Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ksiazek, Thomas B.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Kim, Su Jung, Nelson, Jacob L., Park, Ahran, Patankar, Sushobhan, Sabalaskey, Olivia, Taneja, Harsh
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071
Resumo: Trust in news is declining globally and has been for some time a phenomenon that has been amplified in the context of a global pandemic, the rise in anti-media populism, and social and political unrest. Overall, public trust in journalism remains low (44% globally), according to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Building on a growing body of research on predictors of (dis)trust among news audiences, this study examines survey data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 to explore distrust profiles—comparative profiles of users based on their relative distrust in news in general, news they consume, and news accessed through digital intermediaries like social and search—across distinct news environments: India, South Korea, and the US. We conclude that, across all three countries, there are large segments who either trust everything or distrust everything, suggesting a trust polarization phenomenon. Moreover, the results identify segments of swing trusters, users who trust some news and distrust other types but do not indicate a blanket tendency to trust or distrust everything. Normative expectations about the institution of journalism (i.e., folk theories) seem to be the most powerful factors in explaining the relative likelihood of membership in all profiles, where expectations regarding impartiality, concern about fake news, and fair coverage were important indicators of (dis)trust, with varying degrees depending on the media, political, and technological contexts in which they are situated. These findings suggest that to regain trust, journalists should consider how they can change people’s folk theories when it comes to news by comprehensively taking into account the unique trajectory of a given country’s media system.
id RCAP_ea8ed44b3732657dcf08db3d880ac26b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7071
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisisdigital intermediaries; distrust profiles; journalism folk theories; media systems; news audiences; news distrust; swing trusters; trust polarizationTrust in news is declining globally and has been for some time a phenomenon that has been amplified in the context of a global pandemic, the rise in anti-media populism, and social and political unrest. Overall, public trust in journalism remains low (44% globally), according to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Building on a growing body of research on predictors of (dis)trust among news audiences, this study examines survey data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 to explore distrust profiles—comparative profiles of users based on their relative distrust in news in general, news they consume, and news accessed through digital intermediaries like social and search—across distinct news environments: India, South Korea, and the US. We conclude that, across all three countries, there are large segments who either trust everything or distrust everything, suggesting a trust polarization phenomenon. Moreover, the results identify segments of swing trusters, users who trust some news and distrust other types but do not indicate a blanket tendency to trust or distrust everything. Normative expectations about the institution of journalism (i.e., folk theories) seem to be the most powerful factors in explaining the relative likelihood of membership in all profiles, where expectations regarding impartiality, concern about fake news, and fair coverage were important indicators of (dis)trust, with varying degrees depending on the media, political, and technological contexts in which they are situated. These findings suggest that to regain trust, journalists should consider how they can change people’s folk theories when it comes to news by comprehensively taking into account the unique trajectory of a given country’s media system.Cogitatio Press2023-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Trust, Social Cohesion, and Information Quality in Digital Journalism; 308-3192183-243910.17645/mac.i366reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7071https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7071/3507https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/7071/3403Copyright (c) 2023 Thomas B. Ksiazek, Su Jung Kim, Jacob L. Nelson, Ahran Park, Sushobhan Patankar, Olivia Sabalaskey, Harsh Tanejainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKsiazek, Thomas B.Kim, Su JungNelson, Jacob L.Park, AhranPatankar, SushobhanSabalaskey, OliviaTaneja, Harsh2023-12-07T17:45:30Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7071Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:41:31.021302Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
title Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
spellingShingle Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
Ksiazek, Thomas B.
digital intermediaries; distrust profiles; journalism folk theories; media systems; news audiences; news distrust; swing trusters; trust polarization
title_short Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
title_full Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
title_fullStr Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
title_full_unstemmed Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
title_sort Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis
author Ksiazek, Thomas B.
author_facet Ksiazek, Thomas B.
Kim, Su Jung
Nelson, Jacob L.
Park, Ahran
Patankar, Sushobhan
Sabalaskey, Olivia
Taneja, Harsh
author_role author
author2 Kim, Su Jung
Nelson, Jacob L.
Park, Ahran
Patankar, Sushobhan
Sabalaskey, Olivia
Taneja, Harsh
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ksiazek, Thomas B.
Kim, Su Jung
Nelson, Jacob L.
Park, Ahran
Patankar, Sushobhan
Sabalaskey, Olivia
Taneja, Harsh
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digital intermediaries; distrust profiles; journalism folk theories; media systems; news audiences; news distrust; swing trusters; trust polarization
topic digital intermediaries; distrust profiles; journalism folk theories; media systems; news audiences; news distrust; swing trusters; trust polarization
description Trust in news is declining globally and has been for some time a phenomenon that has been amplified in the context of a global pandemic, the rise in anti-media populism, and social and political unrest. Overall, public trust in journalism remains low (44% globally), according to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Building on a growing body of research on predictors of (dis)trust among news audiences, this study examines survey data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 to explore distrust profiles—comparative profiles of users based on their relative distrust in news in general, news they consume, and news accessed through digital intermediaries like social and search—across distinct news environments: India, South Korea, and the US. We conclude that, across all three countries, there are large segments who either trust everything or distrust everything, suggesting a trust polarization phenomenon. Moreover, the results identify segments of swing trusters, users who trust some news and distrust other types but do not indicate a blanket tendency to trust or distrust everything. Normative expectations about the institution of journalism (i.e., folk theories) seem to be the most powerful factors in explaining the relative likelihood of membership in all profiles, where expectations regarding impartiality, concern about fake news, and fair coverage were important indicators of (dis)trust, with varying degrees depending on the media, political, and technological contexts in which they are situated. These findings suggest that to regain trust, journalists should consider how they can change people’s folk theories when it comes to news by comprehensively taking into account the unique trajectory of a given country’s media system.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7071
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7071/3507
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/7071/3403
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Trust, Social Cohesion, and Information Quality in Digital Journalism; 308-319
2183-2439
10.17645/mac.i366
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136317955637248