The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178 |
Resumo: | When the Lisbon Treaty entered into effect, the European Parliament became a core player in the decision-making processes of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and its external dimensions. This new role suggested a shift towards stronger politicization in what had previously been a rather technocratic policy field. However, the CFP is not yet marked by a clear and consistent level of politicization. I use the concept of ‘layered politicization’ to explain this pattern. Although it is not comparable to the degree of political controversy shaping fully politicized policy fields, some similar political dynamics can be observed. Among them is a transformation in the policy process due to higher ratification requirements; a higher likelihood of political deadlock resulting from an increasing number of veto-players; and a strengthening of the contested legitimacy of EU decision-making. An empirical test of these theoretical propositions is provided here in the form of two case studies; the negotiation of Fisheries Partnership Agreements with Morocco and Mauritania. |
id |
RCAP_ec44cf85ac86494a81639d4ae8153cc4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2178 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policycommon fisheries policy, European Parliament, fisheries partnership agreements, politicizationWhen the Lisbon Treaty entered into effect, the European Parliament became a core player in the decision-making processes of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and its external dimensions. This new role suggested a shift towards stronger politicization in what had previously been a rather technocratic policy field. However, the CFP is not yet marked by a clear and consistent level of politicization. I use the concept of ‘layered politicization’ to explain this pattern. Although it is not comparable to the degree of political controversy shaping fully politicized policy fields, some similar political dynamics can be observed. Among them is a transformation in the policy process due to higher ratification requirements; a higher likelihood of political deadlock resulting from an increasing number of veto-players; and a strengthening of the contested legitimacy of EU decision-making. An empirical test of these theoretical propositions is provided here in the form of two case studies; the negotiation of Fisheries Partnership Agreements with Morocco and Mauritania.Cogitatio2019-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2178Politics and Governance; Vol 7, No 3 (2019): Out of the Shadows, Into the Limelight: Parliaments and Politicisation; 237-2472183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2178https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2178/2178Copyright (c) 2019 Hubert Zimmermannhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZimmermann, Hubert2022-12-22T15:16:47Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2178Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:28.785791Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
title |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
spellingShingle |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy Zimmermann, Hubert common fisheries policy, European Parliament, fisheries partnership agreements, politicization |
title_short |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
title_full |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
title_fullStr |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
title_sort |
The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy |
author |
Zimmermann, Hubert |
author_facet |
Zimmermann, Hubert |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zimmermann, Hubert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
common fisheries policy, European Parliament, fisheries partnership agreements, politicization |
topic |
common fisheries policy, European Parliament, fisheries partnership agreements, politicization |
description |
When the Lisbon Treaty entered into effect, the European Parliament became a core player in the decision-making processes of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and its external dimensions. This new role suggested a shift towards stronger politicization in what had previously been a rather technocratic policy field. However, the CFP is not yet marked by a clear and consistent level of politicization. I use the concept of ‘layered politicization’ to explain this pattern. Although it is not comparable to the degree of political controversy shaping fully politicized policy fields, some similar political dynamics can be observed. Among them is a transformation in the policy process due to higher ratification requirements; a higher likelihood of political deadlock resulting from an increasing number of veto-players; and a strengthening of the contested legitimacy of EU decision-making. An empirical test of these theoretical propositions is provided here in the form of two case studies; the negotiation of Fisheries Partnership Agreements with Morocco and Mauritania. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2178 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2178 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2178 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2178 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2178/2178 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Hubert Zimmermann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Hubert Zimmermann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 7, No 3 (2019): Out of the Shadows, Into the Limelight: Parliaments and Politicisation; 237-247 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130670359904256 |