Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166 |
Resumo: | The continuous increase in the number of Internet users and the emergence of Web 2.0, has led many researchers to focus their studies on these resources. Gender studies are not an exception. Yet, few attempts have tried to identify gender differences regarding the use of Web 2.0 tools. The purpose of this study was to identify gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources reported in literature. There were found gender inequalities, such as (i) females use more online networks than males, and specially older ones; (ii) while girls use weblogs to reinforce pre-existing friendships, boys use them for “flirting” and making new friends, (iii) the percentage of female weblogs authors is much higher than that of male authors; still, boys are more likely to download music and video files; (iv) regarding wikis, males edit more than females, post more mentions to other participant’s posts and make more comments than do females overall, while female students show higher resource and wiki views, as well as uploaded documents; (v) women are more active and write more words in online discussion forums than males and (vi) men use more chats than women and both genders differ in discourse style; while women show more emotions, men tend to be judgmental and use more violent verbs. |
id |
RCAP_ed1a839726b02358ffef57c5ebb733d3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/4166 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resourcesThe continuous increase in the number of Internet users and the emergence of Web 2.0, has led many researchers to focus their studies on these resources. Gender studies are not an exception. Yet, few attempts have tried to identify gender differences regarding the use of Web 2.0 tools. The purpose of this study was to identify gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources reported in literature. There were found gender inequalities, such as (i) females use more online networks than males, and specially older ones; (ii) while girls use weblogs to reinforce pre-existing friendships, boys use them for “flirting” and making new friends, (iii) the percentage of female weblogs authors is much higher than that of male authors; still, boys are more likely to download music and video files; (iv) regarding wikis, males edit more than females, post more mentions to other participant’s posts and make more comments than do females overall, while female students show higher resource and wiki views, as well as uploaded documents; (v) women are more active and write more words in online discussion forums than males and (vi) men use more chats than women and both genders differ in discourse style; while women show more emotions, men tend to be judgmental and use more violent verbs.El creciente número de usuarios de Internet y de la Web 2.0 ha llevado a muchos investigadores a centrar sus estudios sobre esas herramientas. Los estudios de género no fueron una excepción. Sin embargo, hay pocos informes sobre diferencias de género en el uso de herramientas Web 2.0. El propósito de este estudio fue identificar las diferencias de género en el uso de la Web 2.0 mencionadas en la literatura. Se han encontrado varias desigualdades de género: (i) las mujeres usan más las redes sociales do que los hombres, sobre todo las mayores; (ii) mientras las mujeres prefieren utilizar los weblogs para reforzar las amistades ya existentes, los hombres los usan para seducir y hacer nuevos amigos, (iii) el porcentaje de mujeres escritoras de los weblogs es mucho más largo que el porcentaje de hombres; por su vez, los hombres descargan más vídeos y músicas que las mujeres; (iv) respecto a las wikis, los hombres editan más comentarios que las mujeres, refieren más veces los comentarios hechos por otras personas do que las mujeres y hacen más comentarios que las mujeres, mientras las mujeres hacen más visualizaciones de la wiki y descargan más documentos; (v) las mujeres son más activas y escriben más palabras en los foros de discusión online do que los hombres; (vi) los hombres usan más salas de chat do que las mujeres y los dos géneros tienen diferentes estilos de discurso; mientras que las mujeres desvelan más sus emociones, los hombres son más críticos y usan palabras más violentas.O crescente número de utilizadores da internet e a emergência da Web 2.0 levou muitos investigadores a focarem os seus estudos nestes recursos. Os estudos de género não foram excepção. Todavia, ainda existem poucas publicações sobre diferenças de género na utilização de ferramentas da Web 2.0. O objectivo deste estudo foi identificar as diferenças de género na utilização de recursos da Web 2.0 referidas na literatura. Foram encontradas diversas desigualdades de género: (i) as mulheres usam mais as redes sociais do que os homens, sobretudo as mais velhas; (ii) enquanto as raparigas preferem usar weblogs para reforçar amizades pré-existentes, os rapazes usam-nos para seduzir e fazer novas amizades; (iii) a percentagem de raparigas autoras de weblogs é muito superior à percentagem de rapazes; por sua vez os rapazes descarregam mais músicas e vídeos do que as raparigas; (iv) relativamente a wikis, os rapazes editam mais do que as raparigas, referem mais vezes comentários feitos por outras pessoas e fazem mais comentários do que as mulheres, enquanto as mulheres fazem mais visualizações da wiki e descarregam mais documentos; (v) as mulheres são mais ativas e escrevem um maior número de palavras em fóruns de discussão online do que os homens e (vi) os homens usam mais os chats do que as mulheres e os dois géneros manifestam ainda diferenças ao nível do estilo de discurso usado; enquanto as mulheres revelam mais emoções, os homens tendem a ser mais críticos e usam palavras mais violentas.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2012-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166Indagatio Didactica; Vol 4 No 4 (2012); 6-22Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2012); 6-22Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 4 No 4 (2012); 6-22Indagatio Didactica; vol. 4 n.º 4 (2012); 6-221647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/4166https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/4166/3134Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Indagatio Didacticahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinho, Mariana2023-09-22T10:16:01Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/4166Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:05.982567Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
title |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
spellingShingle |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources Martinho, Mariana |
title_short |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
title_full |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
title_fullStr |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
title_sort |
Gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources |
author |
Martinho, Mariana |
author_facet |
Martinho, Mariana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martinho, Mariana |
description |
The continuous increase in the number of Internet users and the emergence of Web 2.0, has led many researchers to focus their studies on these resources. Gender studies are not an exception. Yet, few attempts have tried to identify gender differences regarding the use of Web 2.0 tools. The purpose of this study was to identify gender differences in the use of Web 2.0 resources reported in literature. There were found gender inequalities, such as (i) females use more online networks than males, and specially older ones; (ii) while girls use weblogs to reinforce pre-existing friendships, boys use them for “flirting” and making new friends, (iii) the percentage of female weblogs authors is much higher than that of male authors; still, boys are more likely to download music and video files; (iv) regarding wikis, males edit more than females, post more mentions to other participant’s posts and make more comments than do females overall, while female students show higher resource and wiki views, as well as uploaded documents; (v) women are more active and write more words in online discussion forums than males and (vi) men use more chats than women and both genders differ in discourse style; while women show more emotions, men tend to be judgmental and use more violent verbs. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-11-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166 https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v4i4.4166 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/4166 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/4166/3134 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Indagatio Didactica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Indagatio Didactica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Indagatio Didactica; Vol 4 No 4 (2012); 6-22 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2012); 6-22 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 4 No 4 (2012); 6-22 Indagatio Didactica; vol. 4 n.º 4 (2012); 6-22 1647-3582 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133569115750400 |