Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Vânia
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Vaz,Inês, Reis,Ana Paula, Mendes,Maria José, Rodrigues,Maria do Céu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002
Resumo: Introduction:The presence of a single umbilical artery (SUA) is recognised as a soft marker for congenital anomalies, aneuploidy, earlier delivery and intra-uterine growth restriction and/or low birth weight. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of SUA in a selected population. And secondly, to examine the clinical significance of this soft marker. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis, over a 36-month period, of all cases of pregnancy interruption due to medical causes, up to 16 weeks of gestation, with prenatal diagnosis of SUA; cases of live born with a prenatal diagnosis of SUA or after delivery, at the routine examination of the placenta. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies. Results: Thirty nine cases of SUA were identified during the study period. Incidence of SUA in live born was 0.32% (n=30) and in pregnancy interruption due to medical causes was 12.9% (n=9). The antenatal detection rate was 77%. This ecographic soft marker was an isolated finding in 27 live born (90%). In live born with SUA and associated malformations (13.3%), urinary abnormalities were identified in three cases (75%), and a skeletal with esophageal malformation was identified in one case (25%). Preterm birth occurred in seven cases (23.3%) and birth weight below 10th percentile in four cases (13.3%). Discussion and conclusions: The presence of SUA in antenatal period should alert the sonographer and clinician for the need of a detailed examination of the fetus to exclude other anomalies. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies.
id RCAP_e695104dac3ebcc9249f8b04326b3dd9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-07542013000300002
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?Congenital malformationprenatal diagnosissingle umbilical arteryultrasonographyIntroduction:The presence of a single umbilical artery (SUA) is recognised as a soft marker for congenital anomalies, aneuploidy, earlier delivery and intra-uterine growth restriction and/or low birth weight. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of SUA in a selected population. And secondly, to examine the clinical significance of this soft marker. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis, over a 36-month period, of all cases of pregnancy interruption due to medical causes, up to 16 weeks of gestation, with prenatal diagnosis of SUA; cases of live born with a prenatal diagnosis of SUA or after delivery, at the routine examination of the placenta. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies. Results: Thirty nine cases of SUA were identified during the study period. Incidence of SUA in live born was 0.32% (n=30) and in pregnancy interruption due to medical causes was 12.9% (n=9). The antenatal detection rate was 77%. This ecographic soft marker was an isolated finding in 27 live born (90%). In live born with SUA and associated malformations (13.3%), urinary abnormalities were identified in three cases (75%), and a skeletal with esophageal malformation was identified in one case (25%). Preterm birth occurred in seven cases (23.3%) and birth weight below 10th percentile in four cases (13.3%). Discussion and conclusions: The presence of SUA in antenatal period should alert the sonographer and clinician for the need of a detailed examination of the fetus to exclude other anomalies. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies.Centro Hospitalar do Porto2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002Nascer e Crescer v.22 n.3 2013reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002Ferreira,VâniaVaz,InêsReis,Ana PaulaMendes,Maria JoséRodrigues,Maria do Céuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:05:36Zoai:scielo:S0872-07542013000300002Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:19:19.981870Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
title Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
spellingShingle Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
Ferreira,Vânia
Congenital malformation
prenatal diagnosis
single umbilical artery
ultrasonography
title_short Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
title_full Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
title_fullStr Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
title_full_unstemmed Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
title_sort Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: what does it mean?
author Ferreira,Vânia
author_facet Ferreira,Vânia
Vaz,Inês
Reis,Ana Paula
Mendes,Maria José
Rodrigues,Maria do Céu
author_role author
author2 Vaz,Inês
Reis,Ana Paula
Mendes,Maria José
Rodrigues,Maria do Céu
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Vânia
Vaz,Inês
Reis,Ana Paula
Mendes,Maria José
Rodrigues,Maria do Céu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Congenital malformation
prenatal diagnosis
single umbilical artery
ultrasonography
topic Congenital malformation
prenatal diagnosis
single umbilical artery
ultrasonography
description Introduction:The presence of a single umbilical artery (SUA) is recognised as a soft marker for congenital anomalies, aneuploidy, earlier delivery and intra-uterine growth restriction and/or low birth weight. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of SUA in a selected population. And secondly, to examine the clinical significance of this soft marker. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis, over a 36-month period, of all cases of pregnancy interruption due to medical causes, up to 16 weeks of gestation, with prenatal diagnosis of SUA; cases of live born with a prenatal diagnosis of SUA or after delivery, at the routine examination of the placenta. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies. Results: Thirty nine cases of SUA were identified during the study period. Incidence of SUA in live born was 0.32% (n=30) and in pregnancy interruption due to medical causes was 12.9% (n=9). The antenatal detection rate was 77%. This ecographic soft marker was an isolated finding in 27 live born (90%). In live born with SUA and associated malformations (13.3%), urinary abnormalities were identified in three cases (75%), and a skeletal with esophageal malformation was identified in one case (25%). Preterm birth occurred in seven cases (23.3%) and birth weight below 10th percentile in four cases (13.3%). Discussion and conclusions: The presence of SUA in antenatal period should alert the sonographer and clinician for the need of a detailed examination of the fetus to exclude other anomalies. Fetal growth and the risk of preterm labor are also to consider in the surveillance of these pregnancies.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-07542013000300002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar do Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar do Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Nascer e Crescer v.22 n.3 2013
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137283242196992