Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lalande, Alain
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Chen, Zhihao, Pommier, Thibaut, Decourselle, Thomas, Qayyum, Abdul, Salomon, Michel, Ginhac, Dominique, Skandarani, Youssef, Boucher, Arnaud, Brahim, Khawla, de Bruijne, Marleen, Camarasa, Robin, Correia, Teresa, Feng, Xue, Girum, Kibrom B., Hennemuth, Anja, Huellebrand, Markus, Hussain, Raabid, Ivantsits, Matthias, Ma, Jun, Meyer, Craig, Sharma, Rishabh, Shi, Jixi, Tsekos, Nikolaos V., Varela, Marta, Wang, Xiyue, Yang, Sen, Zhang, Hannu, Zhang, Yichi, Zhou, Yuncheng, Zhuang, Xiahai, Couturier, Raphael, Meriaudeau, Fabrice
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18534
Resumo: A key factor for assessing the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is to measure whether the myocardium segment is viable after reperfusion or revascularization therapy. Delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI, which is performed 10 min after injection of the contrast agent, provides high contrast between viable and nonviable myocardium and is therefore a method of choice to evaluate the extent of MI. To automatically assess myocardial status, the results of the EMIDEC challenge that focused on this task are presented in this paper. The challenge's main objectives were twofold. First, to evaluate if deep learning methods can distinguish between non-infarct and pathological exams, i.e. exams with or without hyperenhanced area. Second, to automatically calculate the extent of myocardial infarction. The publicly available database consists of 150 exams divided into 50 cases without any hyperenhanced area after injection of a contrast agent and 100 cases with myocardial infarction (and then with a hyperenhanced area on DE-MRI), whatever their inclusion in the cardiac emergency department. Along with MRI, clinical characteristics are also provided. The obtained results issued from several works show that the automatic classification of an exam is a reachable task (the best method providing an accuracy of 0.92), and the automatic segmentation of the myocardium is possible. However, the segmentation of the diseased area needs to be improved, mainly due to the small size of these areas and the lack of contrast with the surrounding structures.
id RCAP_e75ab0c7493febd061f12e8f6ed64f78
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18534
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challengeDE-MRIMyocardiumInfarctionCNNA key factor for assessing the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is to measure whether the myocardium segment is viable after reperfusion or revascularization therapy. Delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI, which is performed 10 min after injection of the contrast agent, provides high contrast between viable and nonviable myocardium and is therefore a method of choice to evaluate the extent of MI. To automatically assess myocardial status, the results of the EMIDEC challenge that focused on this task are presented in this paper. The challenge's main objectives were twofold. First, to evaluate if deep learning methods can distinguish between non-infarct and pathological exams, i.e. exams with or without hyperenhanced area. Second, to automatically calculate the extent of myocardial infarction. The publicly available database consists of 150 exams divided into 50 cases without any hyperenhanced area after injection of a contrast agent and 100 cases with myocardial infarction (and then with a hyperenhanced area on DE-MRI), whatever their inclusion in the cardiac emergency department. Along with MRI, clinical characteristics are also provided. The obtained results issued from several works show that the automatic classification of an exam is a reachable task (the best method providing an accuracy of 0.92), and the automatic segmentation of the myocardium is possible. However, the segmentation of the diseased area needs to be improved, mainly due to the small size of these areas and the lack of contrast with the surrounding structures.ANR-17-EURE-0002; ANR-15-IDEX-0003ElsevierSapientiaLalande, AlainChen, ZhihaoPommier, ThibautDecourselle, ThomasQayyum, AbdulSalomon, MichelGinhac, DominiqueSkandarani, YoussefBoucher, ArnaudBrahim, Khawlade Bruijne, MarleenCamarasa, RobinCorreia, TeresaFeng, XueGirum, Kibrom B.Hennemuth, AnjaHuellebrand, MarkusHussain, RaabidIvantsits, MatthiasMa, JunMeyer, CraigSharma, RishabhShi, JixiTsekos, Nikolaos V.Varela, MartaWang, XiyueYang, SenZhang, HannuZhang, YichiZhou, YunchengZhuang, XiahaiCouturier, RaphaelMeriaudeau, Fabrice2024-03-01T01:30:13Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18534eng1361-841510.1016/j.media.2022.102428info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-06T02:03:42Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18534Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:08:17.173332Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
title Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
spellingShingle Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
Lalande, Alain
DE-MRI
Myocardium
Infarction
CNN
title_short Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
title_full Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
title_fullStr Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
title_sort Deep learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
author Lalande, Alain
author_facet Lalande, Alain
Chen, Zhihao
Pommier, Thibaut
Decourselle, Thomas
Qayyum, Abdul
Salomon, Michel
Ginhac, Dominique
Skandarani, Youssef
Boucher, Arnaud
Brahim, Khawla
de Bruijne, Marleen
Camarasa, Robin
Correia, Teresa
Feng, Xue
Girum, Kibrom B.
