Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moniz, João Vargas
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Barroca, Rita, Casaca, Rui, Costa, C. Santos, Almeida, J. C. Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250
Resumo: There is no indication for lymph node staging in patients with DCIS. However a significant number of core-needle biopsy (CNB)- diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) operative specimens have invasive carcinoma, demanding further surgery for lymph node staging. The objectives of our study are to find predictive factors of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases in patients with pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS, and to establish criteria for lymph node staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The authors retrospectively evaluated 140 consecutive patients with CNB/Vacuum assisted-diagnosed DCIS who were submitted to excision at our institution between August, 2000 and September 2007. Hi-grade DCIS was found in 41.4% of patients and 60% had necrosis. 120 patients had conservative breast cancer surgery. Lymph node staging was done simultaneously in 25 patients (5 with SLN biopsy) and in 35 patients after diagnosis of invasive carcinoma in the operative specimens. We found invasive carcinoma in 37.1% of patients and lymph node metastases in 5.7%. Median tumour size was 25,8 mm in patients with invasive carcinoma and 16,0 mm with pure DCIS (P=0.001). Necrosis and tumour grade on CNB were not predictive of invasive carcinoma on the operative specimens. Size was the predictive factor of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases. Only tumours≤10 mm had no lymph node metastases. Tumours greater than 40 mm had 37% lymph node metastases. In conclusion there is no indication for SLN biopsy in patients with tumours smaller than 10 mm but this procedure should be performed in tumours greater than 40 mm. Patients with tumours greater than 10 mm and smaller than 40 mm, who wish to avoid a second surgery for lymph node staging should also be offered SLN biopsy. 
id RCAP_e7d4884163700fe1fff9aa19d4aeab3f
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.spcir.com:article/250
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)Indicações para biópsia de gânglio sentinela em doentes com diagnóstico de carcinoma ductal in situ por microbiópsiaThere is no indication for lymph node staging in patients with DCIS. However a significant number of core-needle biopsy (CNB)- diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) operative specimens have invasive carcinoma, demanding further surgery for lymph node staging. The objectives of our study are to find predictive factors of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases in patients with pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS, and to establish criteria for lymph node staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The authors retrospectively evaluated 140 consecutive patients with CNB/Vacuum assisted-diagnosed DCIS who were submitted to excision at our institution between August, 2000 and September 2007. Hi-grade DCIS was found in 41.4% of patients and 60% had necrosis. 120 patients had conservative breast cancer surgery. Lymph node staging was done simultaneously in 25 patients (5 with SLN biopsy) and in 35 patients after diagnosis of invasive carcinoma in the operative specimens. We found invasive carcinoma in 37.1% of patients and lymph node metastases in 5.7%. Median tumour size was 25,8 mm in patients with invasive carcinoma and 16,0 mm with pure DCIS (P=0.001). Necrosis and tumour grade on CNB were not predictive of invasive carcinoma on the operative specimens. Size was the predictive factor of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases. Only tumours≤10 mm had no lymph node metastases. Tumours greater than 40 mm had 37% lymph node metastases. In conclusion there is no indication for SLN biopsy in patients with tumours smaller than 10 mm but this procedure should be performed in tumours greater than 40 mm. Patients with tumours greater than 10 mm and smaller than 40 mm, who wish to avoid a second surgery for lymph node staging should also be offered SLN biopsy. O estadiamento ganglionar não tem indicação para ser realizado nos doentes com CDIS. No entanto, uma percentagem significativa de doentes com diagnóstico de CDIS por microbiópsia ou mamótomo apresentam focos de invasão na peça operatória obrigando a procedimentos subsequentes para estadiamento ganglionar. O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os factores preditívos da invasão tumoral e da metastização ganglionar nos doentes com diagnóstico pré-operatório de CDIS,para seleccionar quais devem realizar no mesmo tempo biópsia de gânglio sentinela. Realizámos um estudo retrospectivo de 140 doentes que, entre Agosto de 2000 e Setembro de 2007, foram submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico no nosso Serviço. Em 4 1.4% dos doentes, o C DIS foi classificado de alto grau e 60% apresentavam necrose. 