Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Madureira, Helena
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Nunes, Fernando, Oliveira, José Vidal, Cormier, Laure, Madureira, Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3334
Resumo: Understanding how urban residents rate the benefits associated with urban green spaces is crucial in developing appropriate urban green infrastructure strategies. This study explores residents’ beliefs concerning the benefits of urban green spaces and investigates whether similarities and differences can be highlighted in four different French and Portuguese urban areas (Paris, Angers, Lisbon and Porto) through a questionnaire survey (n = 1000) based on the best–worst scaling (BWS) method. The results demonstrated that urban green space benefits are not equally valued among cities, suggesting that there is simultaneously a consensus among the most and least valued benefits across cities, as well as local variations in city residents’ beliefs about some other benefits of urban green spaces. For example, the importance of urban green spaces for personal health and well-being and to facilitate contact with nature were noted by residents of all four urban areas; consensus also exists on the little support given to two microclimatic functions of green spaces, namely, air temperature reduction and noise reduction. On the other hand, some green space benefits, such as the promotion of biodiversity or the contribution to the city image, are differentially valued among the four cities. Overall, the study stresses the importance of developing local assessments of the beliefs surrounding the benefits of urban green spaces. Recognizing these multiple beliefs and communicating clearly about the benefits offered by green spaces may help to mitigate future conflicts between residents and urban planners and managers, and thus contribute to optimizing green infrastructure planning benefits.
id RCAP_e7477eade232ae5a8e43cd8b3cb9457d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/3334
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and PortugalBeliefsBenefitsGreen infrastructureSurveyUrban green spacesUnderstanding how urban residents rate the benefits associated with urban green spaces is crucial in developing appropriate urban green infrastructure strategies. This study explores residents’ beliefs concerning the benefits of urban green spaces and investigates whether similarities and differences can be highlighted in four different French and Portuguese urban areas (Paris, Angers, Lisbon and Porto) through a questionnaire survey (n = 1000) based on the best–worst scaling (BWS) method. The results demonstrated that urban green space benefits are not equally valued among cities, suggesting that there is simultaneously a consensus among the most and least valued benefits across cities, as well as local variations in city residents’ beliefs about some other benefits of urban green spaces. For example, the importance of urban green spaces for personal health and well-being and to facilitate contact with nature were noted by residents of all four urban areas; consensus also exists on the little support given to two microclimatic functions of green spaces, namely, air temperature reduction and noise reduction. On the other hand, some green space benefits, such as the promotion of biodiversity or the contribution to the city image, are differentially valued among the four cities. Overall, the study stresses the importance of developing local assessments of the beliefs surrounding the benefits of urban green spaces. Recognizing these multiple beliefs and communicating clearly about the benefits offered by green spaces may help to mitigate future conflicts between residents and urban planners and managers, and thus contribute to optimizing green infrastructure planning benefits.2023-05-30T15:36:48Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152022-12-14T16:04:47Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3334por1618-866710.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008Madureira, HelenaNunes, FernandoOliveira, José VidalCormier, LaureMadureira, Teresainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-01T06:45:14Zoai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/3334Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:59:33.956205Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
title Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
spellingShingle Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
Madureira, Helena
Beliefs
Benefits
Green infrastructure
Survey
Urban green spaces
title_short Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
title_full Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
title_fullStr Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
title_sort Urban residents beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal
author Madureira, Helena
author_facet Madureira, Helena
Nunes, Fernando
Oliveira, José Vidal
Cormier, Laure
Madureira, Teresa
author_role author
author2 Nunes, Fernando
Oliveira, José Vidal
Cormier, Laure
Madureira, Teresa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Madureira, Helena
Nunes, Fernando
Oliveira, José Vidal
Cormier, Laure
Madureira, Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beliefs
Benefits
Green infrastructure
Survey
Urban green spaces
topic Beliefs
Benefits
Green infrastructure
Survey
Urban green spaces
description Understanding how urban residents rate the benefits associated with urban green spaces is crucial in developing appropriate urban green infrastructure strategies. This study explores residents’ beliefs concerning the benefits of urban green spaces and investigates whether similarities and differences can be highlighted in four different French and Portuguese urban areas (Paris, Angers, Lisbon and Porto) through a questionnaire survey (n = 1000) based on the best–worst scaling (BWS) method. The results demonstrated that urban green space benefits are not equally valued among cities, suggesting that there is simultaneously a consensus among the most and least valued benefits across cities, as well as local variations in city residents’ beliefs about some other benefits of urban green spaces. For example, the importance of urban green spaces for personal health and well-being and to facilitate contact with nature were noted by residents of all four urban areas; consensus also exists on the little support given to two microclimatic functions of green spaces, namely, air temperature reduction and noise reduction. On the other hand, some green space benefits, such as the promotion of biodiversity or the contribution to the city image, are differentially valued among the four cities. Overall, the study stresses the importance of developing local assessments of the beliefs surrounding the benefits of urban green spaces. Recognizing these multiple beliefs and communicating clearly about the benefits offered by green spaces may help to mitigate future conflicts between residents and urban planners and managers, and thus contribute to optimizing green infrastructure planning benefits.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015
2022-12-14T16:04:47Z
2023-05-30T15:36:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3334
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3334
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1618-8667
10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131665149198336