Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, J.
Data de Publicação: 2002
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/488
Resumo: Karl Polanyi’s contributions to social theory are widely recognised among the generality of social sciences. In the fields of economic anthropology, historical and economic sociology and economic history, Polanyi’s work, in particular The Great Transformation, is considered a classic2. In this article we want to explore its relevance to economic science in general and to the issue of endogeneity of human preferences in particular. By endogenous preferences, following Bowles (1998), we understand the still highly neglected idea in economic theory that individual preferences, that is, reasons for behaviour or attributes of individuals that (along with their beliefs and capacities) account for the actions they take in a given situation (Bowles, 1998: 78), are at least partially formed and moulded by institutions and that this should be taken into account by economists. By analysing Polanyi’s methodological insights, emphasising its opposition between a formalistic and a substantive science of economics we will be in a good position to appreciate the link between these methodological considerations, a more realistic version on preferences and the indispensable need to construct an economic theory which takes into account the moral and political dimensions.
id RCAP_e6e5ec2dfeff2e4b6b590c679b620ad1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/488
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl PolanyiEndogenous preferencesEmbeddednessPolanyiKarl Polanyi’s contributions to social theory are widely recognised among the generality of social sciences. In the fields of economic anthropology, historical and economic sociology and economic history, Polanyi’s work, in particular The Great Transformation, is considered a classic2. In this article we want to explore its relevance to economic science in general and to the issue of endogeneity of human preferences in particular. By endogenous preferences, following Bowles (1998), we understand the still highly neglected idea in economic theory that individual preferences, that is, reasons for behaviour or attributes of individuals that (along with their beliefs and capacities) account for the actions they take in a given situation (Bowles, 1998: 78), are at least partially formed and moulded by institutions and that this should be taken into account by economists. By analysing Polanyi’s methodological insights, emphasising its opposition between a formalistic and a substantive science of economics we will be in a good position to appreciate the link between these methodological considerations, a more realistic version on preferences and the indispensable need to construct an economic theory which takes into account the moral and political dimensions.Dinâmia2007-07-18T10:56:43Z2002-01-01T00:00:00Z2002info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/488engRodrigues, J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:46:49Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/488Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:22:37.523607Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
title Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
spellingShingle Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
Rodrigues, J.
Endogenous preferences
Embeddedness
Polanyi
title_short Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
title_full Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
title_fullStr Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
title_full_unstemmed Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
title_sort Endogenous preferences and embeddedness: implications for economic theory. A reappraisal of Karl Polanyi
author Rodrigues, J.
author_facet Rodrigues, J.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endogenous preferences
Embeddedness
Polanyi
topic Endogenous preferences
Embeddedness
Polanyi
description Karl Polanyi’s contributions to social theory are widely recognised among the generality of social sciences. In the fields of economic anthropology, historical and economic sociology and economic history, Polanyi’s work, in particular The Great Transformation, is considered a classic2. In this article we want to explore its relevance to economic science in general and to the issue of endogeneity of human preferences in particular. By endogenous preferences, following Bowles (1998), we understand the still highly neglected idea in economic theory that individual preferences, that is, reasons for behaviour or attributes of individuals that (along with their beliefs and capacities) account for the actions they take in a given situation (Bowles, 1998: 78), are at least partially formed and moulded by institutions and that this should be taken into account by economists. By analysing Polanyi’s methodological insights, emphasising its opposition between a formalistic and a substantive science of economics we will be in a good position to appreciate the link between these methodological considerations, a more realistic version on preferences and the indispensable need to construct an economic theory which takes into account the moral and political dimensions.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z
2002
2007-07-18T10:56:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/488
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/488
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dinâmia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dinâmia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134787695280128