12C0 doentes foram submetidos atumorectomia e os restantes a mastectomia. O estadiamento ganglionar foi realizado no mesmo tempo operatório em 25 doentes (5 por biópsia gânglio sentinela) e deforma diferida, por linfadenectomia axilar, em 35 doentes. Nas peças operatórias foi detectado componente invasivo em 37.1% e metastização ganglionar em 5.7%. A dimensão média dos tumores, com e sem componente invasivo, foi 25.8 mm e16.0 mm (P=0.001). Apenas os doentes com tumores 510 mm não apresentaram qualquer caso de metastização ganglionar. Ofactorpreditivo da presença de componente invasivo é a dimensão do tumor. O grau e a presença de necrose não são preditivos da presença de componente invasivo. O tamanho é igualmente o único factor preditivo da metastização ganglionar Não há indicação para a realização de biópsia de gânglio sentinela nos doentes com diagnóstico de CDIS por micro- biópsia com tumores até 10 mm. Esta deve ser realizada em doentes com tumores>40 mm e em todos os doentes propostos para mastectomia.Esta pode ser proposta a doentes com tumores entre 10 e 40 mm, em que se prevê que atumorectomiairáinterferircom a reali- zação da biopsia de gânglio sentinela em segundo tempo ou que desejem evitar esse segundo procedimento. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2008-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No. 6 (2008): Setembro 2008 - II Série; 17-20Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; N.º 6 (2008): Setembro 2008 - II Série; 17-202183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250/249Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoniz, João VargasBarroca, RitaCasaca, RuiCosta, C. SantosAlmeida, J. C. Mendes2024-10-24T16:51:54Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/250Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-10-24T16:51:54Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
Indicações para biópsia de gânglio sentinela em doentes com diagnóstico de carcinoma ductal in situ por microbiópsia
title Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
spellingShingle Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
Moniz, João Vargas
title_short Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
title_full Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
title_fullStr Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
title_full_unstemmed Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
title_sort Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with core- needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
author Moniz, João Vargas
author_facet Moniz, João Vargas
Barroca, Rita
Casaca, Rui
Costa, C. Santos
Almeida, J. C. Mendes
author_role author
author2 Barroca, Rita
Casaca, Rui
Costa, C. Santos
Almeida, J. C. Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moniz, João Vargas
Barroca, Rita
Casaca, Rui
Costa, C. Santos
Almeida, J. C. Mendes
description There is no indication for lymph node staging in patients with DCIS. However a significant number of core-needle biopsy (CNB)- diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) operative specimens have invasive carcinoma, demanding further surgery for lymph node staging. The objectives of our study are to find predictive factors of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases in patients with pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS, and to establish criteria for lymph node staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The authors retrospectively evaluated 140 consecutive patients with CNB/Vacuum assisted-diagnosed DCIS who were submitted to excision at our institution between August, 2000 and September 2007. Hi-grade DCIS was found in 41.4% of patients and 60% had necrosis. 120 patients had conservative breast cancer surgery. Lymph node staging was done simultaneously in 25 patients (5 with SLN biopsy) and in 35 patients after diagnosis of invasive carcinoma in the operative specimens. We found invasive carcinoma in 37.1% of patients and lymph node metastases in 5.7%. Median tumour size was 25,8 mm in patients with invasive carcinoma and 16,0 mm with pure DCIS (P=0.001). Necrosis and tumour grade on CNB were not predictive of invasive carcinoma on the operative specimens. Size was the predictive factor of invasive carcinoma and lymph node metastases. Only tumours≤10 mm had no lymph node metastases. Tumours greater than 40 mm had 37% lymph node metastases. In conclusion there is no indication for SLN biopsy in patients with tumours smaller than 10 mm but this procedure should be performed in tumours greater than 40 mm. Patients with tumours greater than 10 mm and smaller than 40 mm, who wish to avoid a second surgery for lymph node staging should also be offered SLN biopsy. 
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-09-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250
url https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/250/249
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No. 6 (2008): Setembro 2008 - II Série; 17-20
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; N.º 6 (2008): Setembro 2008 - II Série; 17-20
2183-1165
1646-6918
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817548611848765440