Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105718
Resumo: The ever-increasing need for sustainable energy sources creates the necessity to research and develop renewable energies. An example of these is the salinity gradient energy (SGE), where power can be harvested from waters of different salinity. One type of SGE technology is Reverse Electrodialysis (RED), which was tested in this thesis in single and multistage (MSRED) setups in order to improve key parameters like power density and energy efficiency. Simulations using a Phyton model developed at Wetsus showed that a multistage setup with 2 stacks in-series using 155 µm thickness spacers is superior to ones with 480 µm. This is due to greater energy efficiencies and gross power densities. A 3-stacks system was also studied for the 155 µm thick spacers, but the increase in efficiency did not compensate the loss in power density. Experimental systems using stacks of dimensions 10 cm x 10 cm and 22 cm x 22 cm, both in a 2-stacks in-series setup were tested to attain the best combination of both net power density and energy efficiency. This was achieved at 20 seconds of residence time, in a multistage arrangement, with 0.821 W/m2 and 31.7 % for the smaller stacks, while the bigger ones achieved the best result in a single stage at a residence time of 44 seconds, with 0.748 W/m2 and 31.9 %, respectively. Testing the 10 cm x 10 cm stacks with only 3 shielding cation exchange membranes, showed a blank resistance of 0.279 Ω, which likely means that it can be underestimating the parameters. Further studies should be performed using this correction or, preferably, employing more cell pairs, since the different possibilities multistage systems offer compared to single stacks allow for a bigger flexibility and thus an easier optimization of the key parameters, leading to a better process performance.
id RCAP_ee34fa2a7ca9e979fc7c30379ec03662
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/105718
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy ProductionRenewable EnergySalinity Gradient EnergyMultistage Reverse ElectrodialysisIon Exchange MembranesPower DensityEnergy EfficiencyDomínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia QuímicaThe ever-increasing need for sustainable energy sources creates the necessity to research and develop renewable energies. An example of these is the salinity gradient energy (SGE), where power can be harvested from waters of different salinity. One type of SGE technology is Reverse Electrodialysis (RED), which was tested in this thesis in single and multistage (MSRED) setups in order to improve key parameters like power density and energy efficiency. Simulations using a Phyton model developed at Wetsus showed that a multistage setup with 2 stacks in-series using 155 µm thickness spacers is superior to ones with 480 µm. This is due to greater energy efficiencies and gross power densities. A 3-stacks system was also studied for the 155 µm thick spacers, but the increase in efficiency did not compensate the loss in power density. Experimental systems using stacks of dimensions 10 cm x 10 cm and 22 cm x 22 cm, both in a 2-stacks in-series setup were tested to attain the best combination of both net power density and energy efficiency. This was achieved at 20 seconds of residence time, in a multistage arrangement, with 0.821 W/m2 and 31.7 % for the smaller stacks, while the bigger ones achieved the best result in a single stage at a residence time of 44 seconds, with 0.748 W/m2 and 31.9 %, respectively. Testing the 10 cm x 10 cm stacks with only 3 shielding cation exchange membranes, showed a blank resistance of 0.279 Ω, which likely means that it can be underestimating the parameters. Further studies should be performed using this correction or, preferably, employing more cell pairs, since the different possibilities multistage systems offer compared to single stacks allow for a bigger flexibility and thus an easier optimization of the key parameters, leading to a better process performance.Velizarov, SvetlozarSaakes, MichelRUNRibeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio2022-10-01T00:31:11Z2020-10-0920202020-10-09T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/105718enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:50:57Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/105718Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:40:34.754854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
title Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
spellingShingle Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
Ribeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio
Renewable Energy
Salinity Gradient Energy
Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis
Ion Exchange Membranes
Power Density
Energy Efficiency
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Química
title_short Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
title_full Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
title_fullStr Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
title_full_unstemmed Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
title_sort Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Production
author Ribeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio
author_facet Ribeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Velizarov, Svetlozar
Saakes, Michel
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Pedro Daniel Porfírio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Renewable Energy
Salinity Gradient Energy
Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis
Ion Exchange Membranes
Power Density
Energy Efficiency
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Química
topic Renewable Energy
Salinity Gradient Energy
Multistage Reverse Electrodialysis
Ion Exchange Membranes
Power Density
Energy Efficiency
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Química
description The ever-increasing need for sustainable energy sources creates the necessity to research and develop renewable energies. An example of these is the salinity gradient energy (SGE), where power can be harvested from waters of different salinity. One type of SGE technology is Reverse Electrodialysis (RED), which was tested in this thesis in single and multistage (MSRED) setups in order to improve key parameters like power density and energy efficiency. Simulations using a Phyton model developed at Wetsus showed that a multistage setup with 2 stacks in-series using 155 µm thickness spacers is superior to ones with 480 µm. This is due to greater energy efficiencies and gross power densities. A 3-stacks system was also studied for the 155 µm thick spacers, but the increase in efficiency did not compensate the loss in power density. Experimental systems using stacks of dimensions 10 cm x 10 cm and 22 cm x 22 cm, both in a 2-stacks in-series setup were tested to attain the best combination of both net power density and energy efficiency. This was achieved at 20 seconds of residence time, in a multistage arrangement, with 0.821 W/m2 and 31.7 % for the smaller stacks, while the bigger ones achieved the best result in a single stage at a residence time of 44 seconds, with 0.748 W/m2 and 31.9 %, respectively. Testing the 10 cm x 10 cm stacks with only 3 shielding cation exchange membranes, showed a blank resistance of 0.279 Ω, which likely means that it can be underestimating the parameters. Further studies should be performed using this correction or, preferably, employing more cell pairs, since the different possibilities multistage systems offer compared to single stacks allow for a bigger flexibility and thus an easier optimization of the key parameters, leading to a better process performance.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-09
2020
2020-10-09T00:00:00Z
2022-10-01T00:31:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105718
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105718
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138020454039552