors of underestimation. An uncontrolled asthma (OR=2.33 (1.25 to 4.34)), uncontrolled upper airway disease (OR=2.86 (1.35 to 6.04)) and prescription of short-acting beta-agonists alone (OR=3.05 (1.15 to 8.08)) were associated with overestimation. Medium adherence as assessed by the physician was significantly associated with higher risk of discordance, both for overestimation and underestimation of adherence (OR=14.50 (6.04 to 34.81); OR=2.21 (1.07 to 4.58)), while having a written action plan decreased the likelihood of discordance (OR=0.25 (0.12 to 0.52); OR=0.41 (0.22 to 0.78)) (R2=44%). CONCLUSION: Although both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-12T15:26:15Z 2019-11-07 2019-11-07T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3353 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3353 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e031732. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031732 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131302683738112 |