Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Gonçalo Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40243
Resumo: Constitutional theory may approach the subject of intergenerational equity from two main and quite different directions. The first is the so-called intergenerational paradox of constitutionalism, which concerns the authority of a constitution-making generation to bind future generations to its political choices through a combination of justiciable constitutional provisions and a relatively rigid procedure of constitutional amendment. The second is a plea to use constitutional law to protect the rights of future generational cohorts or to secure the commitment to sustainable development, given the diagnosed short-termist bias of ordinary processes of collective decision-making. Alas, these two are on an ever-recurring collision course: while the most promising way to dissolve or at least manage the intergenerational paradox is to limit the scope of constitutional choices, particularly when it comes to substantive matters of rights and policy that are deeply divisive in a pluralist society, the short- -termist bias of democratic arrangements implies that intergenerational equity can only be realized through robust constitutional safeguards. In a nutshell, addressing one of the sides of the problem increases the size of the other. I shall argue that the only way out of this dilemma is to think of future generations as an endangered minority for the purposes of judicial review of majoritarian legislation and to conceive an architecture of decision-making that enables the correction of generational externalities.
id RCAP_eb7d45c784824082e68cfab0eebfd047
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/40243
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equityEntre a espada e a parede: teoria constitucional e justiça intergeracionalgonçaloIntergenerational equityConstitutionalismShort-termismGenerational paradoxReasonable pluralismDemocratic legitimacyJudicial reviewProtection of minoritiesHeightened scrutinyEvidence-based policyConstitutional theory may approach the subject of intergenerational equity from two main and quite different directions. The first is the so-called intergenerational paradox of constitutionalism, which concerns the authority of a constitution-making generation to bind future generations to its political choices through a combination of justiciable constitutional provisions and a relatively rigid procedure of constitutional amendment. The second is a plea to use constitutional law to protect the rights of future generational cohorts or to secure the commitment to sustainable development, given the diagnosed short-termist bias of ordinary processes of collective decision-making. Alas, these two are on an ever-recurring collision course: while the most promising way to dissolve or at least manage the intergenerational paradox is to limit the scope of constitutional choices, particularly when it comes to substantive matters of rights and policy that are deeply divisive in a pluralist society, the short- -termist bias of democratic arrangements implies that intergenerational equity can only be realized through robust constitutional safeguards. In a nutshell, addressing one of the sides of the problem increases the size of the other. I shall argue that the only way out of this dilemma is to think of future generations as an endangered minority for the purposes of judicial review of majoritarian legislation and to conceive an architecture of decision-making that enables the correction of generational externalities.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaRibeiro, Gonçalo Almeida2023-02-15T14:34:22Z2022-12-142022-12-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40243por2183-184Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:45:47Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/40243Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:32:58.524726Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
Entre a espada e a parede: teoria constitucional e justiça intergeracionalgonçalo
title Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
spellingShingle Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
Ribeiro, Gonçalo Almeida
Intergenerational equity
Constitutionalism
Short-termism
Generational paradox
Reasonable pluralism
Democratic legitimacy
Judicial review
Protection of minorities
Heightened scrutiny
Evidence-based policy
title_short Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
title_full Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
title_fullStr Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
title_full_unstemmed Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
title_sort Between a rock and a hard place: constitutional theory and intergenerational equity
author Ribeiro, Gonçalo Almeida
author_facet Ribeiro, Gonçalo Almeida
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Gonçalo Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intergenerational equity
Constitutionalism
Short-termism
Generational paradox
Reasonable pluralism
Democratic legitimacy
Judicial review
Protection of minorities
Heightened scrutiny
Evidence-based policy
topic Intergenerational equity
Constitutionalism
Short-termism
Generational paradox
Reasonable pluralism
Democratic legitimacy
Judicial review
Protection of minorities
Heightened scrutiny
Evidence-based policy
description Constitutional theory may approach the subject of intergenerational equity from two main and quite different directions. The first is the so-called intergenerational paradox of constitutionalism, which concerns the authority of a constitution-making generation to bind future generations to its political choices through a combination of justiciable constitutional provisions and a relatively rigid procedure of constitutional amendment. The second is a plea to use constitutional law to protect the rights of future generational cohorts or to secure the commitment to sustainable development, given the diagnosed short-termist bias of ordinary processes of collective decision-making. Alas, these two are on an ever-recurring collision course: while the most promising way to dissolve or at least manage the intergenerational paradox is to limit the scope of constitutional choices, particularly when it comes to substantive matters of rights and policy that are deeply divisive in a pluralist society, the short- -termist bias of democratic arrangements implies that intergenerational equity can only be realized through robust constitutional safeguards. In a nutshell, addressing one of the sides of the problem increases the size of the other. I shall argue that the only way out of this dilemma is to think of future generations as an endangered minority for the purposes of judicial review of majoritarian legislation and to conceive an architecture of decision-making that enables the correction of generational externalities.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-14
2022-12-14T00:00:00Z
2023-02-15T14:34:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40243
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40243
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-184X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132055210033153