Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151505 |
Resumo: | Elderly citizens are concentrated in urban areas and are particularly affected by the immedi-ate residential environment. Cities are unequal and segregated places, where there is an intensification of urban change processes such as gentrification and displacement. We aimed to understand how neighbourhood socioeconomic processes and dynamics influence older people’s health. Three biblio-graphic databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus—were used to identify evidence of the influence of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation, socio-spatial segregation, urban renewal, and gentrification on healthy ageing. We followed the method of Arksey and O’Malley, Levac and colleagues, the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA-ScR. The included studies (n = 122) were published between 2001 and 2021. Most evaluated neighbourhood deprivation (n = 114), followed by gentrification (n = 5), segregation (n = 2), and urban renewal (n = 1). Overall, older people living in deprived neighbourhoods had worse healthy ageing outcomes than their counterparts living in more advantaged neighbourhoods. Older adults pointed out more negative comments than positive ones for gentrification and urban renewal. As to segregation, the direction of the association was not entirely clear. In conclusion, the literature has not extensively analysed the effects of segregation, gentrification, and urban renewal on healthy ageing, and more quantitative and longitudinal studies should be conducted to draw better inferences. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. |
id |
RCAP_ee1947d16b7078ee5cd5741f7ece5ae0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/151505 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Reviewage-friendly communities; gentrification; neighbourhood segregation; neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation; neighbourhood socioeconomic status; older adults; urban renewalElderly citizens are concentrated in urban areas and are particularly affected by the immedi-ate residential environment. Cities are unequal and segregated places, where there is an intensification of urban change processes such as gentrification and displacement. We aimed to understand how neighbourhood socioeconomic processes and dynamics influence older people’s health. Three biblio-graphic databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus—were used to identify evidence of the influence of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation, socio-spatial segregation, urban renewal, and gentrification on healthy ageing. We followed the method of Arksey and O’Malley, Levac and colleagues, the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA-ScR. The included studies (n = 122) were published between 2001 and 2021. Most evaluated neighbourhood deprivation (n = 114), followed by gentrification (n = 5), segregation (n = 2), and urban renewal (n = 1). Overall, older people living in deprived neighbourhoods had worse healthy ageing outcomes than their counterparts living in more advantaged neighbourhoods. Older adults pointed out more negative comments than positive ones for gentrification and urban renewal. As to segregation, the direction of the association was not entirely clear. In conclusion, the literature has not extensively analysed the effects of segregation, gentrification, and urban renewal on healthy ageing, and more quantitative and longitudinal studies should be conducted to draw better inferences. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.MDPI20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/151505eng1660-46011661-782710.3390/ijerph19116745Santos, CJPaciência, IRibeiro, AIinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:01:17Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/151505Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:13:48.342693Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
title |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
spellingShingle |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review Santos, CJ age-friendly communities; gentrification; neighbourhood segregation; neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation; neighbourhood socioeconomic status; older adults; urban renewal |
title_short |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Processes and Dynamics and Healthy Ageing: A Scoping Review |
author |
Santos, CJ |
author_facet |
Santos, CJ Paciência, I Ribeiro, AI |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paciência, I Ribeiro, AI |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, CJ Paciência, I Ribeiro, AI |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
age-friendly communities; gentrification; neighbourhood segregation; neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation; neighbourhood socioeconomic status; older adults; urban renewal |
topic |
age-friendly communities; gentrification; neighbourhood segregation; neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation; neighbourhood socioeconomic status; older adults; urban renewal |
description |
Elderly citizens are concentrated in urban areas and are particularly affected by the immedi-ate residential environment. Cities are unequal and segregated places, where there is an intensification of urban change processes such as gentrification and displacement. We aimed to understand how neighbourhood socioeconomic processes and dynamics influence older people’s health. Three biblio-graphic databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus—were used to identify evidence of the influence of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation, socio-spatial segregation, urban renewal, and gentrification on healthy ageing. We followed the method of Arksey and O’Malley, Levac and colleagues, the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA-ScR. The included studies (n = 122) were published between 2001 and 2021. Most evaluated neighbourhood deprivation (n = 114), followed by gentrification (n = 5), segregation (n = 2), and urban renewal (n = 1). Overall, older people living in deprived neighbourhoods had worse healthy ageing outcomes than their counterparts living in more advantaged neighbourhoods. Older adults pointed out more negative comments than positive ones for gentrification and urban renewal. As to segregation, the direction of the association was not entirely clear. In conclusion, the literature has not extensively analysed the effects of segregation, gentrification, and urban renewal on healthy ageing, and more quantitative and longitudinal studies should be conducted to draw better inferences. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151505 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/151505 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1660-4601 1661-7827 10.3390/ijerph19116745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136059702902784 |