Hennemuth, Anja
Huellebrand, Markus
Hussain, Raabid
Ivantsits, Matthias
Ma, Jun
Meyer, Craig
Sharma, Rishabh
Shi, Jixi
Tsekos, Nikolaos V.
Varela, Marta
Wang, Xiyue
Yang, Sen
Zhang, Hannu
Zhang, Yichi
Zhou, Yuncheng
Zhuang, Xiahai
Couturier, Raphael
Meriaudeau, Fabrice
author_role author
author2 Chen, Zhihao
Pommier, Thibaut
Decourselle, Thomas
Qayyum, Abdul
Salomon, Michel
Ginhac, Dominique
Skandarani, Youssef
Boucher, Arnaud
Brahim, Khawla
de Bruijne, Marleen
Camarasa, Robin
Correia, Teresa
Feng, Xue
Girum, Kibrom B.
Hennemuth, Anja
Huellebrand, Markus
Hussain, Raabid
Ivantsits, Matthias
Ma, Jun
Meyer, Craig
Sharma, Rishabh
Shi, Jixi
Tsekos, Nikolaos V.
Varela, Marta
Wang, Xiyue
Yang, Sen
Zhang, Hannu
Zhang, Yichi
Zhou, Yuncheng
Zhuang, Xiahai
Couturier, Raphael
Meriaudeau, Fabrice
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lalande, Alain
Chen, Zhihao
Pommier, Thibaut
Decourselle, Thomas
Qayyum, Abdul
Salomon, Michel
Ginhac, Dominique
Skandarani, Youssef
Boucher, Arnaud
Brahim, Khawla
de Bruijne, Marleen
Camarasa, Robin
Correia, Teresa
Feng, Xue
Girum, Kibrom B.
Hennemuth, Anja
Huellebrand, Markus
Hussain, Raabid
Ivantsits, Matthias
Ma, Jun
Meyer, Craig
Sharma, Rishabh
Shi, Jixi
Tsekos, Nikolaos V.
Varela, Marta
Wang, Xiyue
Yang, Sen
Zhang, Hannu
Zhang, Yichi
Zhou, Yuncheng
Zhuang, Xiahai
Couturier, Raphael
Meriaudeau, Fabrice
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DE-MRI
Myocardium
Infarction
CNN
topic DE-MRI
Myocardium
Infarction
CNN
description A key factor for assessing the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is to measure whether the myocardium segment is viable after reperfusion or revascularization therapy. Delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI, which is performed 10 min after injection of the contrast agent, provides high contrast between viable and nonviable myocardium and is therefore a method of choice to evaluate the extent of MI. To automatically assess myocardial status, the results of the EMIDEC challenge that focused on this task are presented in this paper. The challenge's main objectives were twofold. First, to evaluate if deep learning methods can distinguish between non-infarct and pathological exams, i.e. exams with or without hyperenhanced area. Second, to automatically calculate the extent of myocardial infarction. The publicly available database consists of 150 exams divided into 50 cases without any hyperenhanced area after injection of a contrast agent and 100 cases with myocardial infarction (and then with a hyperenhanced area on DE-MRI), whatever their inclusion in the cardiac emergency department. Along with MRI, clinical characteristics are also provided. The obtained results issued from several works show that the automatic classification of an exam is a reachable task (the best method providing an accuracy of 0.92), and the automatic segmentation of the myocardium is possible. However, the segmentation of the diseased area needs to be improved, mainly due to the small size of these areas and the lack of contrast with the surrounding structures.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024-03-01T01:30:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18534
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18534
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1361-8415
10.1016/j.media.2022.102428
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133328389963776