The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Álvaro Ramón Sánchez
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583
Resumo: Poverty and climate change are the main global challenges of the 21st century and also two interconnected problems. In the second half of the 20th century, new cleavages appeared, such as feminism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism, along with the social class division. The climate crisis creates the developmentalism-environmentalism dimension, which overlaps the classic distinction between left and right, and can be represented in a double ideological axis. The political debate between development and sustainability has advanced in Latin America with respect to other places due to its dependence on extractivism and its biodiversity. The impacts of extractivism have led to the appearance of two criticisms considered to be leftist but with different economic and political strategies and incompatible in many aspects: neo-extractivism and post-extractivism. In the Latin American context at the beginning of the 21st century, the relationship between neo-extractivism and eco-indigenism is complex. The conditions of possibility for the breakup of the progressive bloc are developing throughout the region, but they are especially intense in Ecuador. The division has become visible in the 2021 presidential election, in which the left-wing sweeps in the first round but surprisingly loses in the second one, showing that Ecuador’s politics are incomprehensible without adding the extractivism – post-extractivism dimension. The double ideological axis is an analysis method adaptable to the political systems of more and more countries. In addition, it is not a static tool, but its positions can be altered by political events such as the articulation of a right-wing environmentalism in Ecuador and in some European countries.
id RCAP_ed6bc8e82d296fa464ccfc59401811ec
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/583
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavageLa derrota de la izquierda en Ecuador en el cleavage extractivismo-ecologismoIdeologyCleavageEcuadorExtractivismEcologismIdeologíaCleavageEcuadorExtractivismoEcologismoPoverty and climate change are the main global challenges of the 21st century and also two interconnected problems. In the second half of the 20th century, new cleavages appeared, such as feminism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism, along with the social class division. The climate crisis creates the developmentalism-environmentalism dimension, which overlaps the classic distinction between left and right, and can be represented in a double ideological axis. The political debate between development and sustainability has advanced in Latin America with respect to other places due to its dependence on extractivism and its biodiversity. The impacts of extractivism have led to the appearance of two criticisms considered to be leftist but with different economic and political strategies and incompatible in many aspects: neo-extractivism and post-extractivism. In the Latin American context at the beginning of the 21st century, the relationship between neo-extractivism and eco-indigenism is complex. The conditions of possibility for the breakup of the progressive bloc are developing throughout the region, but they are especially intense in Ecuador. The division has become visible in the 2021 presidential election, in which the left-wing sweeps in the first round but surprisingly loses in the second one, showing that Ecuador’s politics are incomprehensible without adding the extractivism – post-extractivism dimension. The double ideological axis is an analysis method adaptable to the political systems of more and more countries. In addition, it is not a static tool, but its positions can be altered by political events such as the articulation of a right-wing environmentalism in Ecuador and in some European countries.La pobreza y el cambio climático son los principales retos mundiales del siglo XXI y también dos problemas interconectados. En la segunda mitad del siglo XX aparecen nuevas fracturas, como el feminismo, el multiculturalismo y el ecologismo, junto a la división de clase social. La crisis climática crea la dimensión desarrollismo-ecologismo, que se superpone a la clásica distinción entre izquierda y derecha, pudiendo representarse en un doble eje ideológico. El debate político entre desarrollo y sostenibilidad se ha adelantado en América Latina con respecto a otros lugares debido a su dependencia del extractivismo y a su biodiversidad. Los impactos del extractivismo han provocado la aparición de dos críticas consideradas de izquierda pero con estrategias económicas y políticas distintas y en muchos aspectos incompatibles: el neoextractivismo y el postextractivismo. En el contexto latinoamericano de principios del siglo XXI, la relación entre el neoextractivismo y el ecoindigenismo es compleja. Las condiciones de posibilidad para la ruptura del bloque progresista se desarrollan en toda la región, pero son especialmente intensas en Ecuador. La división se ha hecho visible en las elecciones presidenciales de 2021, en las que la izquierda arrasa en la primera vuelta pero pierde de manera sorprendente en la segunda, lo que demuestra que la política de Ecuador es incomprensible sin añadir la dimensión extractivismo-postextractivismo. El doble eje ideológico es un método de análisis adaptable a los sistemas políticos de cada vez más países. Además, no se trata de una herramienta estática, sino que sus posiciones pueden ser alteradas por sucesos políticos como la articulación de un ecologismo de derechas en Ecuador y en algunos países europeos.Ludomedia2022-07-08T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/583New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e583New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e583New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e5832184-777010.36367/ntqr.14.2022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPspahttps://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/583https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/583/617https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÁlvaro Ramón Sánchez2022-09-06T18:57:21ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
La derrota de la izquierda en Ecuador en el cleavage extractivismo-ecologismo
title The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
spellingShingle The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
Álvaro Ramón Sánchez
Ideology
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivism
Ecologism
Ideología
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivismo
Ecologismo
title_short The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
title_full The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
title_fullStr The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
title_full_unstemmed The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
title_sort The defeat of the left in Ecuador in the extractivism-ecology cleavage
author Álvaro Ramón Sánchez
author_facet Álvaro Ramón Sánchez
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Álvaro Ramón Sánchez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ideology
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivism
Ecologism
Ideología
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivismo
Ecologismo
topic Ideology
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivism
Ecologism
Ideología
Cleavage
Ecuador
Extractivismo
Ecologismo
description Poverty and climate change are the main global challenges of the 21st century and also two interconnected problems. In the second half of the 20th century, new cleavages appeared, such as feminism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism, along with the social class division. The climate crisis creates the developmentalism-environmentalism dimension, which overlaps the classic distinction between left and right, and can be represented in a double ideological axis. The political debate between development and sustainability has advanced in Latin America with respect to other places due to its dependence on extractivism and its biodiversity. The impacts of extractivism have led to the appearance of two criticisms considered to be leftist but with different economic and political strategies and incompatible in many aspects: neo-extractivism and post-extractivism. In the Latin American context at the beginning of the 21st century, the relationship between neo-extractivism and eco-indigenism is complex. The conditions of possibility for the breakup of the progressive bloc are developing throughout the region, but they are especially intense in Ecuador. The division has become visible in the 2021 presidential election, in which the left-wing sweeps in the first round but surprisingly loses in the second one, showing that Ecuador’s politics are incomprehensible without adding the extractivism – post-extractivism dimension. The double ideological axis is an analysis method adaptable to the political systems of more and more countries. In addition, it is not a static tool, but its positions can be altered by political events such as the articulation of a right-wing environmentalism in Ecuador and in some European countries.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-08T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583
oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/583
url https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.publi.ludomedia.org:article/583
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/583
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e583
https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/583/617
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e583
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e583
New Trends in Qualitative Research; Vol. 14 (2022): Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: Avanços e Desafios; e583
2184-7770
10.36367/ntqr.14.2022
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301429068759040