Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matta-Coelho, C
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Monteiro, AM, Fernandes, V, Pereira, ML, Souto, SB
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/1276
Resumo: PURPOSE: The criteria to screen for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus are not internationally consensual. In opposition to the universal screening performed in Portugal, certain countries advocate a risk-factor-based screening. We aim to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without risk factors treated for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. METHODS: Retrospective and multicentric study of 12,006 pregnant women diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus between 2011 and 2015, in Portugal. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus was diagnosed according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. RISK FACTORS: body mass index > 30kg/m2, history of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, history of macrossomic newborn (birth weight > 4000 g) or first-degree relatives with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: lack of data concerning risk factors (n = 1563). RESULTS: At least one risk factor was found in 68.2% (n = 7123) pregnant women. Pregnant women with risk factors were more frequently medicated with insulin (p < 0.001), caesarean section was more commonly performed (p < 0.001), their newborns were more frequently large-for-gestational-age (p < 0.001) and neonatal morbidity was higher (p = 0.040) in comparison to pregnant women without risk factors. The Diabetes Mellitus reclassification test showed an increased frequency of intermediate hyperglycaemia and Diabetes Mellitus in women with risk factors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of pregnant women would have remained undiagnosed if risk-based-factor screening were implemented in Portugal. Women without risk factors presented fewer obstetric and neonatal complications. However, more than one third required insulin therap
id RCAP_ec81512937abb94758ae562dab3374d0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/1276
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese CohortDiabetes GestacionalPURPOSE: The criteria to screen for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus are not internationally consensual. In opposition to the universal screening performed in Portugal, certain countries advocate a risk-factor-based screening. We aim to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without risk factors treated for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. METHODS: Retrospective and multicentric study of 12,006 pregnant women diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus between 2011 and 2015, in Portugal. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus was diagnosed according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. RISK FACTORS: body mass index > 30kg/m2, history of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, history of macrossomic newborn (birth weight > 4000 g) or first-degree relatives with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: lack of data concerning risk factors (n = 1563). RESULTS: At least one risk factor was found in 68.2% (n = 7123) pregnant women. Pregnant women with risk factors were more frequently medicated with insulin (p < 0.001), caesarean section was more commonly performed (p < 0.001), their newborns were more frequently large-for-gestational-age (p < 0.001) and neonatal morbidity was higher (p = 0.040) in comparison to pregnant women without risk factors. The Diabetes Mellitus reclassification test showed an increased frequency of intermediate hyperglycaemia and Diabetes Mellitus in women with risk factors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of pregnant women would have remained undiagnosed if risk-based-factor screening were implemented in Portugal. Women without risk factors presented fewer obstetric and neonatal complications. However, more than one third required insulin therapRepositório Científico do Hospital de BragaMatta-Coelho, CMonteiro, AMFernandes, VPereira, MLSouto, SB2018-09-28T14:53:11Z2018-09-25T00:00:00Z2018-09-25T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/1276engEndocrine. 2018 Sep 25. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1760-8.10.1007/s12020-018-1760-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T09:03:11Zoai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/1276Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:48.815868Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
title Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
spellingShingle Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
Matta-Coelho, C
Diabetes Gestacional
title_short Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
title_full Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
title_fullStr Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
title_sort Universal vs. risk-factor-based screening for gestational diabetes-an analysis from a 5-Year Portuguese Cohort
author Matta-Coelho, C
author_facet Matta-Coelho, C
Monteiro, AM
Fernandes, V
Pereira, ML
Souto, SB
author_role author
author2 Monteiro, AM
Fernandes, V
Pereira, ML
Souto, SB
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Hospital de Braga
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matta-Coelho, C
Monteiro, AM
Fernandes, V
Pereira, ML
Souto, SB
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes Gestacional
topic Diabetes Gestacional
description PURPOSE: The criteria to screen for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus are not internationally consensual. In opposition to the universal screening performed in Portugal, certain countries advocate a risk-factor-based screening. We aim to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without risk factors treated for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. METHODS: Retrospective and multicentric study of 12,006 pregnant women diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus between 2011 and 2015, in Portugal. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus was diagnosed according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. RISK FACTORS: body mass index > 30kg/m2, history of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, history of macrossomic newborn (birth weight > 4000 g) or first-degree relatives with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: lack of data concerning risk factors (n = 1563). RESULTS: At least one risk factor was found in 68.2% (n = 7123) pregnant women. Pregnant women with risk factors were more frequently medicated with insulin (p < 0.001), caesarean section was more commonly performed (p < 0.001), their newborns were more frequently large-for-gestational-age (p < 0.001) and neonatal morbidity was higher (p = 0.040) in comparison to pregnant women without risk factors. The Diabetes Mellitus reclassification test showed an increased frequency of intermediate hyperglycaemia and Diabetes Mellitus in women with risk factors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of pregnant women would have remained undiagnosed if risk-based-factor screening were implemented in Portugal. Women without risk factors presented fewer obstetric and neonatal complications. However, more than one third required insulin therap
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-28T14:53:11Z
2018-09-25T00:00:00Z
2018-09-25T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/1276
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/1276
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Endocrine. 2018 Sep 25. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1760-8.
10.1007/s12020-018-1760-8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130426948714496