Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, S R
Data de Publicação: 1993
Outros Autores: Vital, J P, Dominguez, M L, Campos, J A
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093
Resumo: A retrospective study was made of sixty patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery, between January, 1980 and May, 1989. The standard anterior approach devised by Cloward (DEC) was used for 28 patients, and discectomy alone (DS), without bone graft, for the other 32. The postoperative stay was 2.4 times longer after DEC than after DS. Surgical complications had an incidence of 11.6%, 14.3% with DEC and 9.3% with DS. There was no mortality. A total of 57 patients were available for transversal clinical evaluation, 26 of the DEC group and 31 of the DS group. There was no difference in the success rate between the two groups. Considering the over-all results, 77.2% had good or excellent results, 10.5% had fair results and 12.3% had poor results. Patients with radicular symptoms alone had better results. Evolution of the spine stability at the level of the intervention was of no major difference between the two groups. The authors conclude that there are identical results, whatever the technique used. Still, morbidity and postoperative hospitalization are higher with Cloward's approach, which seems a good reason to restrict its use to cervical instability situations, namely traumatic cervical pathology.
id RCAP_e5f7c1a57332b9a9acd0f2edaa9e4021
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3093
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.Discectomias cervicais por via anterior.A retrospective study was made of sixty patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery, between January, 1980 and May, 1989. The standard anterior approach devised by Cloward (DEC) was used for 28 patients, and discectomy alone (DS), without bone graft, for the other 32. The postoperative stay was 2.4 times longer after DEC than after DS. Surgical complications had an incidence of 11.6%, 14.3% with DEC and 9.3% with DS. There was no mortality. A total of 57 patients were available for transversal clinical evaluation, 26 of the DEC group and 31 of the DS group. There was no difference in the success rate between the two groups. Considering the over-all results, 77.2% had good or excellent results, 10.5% had fair results and 12.3% had poor results. Patients with radicular symptoms alone had better results. Evolution of the spine stability at the level of the intervention was of no major difference between the two groups. The authors conclude that there are identical results, whatever the technique used. Still, morbidity and postoperative hospitalization are higher with Cloward's approach, which seems a good reason to restrict its use to cervical instability situations, namely traumatic cervical pathology.A retrospective study was made of sixty patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery, between January, 1980 and May, 1989. The standard anterior approach devised by Cloward (DEC) was used for 28 patients, and discectomy alone (DS), without bone graft, for the other 32. The postoperative stay was 2.4 times longer after DEC than after DS. Surgical complications had an incidence of 11.6%, 14.3% with DEC and 9.3% with DS. There was no mortality. A total of 57 patients were available for transversal clinical evaluation, 26 of the DEC group and 31 of the DS group. There was no difference in the success rate between the two groups. Considering the over-all results, 77.2% had good or excellent results, 10.5% had fair results and 12.3% had poor results. Patients with radicular symptoms alone had better results. Evolution of the spine stability at the level of the intervention was of no major difference between the two groups. The authors conclude that there are identical results, whatever the technique used. Still, morbidity and postoperative hospitalization are higher with Cloward's approach, which seems a good reason to restrict its use to cervical instability situations, namely traumatic cervical pathology.Ordem dos Médicos1993-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3093Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 6 No. 6 (1993): Junho; 249-53Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 6 N.º 6 (1993): Junho; 249-531646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093/2435Figueiredo, S RVital, J PDominguez, M LCampos, J Ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:01:38Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3093Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:18:09.250946Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
Discectomias cervicais por via anterior.
title Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
spellingShingle Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
Figueiredo, S R
title_short Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
title_full Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
title_fullStr Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
title_full_unstemmed Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
title_sort Cervical discectomies by the anterior approach.
author Figueiredo, S R
author_facet Figueiredo, S R
Vital, J P
Dominguez, M L
Campos, J A
author_role author
author2 Vital, J P
Dominguez, M L
Campos, J A
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, S R
Vital, J P
Dominguez, M L
Campos, J A
description A retrospective study was made of sixty patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery, between January, 1980 and May, 1989. The standard anterior approach devised by Cloward (DEC) was used for 28 patients, and discectomy alone (DS), without bone graft, for the other 32. The postoperative stay was 2.4 times longer after DEC than after DS. Surgical complications had an incidence of 11.6%, 14.3% with DEC and 9.3% with DS. There was no mortality. A total of 57 patients were available for transversal clinical evaluation, 26 of the DEC group and 31 of the DS group. There was no difference in the success rate between the two groups. Considering the over-all results, 77.2% had good or excellent results, 10.5% had fair results and 12.3% had poor results. Patients with radicular symptoms alone had better results. Evolution of the spine stability at the level of the intervention was of no major difference between the two groups. The authors conclude that there are identical results, whatever the technique used. Still, morbidity and postoperative hospitalization are higher with Cloward's approach, which seems a good reason to restrict its use to cervical instability situations, namely traumatic cervical pathology.
publishDate 1993
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1993-06-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3093
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/3093
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/3093/2435
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 6 No. 6 (1993): Junho; 249-53
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 6 N.º 6 (1993): Junho; 249-53
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130633571663872